Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Frontiers in Neurology
https://doi.org/10.3389/FNEUR.2023.1150135…
12 pages
1 file
Anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity is a set of unfavorable adverse effects on central or peripheral nervous systems associated with administration of anesthesia. Several animal model studies from the early 2000’s, from rodents to non-human primates, have shown that general anesthetics cause neuroapoptosis and impairment in neurodevelopment. It has been difficult to translate this evidence to clinical practice. However, some studies suggest lasting behavioral effects in humans due to early anesthesia exposure. Dexmedetomidine is a sedative and analgesic with agonist activities on the alpha-2 (ɑ2) adrenoceptors as well as imidazoline type 2 (I2) receptors, allowing it to affect intracellular signaling and modulate cellular processes. In addition to being easily delivered, distributed, and eliminated from the body, dexmedetomidine stands out for its ability to offer neuroprotection against apoptosis, ischemia, and inflammation while preserving neuroplasticity, as demonstrated through man...
Scientific Reports, 2021
Recent animal studies have drawn concerns regarding most commonly used anesthetics and their long-term cytotoxic effects, specifically on the nervous tissue. It is therefore imperative that the search continues for agents that are non-toxic at both the cellular and behavioural level. One such agent appears to be dexmedetomidine (DEX) which has not only been found to be less neurotoxic but has also been shown to protect neurons from cytotoxicity induced by other anesthetic agents. However, DEX’s effects on the growth and synaptic connectivity at the individual neuronal level, and the underlying mechanisms have not yet been fully resolved. Here, we tested DEX for its impact on neuronal growth, synapse formation (in vitro) and learning and memory in a rodent model. Rat cortical neurons were exposed to a range of clinically relevant DEX concentrations (0.05–10 µM) and cellular viability, neurite outgrowth, synaptic assembly and mitochondrial morphology were assessed. We discovered that ...
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017
Background. Brain injury in newborn animals from prolonged anaesthetic exposure has raised concerns for millions of children undergoing anaesthesia every yr. Alternative anaesthetic techniques or mitigating strategies are urgently needed to ameliorate potentially harmful effects. We tested dexmedetomidine, both as a single agent alternative technique and as a mitigating adjuvant for sevoflurane anaesthesia. Methods. Neonatal rats were randomized to three injections of dexmedetomidine (5, 25, 50, or 100 mg kg À1 every 2 h), or 6 h of 2.5% sevoflurane as a single agent without or with dexmedetomidine (1, 5, 10, or 20 mg kg À1 every 2 h). Heart rate, oxygen saturation, level of consciousness, and response to pain were assessed. Cell death was quantified in several brain regions. Results. Dexmedetomidine provided lower levels of sedation and pain control than sevoflurane. Exposure to either sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine alone did not cause mortality, but the combination of 2.5% sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine in doses exceeding 1 mg kg À1 did. Sevoflurane increased apoptosis in all brain regions; supplementation with dexmedetomidine exacerbated neuronal injury, potentially as a result of ventilatory or haemodynamic compromise. Dexmedetomidine by itself increased apoptosis only in CA2/3 and the ventral posterior nucleus, but not in prefrontal cortex, retrosplenial cortex, somatosensory cortex, subiculum, lateral dorsal thalamic nucleaus, or hippocampal CA1. Conclusions. We confirm previous findings of sevoflurane-induced neuronal injury. Dexmedetomidine, even in the highest dose, did not cause similar injury, but provided lesser degrees of anaesthesia and pain control. No mitigation of sevofluraneinduced injury was observed with dexmedetomidine supplementation, suggesting that future studies should focus on anaesthetic-sparing effects of dexmedetomidine, rather than injury-preventing effects.
