Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Bioarchaeological field analysis of human remains from the mass graves at Phaleron, Greece

Profile image of Anna LinderholmAnna LinderholmProfile image of Vendela Kempe LagerholmVendela Kempe LagerholmProfile image of Anne IngvarssonAnne IngvarssonProfile image of Ylva A E BäckströmYlva A E BäckströmProfile image of Stella ChryssoulakiStella Chryssoulaki

2019, Opuscula Annual of the Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome 12 2019 STOCKHOLM SVENSKA INSTITUTEN I ATHEN OCH ROM INSTITUTUM ATHENIENSE ATQUE INSTITUTUM ROMANUM REGNI SUECIAE

https://doi.org/10.30549/OPATHROM-12-02
visibility

…

description

154 pages

link

1 file

AI-generated Abstract

This study investigates the bioarchaeological aspects of human remains found in mass graves at the Phaleron cemetery in Greece, which offers insights into societal perceptions of death and burial practices during the Archaic era. By analyzing various types of burials, including deviant and violent ones, the research aims to fill gaps in the understanding of how ancient Attic society dealt with death and its implications.

Figures (389)

Table 1. The percentage of burial types in relation to total number of burials excavated. the Archaic era. The Phaleron cemetery includes all kinds of burials: individual burials, as well as mass burials with traces of violence. The excavation of a considerable number of devi- ant burials at Phaleron will fill a gap in archaeological research into the issue of Archaic society’s behaviour towards burials that diverge from the norm.
Table 1. The percentage of burial types in relation to total number of burials excavated. the Archaic era. The Phaleron cemetery includes all kinds of burials: individual burials, as well as mass burials with traces of violence. The excavation of a considerable number of devi- ant burials at Phaleron will fill a gap in archaeological research into the issue of Archaic society’s behaviour towards burials that diverge from the norm.
Fig. 1. An aerial view of the site with the ongoing excavation. The mass grave of the captives is roofed by the white shelter. Photograph: G. Asvestas/Ephorate of Antiquities of West Attica, Piraeus and Islands.
Fig. 1. An aerial view of the site with the ongoing excavation. The mass grave of the captives is roofed by the white shelter. Photograph: G. Asvestas/Ephorate of Antiquities of West Attica, Piraeus and Islands.
Fig. 2. Different types of burials in the same area: three pot burials, three cist-graves and one pyre (above) and a typical sector of the Phaleron cemetery (below): several pot-burials, two pit-graves and traces of one cist grave next to a pit grave. Photographs: G. Asvestas/Ephorate of Antiquities of West Attica, Piraeus and Islands.
Fig. 2. Different types of burials in the same area: three pot burials, three cist-graves and one pyre (above) and a typical sector of the Phaleron cemetery (below): several pot-burials, two pit-graves and traces of one cist grave next to a pit grave. Photographs: G. Asvestas/Ephorate of Antiquities of West Attica, Piraeus and Islands.
Fig 3. Overview of the area of the mass graves. The drawing includes skeletons that are not considered to be related to the mass burials presented here.
Fig 3. Overview of the area of the mass graves. The drawing includes skeletons that are not considered to be related to the mass burials presented here.
Fig. 10. Part of the 3D digital model, Humanities Laboratory, Lund University. Fig. 8. Sampling at Phaleron, Dr Anna Kjellstrim, Stockholm University.
Fig. 10. Part of the 3D digital model, Humanities Laboratory, Lund University. Fig. 8. Sampling at Phaleron, Dr Anna Kjellstrim, Stockholm University.
Fig. 9. Work for the 3D digital model, by research engineer Stefan Lind- gren and Victor Lundstrém, Humanities Laboratory, Lund University.
Fig. 9. Work for the 3D digital model, by research engineer Stefan Lind- gren and Victor Lundstrém, Humanities Laboratory, Lund University.
Fig. 11. The stratigraphy of the excavation at the Phaleron Delta.
Fig. 11. The stratigraphy of the excavation at the Phaleron Delta.
Table 2. Missing skeletal parts in Row 1.
Table 2. Missing skeletal parts in Row 1.
Fig. 12. No. 1318, southern part of Row 1. The left foot and distal part of the left tibia displaced and positioned lateral to the left tibia diaphysis. Fig. 13. Detail of the left foot of no. 1318, positioned between the left tibia and the right tibia of no. 1392.
Fig. 12. No. 1318, southern part of Row 1. The left foot and distal part of the left tibia displaced and positioned lateral to the left tibia diaphysis. Fig. 13. Detail of the left foot of no. 1318, positioned between the left tibia and the right tibia of no. 1392.
Fig. 14. No. 1393: left foot articulated but displaced, found between the lower legs of the individual.
Fig. 14. No. 1393: left foot articulated but displaced, found between the lower legs of the individual.
Table 3. Individuals with shackles and associated finds. (Y = yes; N = no.)
Table 3. Individuals with shackles and associated finds. (Y = yes; N = no.)
Table 3, continued. Table 4. Associated skeletal elements in Row 1.
Table 3, continued. Table 4. Associated skeletal elements in Row 1.
Fig. 17. Nos. 1392 and 1393, Oinochoe.
Fig. 17. Nos. 1392 and 1393, Oinochoe.
Fig. 20. No. 1344, knife found medial to the left tibia. Fig. 18. No. 1267, finger ring.
Fig. 20. No. 1344, knife found medial to the left tibia. Fig. 18. No. 1267, finger ring.
Fig. 22. No. 1272, arrowhead after conservation. Fig. 21. No. 1272, arrowhead.
Fig. 22. No. 1272, arrowhead after conservation. Fig. 21. No. 1272, arrowhead.
Fig. 19. No. 1228, finger ring.
Fig. 19. No. 1228, finger ring.
Fig. 25. Colour differences on skeletons in Row 3. Fig. 23. No. 1392, right femur, postmortem breakage with brownish- black discolouration. Fig. 24. No. 1296, left tibia with possible animal gnawing, puncturing, and postmortem destruction.
Fig. 25. Colour differences on skeletons in Row 3. Fig. 23. No. 1392, right femur, postmortem breakage with brownish- black discolouration. Fig. 24. No. 1296, left tibia with possible animal gnawing, puncturing, and postmortem destruction.
Table 6. Puncture marks (YA = young adult; MA = Middle adult).
Table 6. Puncture marks (YA = young adult; MA = Middle adult).
Fig. 28. No. 1349, puncture mark, right mandible. Fig. 26. No. 1343, puncture mark, right parietal.
Fig. 28. No. 1349, puncture mark, right mandible. Fig. 26. No. 1343, puncture mark, right parietal.
Fig. 30. No. 1269, puncture mark, left temporal.
Fig. 30. No. 1269, puncture mark, left temporal.
Fig 31. No. 1269, close up of puncture mark, the left temporal. Fig. 29. No. 1349, close up of puncture mark, right mandible.
Fig 31. No. 1269, close up of puncture mark, the left temporal. Fig. 29. No. 1349, close up of puncture mark, right mandible.
Fig. 27. No. 1343, puncture mark, right temporal.
Fig. 27. No. 1343, puncture mark, right temporal.
Table 10. Sex distribution (n = individuals). Table 11. Post-cranial measurements indicative of sex (mm).
Table 10. Sex distribution (n = individuals). Table 11. Post-cranial measurements indicative of sex (mm).
Table 13b continued.
Table 13b continued.
Table 14. Age distribution.
Table 14. Age distribution.
Table 16a. Oral status, mandible (A = absent; U = unobservable; P = present; AMTL = antemortem tooth loss; AM = antemortem; Peri = perimortem; PM = postmortem).
Table 16a. Oral status, mandible (A = absent; U = unobservable; P = present; AMTL = antemortem tooth loss; AM = antemortem; Peri = perimortem; PM = postmortem).
Table 166 continued. Table 17. Summary of dental pathologies, fractures, and discolouration.
Table 166 continued. Table 17. Summary of dental pathologies, fractures, and discolouration.
Table 18. Dental pathologies and discolouration (LEH = linear enamel hypoplasia; PD = periodontal disease ; AMTL = antemortem tooth loss; CE] = cementoenamel junction).
Table 18. Dental pathologies and discolouration (LEH = linear enamel hypoplasia; PD = periodontal disease ; AMTL = antemortem tooth loss; CE] = cementoenamel junction).
Table 19. Measurements of limb bones (mm; blank = unobservable).
Table 19. Measurements of limb bones (mm; blank = unobservable).
Table 20. Mean stature (n = individuals). Table 21. Paleopathology (U = unobservable).
Table 20. Mean stature (n = individuals). Table 21. Paleopathology (U = unobservable).
Table 22. Paleopathology (n = number of individuals; OA = osteoarthritis). Fig. 32. No. 1355, expanded diploé, right parietal.
Table 22. Paleopathology (n = number of individuals; OA = osteoarthritis). Fig. 32. No. 1355, expanded diploé, right parietal.
Fig. 33. No. 1340, porosities, left parietal, left occipital.
Fig. 33. No. 1340, porosities, left parietal, left occipital.
NONMETRIC TRAITS Table 23. Nonmetric traits (n = number of traits recorded). individual could be determined only as “adult”, whereas three individuals were estimated as middle adults (MA). One indi- vidual (no. 1266), a young adult male in Row 1, shows OA on the medial epiphysis of the left clavicle.
NONMETRIC TRAITS Table 23. Nonmetric traits (n = number of traits recorded). individual could be determined only as “adult”, whereas three individuals were estimated as middle adults (MA). One indi- vidual (no. 1266), a young adult male in Row 1, shows OA on the medial epiphysis of the left clavicle.
Fig. 36. No. 1269, Allen’ fossa. Fig. 34. No. 1389, wormian bones.
Fig. 36. No. 1269, Allen’ fossa. Fig. 34. No. 1389, wormian bones.
Fig. 35. No. 1344, enlarged parietal foramina.
Fig. 35. No. 1344, enlarged parietal foramina.
Fig. 37. No. 1297, antemortem trauma to the left parietal.
Fig. 37. No. 1297, antemortem trauma to the left parietal.
Table 24. Description of fractures. Likely perimortem fracture (LPF) and possible perimortem fracture (PPF) (BFT = blunt force trauma; HBL = the so-called rule of the “hat brim line’, see below, p. 73).
Table 24. Description of fractures. Likely perimortem fracture (LPF) and possible perimortem fracture (PPF) (BFT = blunt force trauma; HBL = the so-called rule of the “hat brim line’, see below, p. 73).
Fig. 38. No. 1296, LPE left mandible. Fig. 39. No. 1336, LPE right temporal and right mandible.
Fig. 38. No. 1296, LPE left mandible. Fig. 39. No. 1336, LPE right temporal and right mandible.
Fig. 41. No. 1356, LPE, right temporal, right sphenoid, right mandible. Fig. 40. No. 1353, LPE right parietal, right zygomatic, right frontal.
Fig. 41. No. 1356, LPE, right temporal, right sphenoid, right mandible. Fig. 40. No. 1353, LPE right parietal, right zygomatic, right frontal.
Fig. 42. No. 1359, LPE right temporal, left mandible.
Fig. 42. No. 1359, LPE right temporal, left mandible.
Fig. 45. No. 1383, LPE, right temporal, righ sphenoid, left frontal, right maxilla, and left mandible. Fig. 44. No. 1374, LPE, right mandible.
Fig. 45. No. 1383, LPE, right temporal, righ sphenoid, left frontal, right maxilla, and left mandible. Fig. 44. No. 1374, LPE, right mandible.
Fig. 46. No. 1390, LPE, right mandible. Fig. 43. No. 1373, LPE, right temporal, right sphenoid.
Fig. 46. No. 1390, LPE, right mandible. Fig. 43. No. 1373, LPE, right temporal, right sphenoid.
Fig 50. No. 1316, LPE left parietal, left temporal, left sphenoid. Fig. 47. No. 1269, LPE left mandible. Fig. 48. No. 1386, LPF, right mandible. tively fresh or moist. However, Alan Richard Moritz noted that if the head was immobilized, ie., resting on the ground a blow would result in a comminuted fracture with inward displace- ment on the cranium.” This type of fractures was noted in nine individuals (nos. 1359, 1336, 1373, 1353, 1383, 1356, 1272, 1316, and 1339—Row 3), which makes blows to the head on individuals lying down possible. Another likely scenario is that some of the individuals were executed at site when kneeling
Fig 50. No. 1316, LPE left parietal, left temporal, left sphenoid. Fig. 47. No. 1269, LPE left mandible. Fig. 48. No. 1386, LPF, right mandible. tively fresh or moist. However, Alan Richard Moritz noted that if the head was immobilized, ie., resting on the ground a blow would result in a comminuted fracture with inward displace- ment on the cranium.” This type of fractures was noted in nine individuals (nos. 1359, 1336, 1373, 1353, 1383, 1356, 1272, 1316, and 1339—Row 3), which makes blows to the head on individuals lying down possible. Another likely scenario is that some of the individuals were executed at site when kneeling
Fig. 49. No. 1272, LPE right parietal.
Fig. 49. No. 1272, LPE right parietal.
Fig. 51. No. 1333, LPE left frontal.
Fig. 51. No. 1333, LPE left frontal.
Fig. 54. No. 1348, PPE, left mandible. Fig. 53. No. 1328, PPE, right parietal, right temporal, right sphenoid, right mandible.
Fig. 54. No. 1348, PPE, left mandible. Fig. 53. No. 1328, PPE, right parietal, right temporal, right sphenoid, right mandible.
Fig. 52. No. 1324, PPE, left mandible, left temporal.
Fig. 52. No. 1324, PPE, left mandible, left temporal.
Fig. 56. No. 1349, PPE, right temporal.
Fig. 56. No. 1349, PPE, right temporal.
Fig. 61. No. 1363, PPE, right temporal. Fig. 59. No. 1353, PPE, left femur.
Fig. 61. No. 1363, PPE, right temporal. Fig. 59. No. 1353, PPE, left femur.
Fig. 57. No. 1349, PPE, left mandible.
Fig. 57. No. 1349, PPE, left mandible.
Fig. 60. No. 1361, PPE, right temporal. Fig. 58. No. 1353, PPE, right mandible.
Fig. 60. No. 1361, PPE, right temporal. Fig. 58. No. 1353, PPE, right mandible.
Fig. 62. No. 1365, PPE, right mandible.
Fig. 62. No. 1365, PPE, right mandible.
Fig. 65. No. 1374, PPE, right temporal, left mandible. Fig. 63. No. 1364, PPE, right temporal, right mandible.
Fig. 65. No. 1374, PPE, right temporal, left mandible. Fig. 63. No. 1364, PPE, right temporal, right mandible.
Fig. 67. No. 1380, PPF, right temporal.
Fig. 67. No. 1380, PPF, right temporal.
Fig. 64. No. 1366, PPE, right sphenoid.
Fig. 64. No. 1366, PPE, right sphenoid.
Fig. 66. No. 1375, PPE, left mandible.
Fig. 66. No. 1375, PPE, left mandible.
Fig. 68. No. 1381, PPE, right temporal.
Fig. 68. No. 1381, PPE, right temporal.
Fig. 73. No. 1389, PPE, right temporal, right mandible. Fig. 71. No. 1267, PPE, left temporal.
Fig. 73. No. 1389, PPE, right temporal, right mandible. Fig. 71. No. 1267, PPE, left temporal.