European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2008
Background: a 2 -Adrenoceptor agonists administered into the intrathecal and epidural space have been found to be effective in the treatment of chronic pain. Moreover, it was shown that they increase the analgesic effects of local anaesthetics and provide sedation, anxiolysis and haemodynamic stability. Dexmedetomidine, a potent and highly selective a 2 -adrenoceptor agonist, is in current clinical use, particularly in the intensive care unit. Our aim was to investigate whether dexmedetomidine produced motor and sensory blockade and neurotoxic effects when administrated via the epidural catheter in rabbits. Methods: Twenty-one New Zealand white rabbits were included in the study. Animals were randomized into three groups. In Group L: lidocaine (2%), in Group LD: lidocaine (2%) 1 dexmedetomidine (5 mg) and in Group D: dexmedetomidine (10 mg) were administered by epidural catheter. Motor and sensory blockade were evaluated. After the evaluation of block, the animals were euthanized and their spinal cords removed for neuropathological evaluations. Results: Motor and sensory blockade were lower in Group D than in Group L and Group LD (P , 0.01). Although there were no differences between the groups for ischaemia of the medulla spinalis, evidence of demyelinization of the oligodendrocytes in the white matter in Group D was significantly higher than in Group L (P 5 0.035). Conclusions: We observed that dexmedetomidine does not have motor and sensory effects, but it may have a harmful effect on the myelin sheath when administered via the epidural route.
Anesthesia: Essays and Researches, 2011
Dexmedetomidine is a new generation highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor (α2-AR) agonist that is associated with sedative and analgesic sparing effects, reduced delirium and agitation, perioperative sympatholysis, cardiovascular stabilizing effects, and preservation of respiratory function. The aim of this review is to present the most recent topics regarding the advantages in using dexmedetomidine in clinical anesthesia and intensive care, while discussing the controversial issues of its harmful effects.
Eur J Pharmacol, 2004
Which of the three α2-adrenoceptor subtypes of α2A, α2B, or α2C mediates the neuroprotective effect of dexmedetomidine was examined in cell culture as well as in an in vivo model of neonatal asphyxia. Dexmedetomidine dose-dependently attenuated neuronal injury (IC50=83±1 nM) in neuronal-glial co-cultures derived from wild-type mice; contrastingly, dexmedetomidine did not exert neuroprotection in injured cells from transgenic mice (D79N) expressing dysfunctional α2A-adrenoceptors. An α2A-adrenoceptor subtype-preferring antagonist 2-[(4,5-Dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)methyl]-2,3-dihydro-1-methyl-1H-isoindole maleate (BRL44408) completely reversed dexmedetomidine-induced neuroprotection, while other subtype-preferring antagonists 2-[2-(4-(2-Methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)ethyl]-4,4-dimethyl-1,3-(2H,4H)-isoquinolindione dihydrochloride (ARC239) (α2B) and rauwolscine (α2C) had no significant effect on the neuroprotective effect of dexmedetomidine in neuronal-glial co-cultures. Dexmedetomidine also protected against exogenous glutamate induced cell death in pure cortical neuron cultures assessed by flow cytometry and reduced both apoptotic and necrotic types of cell death. Likewise this neuroprotective effect was antagonised by BRL44408 but not ARC239 or rauwolscine. Dexmedetomidine exhibited dose-dependent protection against brain matter loss in vivo (IC50=40.3±6.1 μg/kg) and improved the neurologic functional deficit induced by the hypoxic-ischemic insult. Protection by dexmedetomidine against hypoxic-ischemic-induced brain matter loss was reversed by the α2A-adrenoceptor subtype-preferring antagonist BRL44408; neither ARC239 nor rauwolscine reversed the neuroprotective effect of dexmedetomidine in vivo. Our data suggest that the neuroprotective effect of dexmedetomidine is mediated by activation of the α2A adrenergic receptor subtype.