Fig. 69. No. 1383, PPF, right femur. Fig. 70. No. 1390, PPE, right second metacarpal and right third metacarpal.
Fig. 69. No. 1383, PPF, right femur. Fig. 70. No. 1390, PPE, right second metacarpal and right third metacarpal.
Fig. 72. No. 1267, PPE, right mandible.
Fig. 72. No. 1267, PPE, right mandible.
Fig. 74. No. 1369, PPE, left mandible.
Fig. 74. No. 1369, PPE, left mandible.
Fig. 75. No. 1357, PPE, left mandible.
Fig. 75. No. 1357, PPE, left mandible.
Fig. 77. No. 1388, PPE, right temporal, right mandible.
Fig. 77. No. 1388, PPE, right temporal, right mandible.
Fig. 76. No. 1387, PPE, right mandible.
Fig. 76. No. 1387, PPE, right mandible.
Fig. 79. No. 1271, PPE, right temporal, right zygomatic, right parietal, right frontal.
Fig. 79. No. 1271, PPE, right temporal, right zygomatic, right parietal, right frontal.
Fig. 80. No. 1333, PPE, right mandible.
Fig. 80. No. 1333, PPE, right mandible.
Fig. 81. Skeletons, Row 1.
Fig. 81. Skeletons, Row 1.
For information regarding the data re- corded in this appendix, see above, un- der the heading “Methods”. DESCRIPTION
For information regarding the data re- corded in this appendix, see above, un- der the heading “Methods”. DESCRIPTION
The skeleton is placed in a supine po- sition in an E-W direction (cranium to the E). Visceral cranium smashed, mandible missing. Most parts of the
The skeleton is placed in a supine po- sition in an E-W direction (cranium to the E). Visceral cranium smashed, mandible missing. Most parts of the
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Fig. 82. Skeleton no. 1201. Fig. 83. Skeleton no. 1202.
Fig. 82. Skeleton no. 1201. Fig. 83. Skeleton no. 1202.
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure
Fig. 85. Skeleton no. 1245. Fig. 84. Skeleton no. 1215. Epiphyses
Fig. 85. Skeleton no. 1245. Fig. 84. Skeleton no. 1215. Epiphyses
SKELETON NO. 1245—ROW | (FIG. 85)
SKELETON NO. 1245—ROW | (FIG. 85)
Estimate of age at death: Adult? Pathology/Trauma Antemortem trauma: U Likely perimortem trauma: U Possible perimortem trauma: U
Estimate of age at death: Adult? Pathology/Trauma Antemortem trauma: U Likely perimortem trauma: U Possible perimortem trauma: U
Fig. 86. Individual no. 1247. Suture closure (ectocranial)
Fig. 86. Individual no. 1247. Suture closure (ectocranial)
Pathology/Trauma Antemortem trauma: U Likely perimortem trauma: U Possible perimortem trauma: U
Pathology/Trauma Antemortem trauma: U Likely perimortem trauma: U Possible perimortem trauma: U
Fig. 87. Skeleton no. 1253. Fig. 88. Skeleton no. 1266.
Fig. 87. Skeleton no. 1253. Fig. 88. Skeleton no. 1266.
Fig. 90. Skeleton no. 1289. Fig. 89. Skeleton no. 1281.
Fig. 90. Skeleton no. 1289. Fig. 89. Skeleton no. 1281.
SKELETON NO. 1289—ROW | (FIG. 90)
SKELETON NO. 1289—ROW | (FIG. 90)
Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
‘The skeleton is placed in a supine posi- tion in an E-W direction (cranium to the E), with wrists in shackles, above the head. The skull is inclined on the right side. Left leg is crossed over the right leg. Left foot is displaced between the two tibiae. The skeleton is almost complete; more than 2/3 of the skeletal parts are present. Around 1/3-2/3 of the bones have a pronounced degree of erosion on the surfaces and are fragmented. Quantitative preservation: 3 Qualitative preservation: 2
‘The skeleton is placed in a supine posi- tion in an E-W direction (cranium to the E), with wrists in shackles, above the head. The skull is inclined on the right side. Left leg is crossed over the right leg. Left foot is displaced between the two tibiae. The skeleton is almost complete; more than 2/3 of the skeletal parts are present. Around 1/3-2/3 of the bones have a pronounced degree of erosion on the surfaces and are fragmented. Quantitative preservation: 3 Qualitative preservation: 2
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption Ts fF | Suture closure (ectocranial)
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption Ts fF | Suture closure (ectocranial)
Fig. 92. Skeleton no. 1297. Fig. 91. Skeleton no. 1296.
Fig. 92. Skeleton no. 1297. Fig. 91. Skeleton no. 1296.
Estimate of age at death: Juvenile Criteria: Epiphyses, and pubic symphysis
Estimate of age at death: Juvenile Criteria: Epiphyses, and pubic symphysis
Fig. 93. Skeleton no. 1318.. Fig. 94. Skeleton no. 1324.
Fig. 93. Skeleton no. 1318.. Fig. 94. Skeleton no. 1324.
Epiphyses interment of skeleton no. 1556. Only legs, feet, the pelvic girdle, the lower part of the lumbar spine, lower arms, and hands are present. Cranium and trunk are missing. The left foot is displaced be- side the left fibula. Some dispersed bones are found near to this skeleton; an ulna and some phalanges of the hand. Less than 1/3 of the skeleton is preserved, and the quality of the bones is poor, but the bones present are well preserved. Quantitative preservation: 1 Qualitative preservation: 3 Position Skeleton: Supine Cranium: Missing Limbs: Left upper limb—flexed, Left hand—U, Left lower limb—flexed, Right upper limb—probably flexed, Skeleton no. 1336 is placed over the trunk of this skeleton (probably the rea- son for the disturbances?) re OU
Epiphyses interment of skeleton no. 1556. Only legs, feet, the pelvic girdle, the lower part of the lumbar spine, lower arms, and hands are present. Cranium and trunk are missing. The left foot is displaced be- side the left fibula. Some dispersed bones are found near to this skeleton; an ulna and some phalanges of the hand. Less than 1/3 of the skeleton is preserved, and the quality of the bones is poor, but the bones present are well preserved. Quantitative preservation: 1 Qualitative preservation: 3 Position Skeleton: Supine Cranium: Missing Limbs: Left upper limb—flexed, Left hand—U, Left lower limb—flexed, Right upper limb—probably flexed, Skeleton no. 1336 is placed over the trunk of this skeleton (probably the rea- son for the disturbances?) re OU
LSM ALE Of aXe Al AeALN: AAULL Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses Suture closure (ectocranial)
LSM ALE Of aXe Al AeALN: AAULL Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses Suture closure (ectocranial)
Fig. 95. Skeleton no. 1325. Fig. 96. Skeleton no. 1328.
Fig. 95. Skeleton no. 1325. Fig. 96. Skeleton no. 1328.
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses Suture closure (ectocranial)
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses Suture closure (ectocranial)
Fig. 97. Skeleton no. 1336. Fig. 98. Skeleton no. 1339.
Fig. 97. Skeleton no. 1336. Fig. 98. Skeleton no. 1339.
Pelvis Skull
Pelvis Skull
Skull Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, anc tooth wear awe a
Skull Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, anc tooth wear awe a
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Pathology/Trauma Antemortem trauma: U Likely perimortem trauma: U Possible perimortem trauma: U
Pathology/Trauma Antemortem trauma: U Likely perimortem trauma: U Possible perimortem trauma: U
Fig. 100. Skeleton no. 1342. Fig. 99. Skeleton no. 1340.
Fig. 100. Skeleton no. 1342. Fig. 99. Skeleton no. 1340.
Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Criteria: Skull, pelvis, and measurement
Criteria: Skull, pelvis, and measurement
Fig. 101. Skeleton no. 1343. Fig. 102. Skeleton no. 1348. Skull
Fig. 101. Skeleton no. 1343. Fig. 102. Skeleton no. 1348. Skull
Pelvis
Pelvis
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Fig. 103. Skeleton no. 1349. Fig. 104. Skeleton no. 1350.
Fig. 103. Skeleton no. 1349. Fig. 104. Skeleton no. 1350.
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Pe eee eee
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Pe eee eee
Fig. 106. Skeleton no. 1354. Fig. 105. Skeleton no. 1353.
Fig. 106. Skeleton no. 1354. Fig. 105. Skeleton no. 1353.
Estimate of age at death: Middle adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear y Pee Peres
Estimate of age at death: Middle adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear y Pee Peres
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption Shackles: No according to diary/hands folded on the back according to field ob- servation Suture closure (ectocranial)
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption Shackles: No according to diary/hands folded on the back according to field ob- servation Suture closure (ectocranial)
Pelvis Skull
Pelvis Skull
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, anc tooth eruption yr. 7
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, anc tooth eruption yr. 7
Fig. 107. Skeleton no. 1355. Fig. 108. Skeleton no. 1356.
Fig. 107. Skeleton no. 1355. Fig. 108. Skeleton no. 1356.
Suture closure (ectocranial) Estimate of age at death: Middle adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, pu- bic symphysis, tooth eruption, and tooth wear
Suture closure (ectocranial) Estimate of age at death: Middle adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, pu- bic symphysis, tooth eruption, and tooth wear
Epiphyses Pelvis
Epiphyses Pelvis
Fig. 110. Skeleton no. 1359. Fig. 109. Skeleton no. 1358.
Fig. 110. Skeleton no. 1359. Fig. 109. Skeleton no. 1358.
Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption
Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption
Relation to other skeletons Left pectoral girdle below the left elbow of skeleton no. 1381; the right femur be- low the right femur of skeleton no. 1358; left lower leg below the right leg of skel- eton no. 1381
Relation to other skeletons Left pectoral girdle below the left elbow of skeleton no. 1381; the right femur be- low the right femur of skeleton no. 1358; left lower leg below the right leg of skel- eton no. 1381
46 cm (femur dx, maximum head)
46 cm (femur dx, maximum head)
Lstimate of age at deat: MIAaLe AAULL Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, pubic symphysis, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Enpiphvyses
Lstimate of age at deat: MIAaLe AAULL Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, pubic symphysis, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Enpiphvyses
Fig. 111. Skeleton no. 1360.
Fig. 111. Skeleton no. 1360.
Fig. 112. Skeleton no. 1361.
Fig. 112. Skeleton no. 1361.
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear meewd
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear meewd
Skull
Skull
Fig. 113. Skeleton no. 1363.
Fig. 113. Skeleton no. 1363.
Fig 114. Skeleton no. 1364.
Fig 114. Skeleton no. 1364.
Estimate of age at death: Juvenile Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, pu- bic symphysis, and tooth eruption
Estimate of age at death: Juvenile Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, pu- bic symphysis, and tooth eruption
Fig. 115. Skeleton no. 1365. Fig. 116. Skeleton no. 1366. Epiphyses
Fig. 115. Skeleton no. 1365. Fig. 116. Skeleton no. 1366. Epiphyses
The skeleton is placed in a supine posi- tion in an E-W direction (cranium to the E). Right humerus is stretched above the head, but no shackle was found. The right arm (humerus, ulna, and ra- dius), and hand is missing, as well as the right fibula. Some bones from the hand (MCII-V, and some carpals), anda right pelvis (male) that does not belong to this individual, were found beside the right shoulder. The skeleton is almost com- plete; more than 2/3 of the skeletal parts are present, and they are well preserved. Quantitative preservation: 3 Qualitative preservation: 3 Position CLeletan: Guanine
The skeleton is placed in a supine posi- tion in an E-W direction (cranium to the E). Right humerus is stretched above the head, but no shackle was found. The right arm (humerus, ulna, and ra- dius), and hand is missing, as well as the right fibula. Some bones from the hand (MCII-V, and some carpals), anda right pelvis (male) that does not belong to this individual, were found beside the right shoulder. The skeleton is almost com- plete; more than 2/3 of the skeletal parts are present, and they are well preserved. Quantitative preservation: 3 Qualitative preservation: 3 Position CLeletan: Guanine
Fig. 117. Skeleton no. 1373. Fig. 118. Skeleton no. 1374. Suture closure (ectocranial)
Fig. 117. Skeleton no. 1373. Fig. 118. Skeleton no. 1374. Suture closure (ectocranial)
Position
Position
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Fig. 119. Skeleton no. 1375. Fig. 120. Skeleton 1376.
Fig. 119. Skeleton no. 1375. Fig. 120. Skeleton 1376.
SKELETON NO. 1376—ROW | (FIG. 120)
SKELETON NO. 1376—ROW | (FIG. 120)
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses Suture closure (ectocranial) Stature: 161.37 cm (femur dx) Pathology/Trauma Antemortem trauma: U Likely perimortem trauma: U Possible perimortem trauma: X
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses Suture closure (ectocranial) Stature: 161.37 cm (femur dx) Pathology/Trauma Antemortem trauma: U Likely perimortem trauma: U Possible perimortem trauma: X
Fig. 121. Skeleton no. 1379. Fig. 122. Skeleton no. 1380.
Fig. 121. Skeleton no. 1379. Fig. 122. Skeleton no. 1380.
Epiphyses Skull Estimate of age at death: Juvenile Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption
Epiphyses Skull Estimate of age at death: Juvenile Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption
Skull Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, pu- bic symphysis, tooth eruption, and tooth wear
Skull Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, pu- bic symphysis, tooth eruption, and tooth wear
Fig. 123. Skeleton no. 1381. Fig. 124. Skeleton no. 1382.
Fig. 123. Skeleton no. 1381. Fig. 124. Skeleton no. 1382.
Pelvis
Pelvis
Lstimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, pubic symphysis, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Epiphyses
Lstimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, pubic symphysis, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Epiphyses
The skeleton is placed in a supine posi- tion in an E-W direction (cranium to
The skeleton is placed in a supine posi- tion in an E-W direction (cranium to
Fig. 125. Skeleton no. 1383. Fig. 126. Skeleton no. 1390.
Fig. 125. Skeleton no. 1383. Fig. 126. Skeleton no. 1390.
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Fig. 127. Skeleton no. 1392. Only lumbar vertebrae, legs, and feet are present; placed in a supine position in an E-W direction (cranium should be to the E). The left foot is displaced between the lower legs. Less than 1/3 of the skel- eton is preserved, and the quality of the bones is good and the bones present are well preserved.