Turkish Neurosurgery, 2012
AIm: The aim was to investigate whether dexmedetomidine had a toxic effect on cerebral neurons when it was administered centrally into the cerebrospinal fluid by the intracisternal route. mAterIAl and methOds: Eighteen rats were anesthetized and the right femoral artery was cannulated. Mean arterial pressures, heart rates, arterial carbon dioxide tension, arterial oxygen tension, and blood pH were recorded. When the free cerebrospinal fluid flow was seen, 0.1 ml normal saline (Group SIC, n=6) or 9 µg/kg diluted dexmedetomidine in 0.1 ml volume (Group DIC, n=6) was administered into the cisterna magna of rats. After 24 hours, the whole body blood was collected for measurement of plasma lipid peroxidation (LPO) levels. The hippocampal formations used for histopathological examination and measurement of tissue LPO levels. results: There was a statistically significant difference between the DIC/SIC groups and DIC/CONTROL groups regarding the brain LPO levels (p=0.002, p<0.001, respectively). Plasma LPO levels were statistically different between the CONTROL/DIC groups, CONTROL/SIC groups, DIC/ SIC groups (p=0.002, p=0.047, p=0.025, respectively), The picnotic neuron counts were different between the CONTROL/SIC groups, CONTROL/ DIC groups, DIC/SIC groups (p<0.001, p=0.001, p=0.024, respectively). COnClusIOn: In conclusion, dexmedetomidine had a toxic effect on cerebral neurons when it was administered centrally into the cerebrospinal fluid by the intracisternal route.
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2015
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective agonist of 2-receptors with sedative, anxiolytic, analgesic, and anesthetic properties. Neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine have been reported in various brain injury models. In the present study, we investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine on neurodegeneration, oxidative stress markers, and inflammation following the induction of hyperoxia in neonatal rats. Six-day-old Wistar rats received different concentrations of dexmedetomidine (1, 5, or 10 g/kg bodyweight) and were exposed to 80% oxygen for 24 h. Sex-matched littermates kept in room air and injected with normal saline or dexmedetomidine served as controls. Dexmedetomidine pretreatment significantly reduced hyperoxia-induced neurodegeneration in different brain regions of the neonatal rat. In addition, dexmedetomidine restored the reduced/oxidized glutathione ratio and attenuated the levels of malondialdehyde, a marker of lipid peroxidation, after exposure to high oxygen concentration. Moreover, administration of dexmedetomidine induced downregulation of IL-1 on mRNA and protein level in the developing rat brain. Dexmedetomidine provides protections against toxic oxygen induced neonatal brain injury which is likely associated with oxidative stress signaling and inflammatory cytokines. Our results suggest that dexmedetomidine may have a therapeutic potential since oxygen administration to neonates is sometimes inevitable.
2018
With the evolution of surgical techniques and technology an increasing number of infants, neonates, and fetuses are exposed to general anesthesia. Despite the acknowledged safety of general anesthesia, a considerable amount of preclinical evidence shows that the developing brain is highly vulnerable to anesthetic drugs. Early-age anesthesia may impair the fine tuning of neurotransmitters and growth factors that orchestrate the replication, differentiation and organization of neural cells into functional networks. In order to translate these insights from animal models to human patients, large trials and observational studies have been published or are currently ongoing. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an update on the pathophysiologic mechanisms and published evidence of anesthesia-related neurotoxicity in pediatric patients.
Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, 2003
Recently it was demonstrated that exposure of the developing brain during the period of synaptogenesis to drugs that block NMDA glutamate receptors or drugs that potentiate GABA A receptors can trigger widespread apoptotic neurodegeneration. All currently used general anesthetic agents have either NMDA receptor-blocking or GABA A receptor-enhancing properties. To induce or maintain a surgical plane of anesthesia, it is common practice in pediatric or obstetrical medicine to use agents from these two classes in combination. Therefore, the question arises whether this practice entails significant risk of inducing apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing human brain. To begin to address this problem, we have administered to 7-d-old infant rats a combination of drugs commonly used in pediatric anesthesia (midazolam, nitrous oxide, and isoflurane) in doses sufficient to maintain a surgical plane of anesthesia for 6 hr, and have observed that this causes widespread apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing brain, deficits in hippocampal synaptic function, and persistent memory/learning impairments.
Current Anesthesiology Reports, 2013
ABSTRACT While earlier clinical investigations focused on characterizing the physiologic effects of dexmedetomidine and its role as a sedative drug in critically-ill patients, newer studies suggest that the alpha 2 adrenergic receptor agonist may have a role as an adjunct in intraoperative neuroanesthesia. Dexmedetomidine has been shown to have multiple favorable clinical effects such as lack of respiratory depression, neuroprotection, hemodynamic stability, and no apparent interference with intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. This suggests that dexmedetomidine can be useful in the management of neurosurgical patients.
Balkan Medical Journal, 2013
Alpha 2 agonists contribute to pain control at the level of the medulla spinalis via descendant neuroadrenergic systems originating from the brain. Neuroadrenergic neurons stemming from the locus coeruleus and subcoeruleus nuclei send projections to the posterior horn of the medulla spinalis. Stimulation of this pathway provides antinociception, apparently dependent on noradrenaline discharge (1). Alpha 2 agonists are frequently added to local anaesthetic agents in order to prolong the duration of spinal or epidural anesthesia. An alpha 2 agonist drug, clonidine, extends the duration of analgesia in patients receiving spinal or epidural anaesthesia when given in combination with local anaesthetics, opioids, or both (2, 3). In studies performed on rats, sedative effects of alpha 2 agonists were suggestively related to the alpha 2A subtype, which involved the region of the locus coeruleus (4, 5). Compared with other alpha 2 agonists, dexmedetomidine has a higher affinity for receptors, and its spinal antinociceptive efficacy has been demonstrated in animal studies (6, 7). It was reported that long-term intrathecal drug application could induce permanent neuronal damage especially following spinal anaesthesia (8, 9). However, the neurotoxic effects of intrathecal or intracerebroventricular dexmedetomidine application are not known. In this study, we applied dexmedetomidine via the intracerebroventricular route for 5 days using a different catheterisation technique, with the intention to investigate its antinociceptive, sedative, and neurotoxic effects on the spinal cord. Material and Methods This study was performed on 32 16-week-old Wistar strain male rats weighing 250-300 g after obtaining the approval of
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, 2016
There is an increasing concern regarding the risk of anesthetic-induced developmental neurotoxicity (AIDN) in children. Evidence has shown that exposure to most of the commonly used anaesthetic and sedatives can cause neurodegeneration in the developing brain. Anesthetic effects on the brain during its growth spurt can initiate a cascade of alterations in neurodevelopment, which can be detected structurally or functionally. Anesthetic exposure induces apoptosis and neurodegeneration in a dose and time-dependent fashion consistent with the pattern of N-methyl D-aspartate antagonism and gamma-amino butyric acid type A activation by these drugs. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of AIDN may help in developing methods that are safe and do not interfere with the beneficial properties of anaesthetic drugs and yet inactivate the intracellular signals that trigger neuroapoptosis.
Translational Perioperative and Pain Medicine, 2018
Since its approval by US Food and Drug Administration in 1999 the clinical use of dexmedetomidine has been gaining in popularity. The indications and clinical applications of this drug have been expanded significantly. In this paper we reviewed its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, mechanisms of action and mainly focused on its clinical uses and outcomes. Common clinical uses of dexmedetomidine include pre-operative anxiolysis, heart rate control during intubation, treatment of bronchospasm, prevention of laryngospasm and avoiding opioid-induced post-operative respiratory depression and nausea and vomiting. Avoiding opioid induced respiratory depression has been especially beneficial in patients with sleep apnea syndrome. Other problems that can be prevented with dexmedetomidine are tachydysrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, delirium and acute kidney injury. Dexmedetomidine is an excellent sedative drug for intubated patients and it greatly facilitates neurological evaluation. It has been used successfully as a patient-controlled anesthesia drug and to prevent shivering. It is also used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics. It has been suggested that dexmedetomidine is a drug that has many beneficial effects and should be used more frequently by anesthesia care providers to prevent common problems in the peri-operative period. With judicious titration to effect during the intravenous administration of this drug the occurrence of side effects can be minimized. It is very likely that this drug will ascend to take a much more prominent role in future anesthesia practice.
Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2007
BACKGROUND: The alpha2-receptor agonist, dexmedetomidine, provides sedation with facilitated arousal and analgesia with no respiratory depression. These properties render it potentially useful for anesthesia premedication, although parenteral administration is not practical in this setting. We designed this study to evaluate the sedative, anxiolytic, analgesic, and hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine administered intranasally in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Koch's design for crossover trials (three-treatment and two-period design) was adopted. The study was double-blind and there were three treatment groups: A (placebo), B (intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 g/kg) and C (intranasal dexmedetomidine 1.5 g/kg). Each of the 18 subjects participated in two study periods. The study drug was administered intranasally after baseline observations of modified Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale, visual analog scale of sedation, bispectral index, visual analog scale of anxiety, pain pressure threshold measured by an electronic algometer, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. These were repeated during the course of the study. RESULTS: Intranasal dexmedetomidine was well tolerated. Both 1 and 1.5 g/kg doses equally produced significant sedation and decreases in bispectral index, SBP, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate when compared with placebo (P Ͻ 0.05). The onset of sedation occurred at 45 min with a peak effect at 90 -150 min. The maximum reduction in SBP was 6%, 23%, and 21% for Groups A, B, and C respectively. There was no effect on pain pressure threshold, oxygen saturation or respiratory rate. Anxiolysis could not be evaluated as no subjects were anxious at baseline. CONCLUSION: The intranasal route is effective, well tolerated, and convenient for the administration of dexmedetomidine. Future studies are required to evaluate the possible role of the noninvasive route of administration of dexmedetomidine in various clinical settings, including its role as premedication prior to induction of anesthesia.
Anesthesiology, 2018
Postoperative delirium is associated with poor long-term outcomes and increased mortality. General anesthetic drugs may contribute to delirium because they increase cell-surface expression and function of α5 subunit-containing γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors, an effect that persists long after the drugs have been eliminated. Dexmedetomidine, an α2 adrenergic receptor agonist, prevents delirium in patients and reduces cognitive deficits in animals. Thus, it was postulated that dexmedetomidine prevents excessive function of α5 γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. Injectable (etomidate) and inhaled (sevoflurane) anesthetic drugs were studied using cultured murine hippocampal neurons, cultured murine and human cortical astrocytes, and ex vivo murine hippocampal slices. γ-Aminobutyric acid type A receptor function and cell-signaling pathways were studied using electrophysiologic and biochemical methods. Memory and problem-solving behaviors were also studied. The etomidate-induced s...
Paediatric anaesthesia, 2015
A multitude of animal studies have shown that virtually all general anesthetics used in clinical practice possibly during a vulnerable period of brain development (i.e., brain growth spurt, peak of synaptogenesis) may lead to neurodegeneration (particularly apoptosis) and abnormal synaptic development with functional deficits in learning and behavior later in life. Initial studies were mainly performed in immature rodent pups, but more recent studies have included nonhumans primates (rhesus monkeys). Given the number of neonates, infants, and young children anesthetized annually worldwide, these findings could have significant public health implications. So far, relatively few human (cohort) studies focusing on this topic have been published with inconsistent results. While some studies have indicated an association between exposure to anesthesia and surgery, other studies have indicated no such association. Prospective studies are underway, but the result will not be available for ...
2014
The practices of anaesthesiology and intensive therapy are difficult to imagine without sedation or general anaesthesia , regardless of whether the patient is a newborn, baby, child or adult. The relevant concerns for children are distinct from those for adults, primarily due to the effects of anatomical, physiological and pharmacokinetic-phar-macodynamic (PK/PD) differences, which become increasingly important in the brains of children as they develop. The process of central nervous system maturation in humans lasts for years, but its greatest activity (myelination and synaptogenesis) occurs during the fetal period and the first two years of life. Many experimental studies have demonstrated that exposure to anaesthetic drugs during this period can induce neurodegenerative changes in the central nervous systems of animals. The extrapolation of these results directly to humans must be performed with great caution, but anaesthesiologists around the world must begin to debate the safet...