Fig. 127. Skeleton no. 1392. Only lumbar vertebrae, legs, and feet are present; placed in a supine position in an E-W direction (cranium should be to the E). The left foot is displaced between the lower legs. Less than 1/3 of the skel- eton is preserved, and the quality of the bones is good and the bones present are well preserved.
Fig. 129. Skeleton no. 1228.
Fig. 129. Skeleton no. 1228.
Fig. 130. Skeleton no. 1267.
Fig. 130. Skeleton no. 1267.
Estimate of age at death: Middle adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear aay erenreen
Estimate of age at death: Middle adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear aay erenreen
Skull Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses and suture closure Epiphyses
Skull Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses and suture closure Epiphyses
Fig. 131. Skeleton no. 1268.
Fig. 131. Skeleton no. 1268.
Fig. 132. Skeleton no. 1269.
Fig. 132. Skeleton no. 1269.
Criteria: Skull, pelvis, and measurement Skull
Criteria: Skull, pelvis, and measurement Skull
Pelvis
Pelvis
Suture closure (ectocranial) Suture closure (ectocranial)
Suture closure (ectocranial) Suture closure (ectocranial)
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses Finds
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses Finds
Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Fig. 133. Skeleton no. 1298.
Fig. 133. Skeleton no. 1298.
Fig. 134. Skeleton no. 1351.
Fig. 134. Skeleton no. 1351.
Fig. 135. Skeleton no. 1357. Fig. 136. Skeleton no. 1368.
Fig. 135. Skeleton no. 1357. Fig. 136. Skeleton no. 1368.
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear meee)
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear meee)
Estimate of age at death: Middle adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Ye a See
Estimate of age at death: Middle adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Ye a See
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Stature: 162.85 cm (humerus dx) Pathology/Trauma
Stature: 162.85 cm (humerus dx) Pathology/Trauma
Fig. 137. Skeleton no. 1369. Fig. 138. Skeleton no. 1370.
Fig. 137. Skeleton no. 1369. Fig. 138. Skeleton no. 1370.
Criteria: Skull, pelvis, and measurement Skull
Criteria: Skull, pelvis, and measurement Skull
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Se A Suture closure (ectocranial)
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Se A Suture closure (ectocranial)
Fig. 139. Skeleton no. 1371. Fig. 140. Skeleton no. 1386.
Fig. 139. Skeleton no. 1371. Fig. 140. Skeleton no. 1386.
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption we ae o
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption we ae o
Fig. 141. Skeleton no. 1387.
Fig. 141. Skeleton no. 1387.
Fig. 142. Skeleton no. 1388.
Fig. 142. Skeleton no. 1388.
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and tooth eruption Epiphyses
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and tooth eruption Epiphyses
Pelvis
Pelvis
Criteria: Skull, pelvis, and measurement Skull
Criteria: Skull, pelvis, and measurement Skull
Stature: 158.99 cm (femur dx)
Stature: 158.99 cm (femur dx)
Fig. 143. Skeleton no. 1389.
Fig. 143. Skeleton no. 1389.
Fig. 144. Skeleton no. 1397.
Fig. 144. Skeleton no. 1397.
Estimate of sex: Undeterminea Criteria: Skull, and pelvis Skull
Estimate of sex: Undeterminea Criteria: Skull, and pelvis Skull
Suture closure (ectocranial) Fig. 145. Skeletons, Row 3.
Suture closure (ectocranial) Fig. 145. Skeletons, Row 3.
Fig. 146. Skeleton 1271.
Fig. 146. Skeleton 1271.
Fig. 147. Skeleton no. 1272.
Fig. 147. Skeleton no. 1272.
Estimate of sex: Undetermined Criteria: Skull cCL.,//] Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and tooth eruptior
Estimate of sex: Undetermined Criteria: Skull cCL.,//] Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and tooth eruptior
Estimate of age at death: Juvenile Criteria: Suture closure, tooth eruptior and tooth wear Capmperlnaiwe (ortnrraini al)
Estimate of age at death: Juvenile Criteria: Suture closure, tooth eruptior and tooth wear Capmperlnaiwe (ortnrraini al)
Fig. 148. Skeleton no. 1275.
Fig. 148. Skeleton no. 1275.
Fig. 149. Skeleton no. 1276.
Fig. 149. Skeleton no. 1276.
Pelvis Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and pubic symphysis Epiphyses
Pelvis Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and pubic symphysis Epiphyses
Fig. 150. Skeleton no. 1277. Fig. 151. Skeleton no. 1288.
Fig. 150. Skeleton no. 1277. Fig. 151. Skeleton no. 1288.
Stature: 163.75 cm (femur sin) Pathology/Trauma Antemortem trauma: U Likely perimortem trauma: U Possible perimortem trauma: U
Stature: 163.75 cm (femur sin) Pathology/Trauma Antemortem trauma: U Likely perimortem trauma: U Possible perimortem trauma: U
Criteria: Epiphyses, and tooth eruption Epiphyses
Criteria: Epiphyses, and tooth eruption Epiphyses
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption
Fig. 152. Skeleton no. 1294. Fig. 153. Skeleton no. 1316.
Fig. 152. Skeleton no. 1294. Fig. 153. Skeleton no. 1316.
Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth wear en |
Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth wear en |
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, pubic symphysis, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Enpniphvses
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, pubic symphysis, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Enpniphvses
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption — ee |
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption — ee |
Fig. 154. Skeleton no. 1332. Fig. 155. Skeleton no. 1333.
Fig. 154. Skeleton no. 1332. Fig. 155. Skeleton no. 1333.
Pelvis Skull
Pelvis Skull
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Estimate of age at death: Adult Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Fig. 156. Skeleton no. 1344.
Fig. 156. Skeleton no. 1344.
Fig. 157. Skeleton no. 1384.
Fig. 157. Skeleton no. 1384.
Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Shackles: Yes—wrists. Possibly left arm tied with left arm of skeleton no. 1384, same clamp?
Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, tooth eruption, and tooth wear Shackles: Yes—wrists. Possibly left arm tied with left arm of skeleton no. 1384, same clamp?
Fig. 158. Skeleton no. 1385.
Fig. 158. Skeleton no. 1385.
Fig 159. Skeleton no. 1398.
Fig 159. Skeleton no. 1398.
Pelvis
Pelvis
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption So ee 2
Estimate of age at death: Young adult Criteria: Epiphyses, suture closure, and tooth eruption So ee 2
Fig. 160. Skeleton no. 1399. Fig. 161. Skeleton no. 1400.
Fig. 160. Skeleton no. 1399. Fig. 161. Skeleton no. 1400.
Criteria: Skull, pelvis, and measurement Skull
Criteria: Skull, pelvis, and measurement Skull
Pelvis
Pelvis
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Suture closure (ectocranial)
Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Criteria: Epiphyses, and suture closure Epiphyses
Table 26 continued.
Table 26 continued.