Current Anesthesiology Reports, 2013
A multitude of animal studies have shown that virtually all general anesthetics used in clinical practice exert detrimental effects on the developing brain, notably enhanced neuroapoptosis. Some studies have also indicated that animals exposed to general anesthesia may experience long term neurobehavioral deficits later in life. The neurotoxic effects seem to be dose-dependent and have been suspected to occur at certain early developmental stages. Initially, the animal studies comprised primarily rodents but recently they have been confirmed in non-human primates. Recently, a number of (mainly retrospective) human cohort studies have been published with inconsistent results. While some studies have indicated an association between anesthesia and surgery and adverse neurobehavioral outcome, other studies have indicated no association. The cohort studies have many constraints and shortcomings. While prospective studies are underway, they will not provide any answers for several more years. The aim of this review is to provide the reader with a summary of recent human cohort studies and discuss their limitations and weaknesses. Although disturbing, the animal data lacks verification in humans. To date there are no data to support any change in clinical pediatric anesthetic practice. Any such change will be premature and potentially dangerous until we have evidence as to if and how general anesthesia impairs neurocognition and behaviour in infants and young children.
PLOS ONE
Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective agonist of α2-receptors with sedative, anxiolytic, and analgesic properties. Neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine have been reported in various brain injury models. In the present study, we investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine on hippocampal neurogenesis, specifically the proliferation capacity and maturation of neurons and neuronal plasticity following the induction of hyperoxia in neonatal rats. Six-day old sex-matched Wistar rats were exposed to 80% oxygen or room air for 24 h and treated with 1, 5 or 10 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine or normal saline. A single pretreatment with DEX attenuated the hyperoxia-induced injury in terms of neurogenesis and plasticity. In detail, both the proliferation capacity (PCNA+ cells) as well as the expression of neuronal markers (Nestin+, PSA-NCAM+, NeuN+ cells) and transcription factors (SOX2, Tbr1/2, Prox1) were significantly reduced under hyperoxia compared to control. Furthermore, regulators of neuronal plasticity (Nrp1, Nrg1, Syp, and Sema3a/f) were also drastically decreased. A single administration of dexmedetomidine prior to oxygen exposure resulted in a significant up-regulation of expression-profiles compared to hyperoxia. Our results suggest that dexmedetomidine may have neuroprotective effects in an acute hyperoxic model of the neonatal rat.
Journal of Pregnancy and Child Health, 2015
Advances in neonatal and pediatric surgery and intensive care demanded for increasing general anesthesia requirements in small infants, as well as the need for prolonged infusions for sedation. General anesthesia results from a complex pharmacological interaction of different drugs, many with still incompletely known mechanisms . Consequently, their immediate and long-term effects are not completely understood. Traditionally, anesthetic drugs' effects were thought to dissipate as early as the end of their administration, without prospective effects on children development . Since fifties, a concern about anesthetic consequences in the developing brain started to rise due to studies that have showed that vinyl ether, cyclopropane or ethyl chloride administration to young children could cause long-term personality changes . During the past three decades, strong evidence from animal studies have questioned the anesthetic safety profile on central nervous system development, and inflamed debate surrounds the negative effects of anesthesia in the developing brain. In fact, animal studies to date reveal very robust and consistent data concerning anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity in immature mammals and rodents. Considering the universal and serious possible impact of this issue in pediatric health care, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) established a partnership with the International Anesthesia Research Society (IARS), called SmartTots (Strategies for Mitigating Anesthesia-Related Neurotoxicity in Tots), to specifically address and make recommendations on this matter.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.