Related papers

ELITE BURIALS IN EARLY IRON AGE AEGEAN. SOME PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS CONSIDERING THE SPATIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE TOUMBA CEMETERY AT LEFKANDI
Irene Lemos
View PDFchevron_right
The archeological excavations, in Enzo Lippolis, Rita Sassu, Chiara Giatti & Luigi Maria Caliò, Gortys. Archaeological excavations of new mausoleums in Αρχαιολογικο Εργο Κρητησ 3, the Praetorium area, Rethymno 2015, pp. 537-552 (ISBN 978-618-82325-2-5)
Rita Sassu

The area investigated during the 2011-2014 archaeological excavations carried out by the ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome is located north of the northern plateia, that crosses the city of Gortys from west to east, connecting the city center to the agora, and along which main public edifices are placed, and east of the Nymphaeum complex previously dug in 2003-2013. Here a group of considerable and relevant monuments, to be dated back to the Roman imperial age, was unearthed under the Byzantine layers. Such monuments seem to be characterized by private nature and at least one of them should be certainly regarded as a funerary edifice, a sort of monumental mausoleum.

View PDFchevron_right
Burials in prehistoric mounds: reconnecting with the past in early medieval Greece
Florin Curta
View PDFchevron_right
Cemeteries in the countryside: An archaeological investigation of the modern landscape in the eastern Korinthia and northern Kythera
Lita Tzortzopoulou-Gregory

Archaeology and History in medieval and post-medieval Greece: Studies on method and meaning in honor of Timothy E. Gregory, 2008

the archaeology of historic period cemeteries, including those of the last few centuries, has been an area of research undertaken by many scholars during the latter part of the 20th century, particularly in Britain and north America. in greece, modern period cemetery studies have been few in number, and limited to anthropological investigations or folkloric descriptions. The present paper provides an attempt at an archaeological study of cemeteries, and of their development over the last couple of centuries, in two distinct regions of greece: the eastern corinthia and northern Kythera. The monuments constructed in these cemeteries provide a unique look into how Greeks of the 19th and 20th centuries viewed issues of commemoration, group identity, and national identification. The ways in which the monuments have been preserved over time also provides important information about the ways in which individuals are remembered, and the length of time that this memory endures.

View PDFchevron_right
2006-2007 Excavations of the Mycenaean cemetery at Ayia Sotira Ancient Nemea
Evangelia Pappi, Mary K Dabney, Sevi Triantaphyllou
View PDFchevron_right
Bioarchaeological field analysis of human remains from the mass graves at Phaleron, Greece. With an introduction by Stella Chryssoulaki and an appendix by Anna Linderholm, Anna Kjellström, Vendela Kempe Lagerholm, Maja Krzewińska
Ylva A E Bäckström

Opuscula. Annual of the Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome

In 2016, archaeological excavations undertaken by the Ephorate of Antiquities of West Attica, Piraeus and Islands 3.8 km south-west of Athens, Greece, revealed mass burials of 79 skeletons in three rows. The burials are dated to the 7th century BC. The anthropological field documentation was undertaken by The Swedish Institute of Athens, and followed established bioarchaeological protocols regarding taphonomic processes, age, sex, injuries, and pathological changes. The descriptions and interpretations should be regarded as preliminary field observations. A majority of the individuals were young adult or juvenile males, most of them without signs of active disease and with a generally good oral health status, but with corroded iron shackles around their wrists. Cause of death could not be determined although extensive and likely perimortem fractures were observed. The only object related to injury and/or possible cause of death was an arrowhead found in the chest of one of the skele...

View PDFchevron_right
Gortys. Archaeological excavations of new mausoleums in the Praetorium area
Enzo Lippolis

Gortys. Archaeological excavations of new mausoleums in the Praetorium area (con Rita Sassu, Chiara Giatti & Luigi Maria Caliò), Αρχαιολογικο Εργο Κρητης 3, Rethymno 2015, pp. 537-552 ISBN 978-618-82325-2-5 , 2015

μιχΑλησ γ. ΑνδριΑνΑκησ Το έργο της Επιστημονικής Επιτροπής Ανάδειξης Οχυρωματικών Έργων Κρήτης The work of the Scientific Committee for the Enhancement of Cretan Fortifications 2. ΠΕριΦΕρΕιΑκη ΕνοτητΑ ηρΑκλΕιου-regionAL unit of herAkLion Προϊστορική περίοδος-Prehistoric Era χριστινΑ ΠΑΠΑδΑκη & ιωΑννΑ σΕρΠΕτσιδΑκη Νέες θέσεις των μινωικών χρόνων στην περιοχή του Κρουσώνα Two new Minoan sites in Krousonas region 6 Περιεχομενα-ContEnts ιωΑννΑ σΕρΠΕτσιδΑκη Ανασκαφική έρευνα στον Κατσαμπά Ηρακλείου Excavations at Katsambas, Heraklion κΑλλιοΠη γκΑλΑνΑκη, χριστινΑ ΠΑΠΑδΑκη & don eveLy Σωστική ανασκαφική έρευνα στον Σαμπά Πεδιάδας Rescue excavation in Sambas, Pediada: Preliminary remarks γιωργοσ ΒΑΒουρΑνΑκησ

View PDFchevron_right
Burial Customs in Hellenistic Iasos. Archaeological Evidence from the Area of the “Prehistoric Necropolis”
Daniela Baldoni

Elif Özer (ed.), Anadolu’da Hellenistik ve Roma Dönemlerinde Ölü Gömme Adetleri Uluslararasi Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabi/The Book of International Symposium on Burial Customs in Anatolia During the Hellenistic and Roman Periods (Aizanoi 23 -26 July 2018), Ankara, pp. 3-31, 2019

The purpose of this paper is to examine a group of graves, dating to the Hellenistic period, particularly interesting for their location and the presence of burials marked by funerary monuments on the surface. Their typology and the wealth of the grave goods, that include gold ornaments and terracotta figurines, has no comparisons among the coeval Iasian tombs. The analysis of these findings, well characterized from a formal and ritual point of view, aims to include them in the local thematic framework and specify their relationships and chronology. İasos’un ölü kentlerinin nerede bulunduğu, içinde hangi eserlerin inşa edildiği, hangi gömme adetinin ve törenlerinin belgelendirildiğine dair bilgilerimiz geniş olmakla birlikte tam sayılamaz. Örneğin ’60 yılların sonlarında eski tarihi kentten uzak olmayan bir alanda ortaya çıkarılan “Prehistorik ölü kenti” konusu bu bağlamda oldukça anlamlıdır. M.Ö. 3 bin yılında başlayan kasvetli kullanımı, Roma ve Hellenistik dönemlerinde de saptanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, konumu ve mezarlar anıtlı gömmenin olması bakımından oldukça ilgi çeken Hellenistik döneme ait bir grup mezar analize etmektir. Nitekim bu mezarların tipolojisi ve altın süslemeleri, terakotadan yapılmış küçük heykeller gibi ortaya çıkarılan eşyaların zenginliği, aynı döneme ait diğer yerel mezarlarda rastlanmamaktadır. Görünüş ve tören bakımından net özellikler taşıyan bu bulguların analizi, yerel tematik çerçeve içeresinde açıklamayı ve planimetrik/fotoğraf belgelendirmesi yetersiz olmasına rağmen olabildiğince en doğru şekilde aralarındaki ilişkileri ile kronolojisini belirtmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

View PDFchevron_right
The Submycenaean and Protogeometric Cemetery on 2, Odos Irodou Attikou, Athens, Greece
Maria Kondopanayou

C. Graml, A. Doronzio, V. Capozzoli (eds). Rethinking Athens before the Persian Wars, 2020

View PDFchevron_right
The Early Bronze Age Cemetery at Chalandriani on Syros (Cyclades, Greece)
Jan Jaap Hekman
View PDFchevron_right

References (101)

  1. Malmström et al. 2009; Svensson et al. 2007; Yang et al. 1998. 105 Meyer & Kircher 2010.
  2. Günther et al. 2018; 2015.
  3. Meyer & Kircher 2010.
  4. Li & Durbin 2010. 109 Kircher 2012.
  5. Briggs et al. 2007; Hansen et al. 2001; Hofreiter et al. 2001; Orlando et al. 2011; Sawyer et al. 2012. 111 Skoglund et al. 2014. Bibliography
  6. Angel, J.L. 1975. 'Paleoecology, paleodemography and health' , in Population, ecology and social evolution, ed. S. Polgar, The Hague, 167-190. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110815603.167
  7. Arbour, L. 2008. `Blunt force trauma´, in Skeletal trauma. Identification of injuries resulting from human rights abuse and armed conflict, ed. E.H. Kimmerle & J.P. Baraybar, Boca Raton, Florida, 151-195.
  8. Aufderheide, A.C. & C. Rodrígues-Martin 1998. The Cambridge encyclopedia of human paleopathology, Cambridge.
  9. Boehlau, J. 1887. 'Frühattische Vasen' , Jdl 2, 33-66.
  10. Borrini, M., P.P. Mariani, C. Murgia, C. Rodriguez & T.V. Tumbarello 2012. 'Contextual taphonomy. Superficial bone alterations as contextual indicators' , Journal of Biological Research 85:1, 217-219. https://doi.org/10.4081/jbr.2012.4115
  11. Briggs, A.W., U. Stenzel, P.L.F. Johnson, R.E. Green, J. Kelso, K. Prüfer, M. Meyer, J. Krause, M.T. Ronan, M. Lachmann & S. Pääbo 2007. 'Patterns of dam- age in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal' , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 14616-14621. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704665104
  12. Brothwell, D.R. 1972 2 . Digging up bones. The excavation, treat- ment and study of human skeletal remains, London.
  13. Buikstra, J.E. & D.H. Ubelaker, eds. 1994. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Proceedings of a seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History organized by Jonathan Haas (Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series, 44), Fayetteville, Arkansas.
  14. Burk, M.P. 2012. Forensic pathology of fractures and mecha- nisms of injury. Postmortem CT scanning, London. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11494
  15. Byers, S.N. 2008 3 . Introduction to forensic anthropology, Boston. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642031
  16. Calce, T. & T.L. Rogers 2007. 'Taphonomic changes of blunt force trauma. A preliminary study' , Journal of Forensic Science 52:3, 519-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00405.x Chryssoulaki, S. forthcoming. 'The excavations of Phaleron cemetery 2012-2017. An introduction' , in Rethink- ing Athens. Interdisciplinary approaches to the polis before the Persian Wars. Internationalen Workshop für junge Wissenschaftler vom 23.-24. Februar 2017 an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, eds.
  17. C. Graml, A. Doronzio & V. Capozzoli, Munich.
  18. Cole, G. & T. Waldron 2016. 'Purple staining of archaeo- logical human bone. An investigation of probable cause and implications for other tissues and artifacts' , Journal of Anthropology 2016, article ID 9479051. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9479051
  19. DiMaio V.J. & D. DiMaio 2001 2 . Forensic pathology, Boca Raton, Florida.
  20. Dimitriadou, E.M. 2012. Πρώιμη Αθήνα (1100-480 π.Χ.). Παρατηρήσεις στην οικιστική εξέλιξη και στα νεκροταφεία, Ph.D. thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
  21. Dirkmaat, D.C., L.L. Cabo, S.D. Ousley & S.A. Symes 2008. 'New perspectives in forensic anthropology' , Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 51, 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20948
  22. Duday, H. 2009. The archaeology of the dead. Lectures in archaeothanatology (Studies in Funerary Archaeol- ogy, 3), Oxford.
  23. Dufton, A. & C. Fenwick 2012. 'Beyond the grave. Develop- ing new tools for medieval cemetery analysis at Vil- lamagna, Italy' , in Thinking beyond the tool. Archaeo- logical computing and the interpretive process (BAR-IS, 2344), eds. A. Chrysanthi, P. Murrieta Flores & C. Papadopoulos, Oxford, 155-167.
  24. Dupras, T.L. & J.J. Schultz 2013. 'Taphonomic bone staining and color changes in forensic contexts' , in Manual of forensic taphonomy, eds. J.T. Pokines & S.A. Symes, Boca Raton, Florida, 315-340. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15424-13
  25. Finegan, O. 2008. 'Case study. The interpretation of skeletal trauma resulting from injuries sustained prior to, and as a direct result of freefall' , in Skeletal trauma. Iden- tification of injuries resulting from human rights abuse and armed conflict, eds. E.H. Kimmerle & J.P. Baraybar, Boca Raton, Florida, 181-195.
  26. Galloway, A. & V.L. Wedel 2014 2 . 'Bones of the skull, the dentition and osseus structures of the throat' , in Broken bones. Anthropological analysis of blunt force trauma, eds. V.L. Wedel & A. Galloway, Springfield, Illinois, 133-160.
  27. Galloway, A., L. Zephro & V.L. Wedel 2014 2 . 'Diagnostic criteria for the determination and classification of timing and fracture mechanism' , in Broken bones. An- thropological analysis of blunt force trauma, eds. V.L. Wedel & A. Galloway, Springfield, Illinois, 47-58.
  28. Goodman, A.H. & J.C. Rose 1990. 'Assessment of systemic physiological perturbations from dental enamel hypo- plasias and associated histological structures' , Ameri- can Journal of Physical Anthropology 33, 59-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330330506
  29. Goodman, A., G. Armelagos & J. Rose 1980. 'Enamel hypo- plasias as indicators of stress in three prehistoric popu- lations from Illinois' , Human Biology 52:3, 515-528.
  30. Günther, T., H. Malmström, E.M. Svensson, A. Omrak, F. Sánchez-Quinto, G.M. Kılınç, M. Krzewińska, G. Eriksson, M. Fraser, H. Edlund, A.R. Munters, A. Coutinho, L.G. Simões, M. Vicente, A. Sjölander, B. Jansen Sellevold, R. Jørgensen, P. Claes, M.D. Shriver, C. Valdiosera, M.G. Netea, J. Apel, K. Lidén, B. Skar, J. Storå, A. Götherström & M. Jakobsson 2018. 'Population genomics of Mesolith- ic Scandinavia. Investigating early postglacial migration routes and high-latitude adaptation' , PLOS Biology 16, article ID e2003703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003703
  31. Günther, T., C. Valdiosera, H. Malmström, I. Ureña, R. Rodriguez-Varela, Ó.O. Sverrisdóttir, E.A. Daska- laki, P. Skoglund, T. Naidoo, E.M. Svensson, J.M. Bermúdez de Castro, E. Carbonell, M. Dunn, J. Storå, E. Iriarte, J.L. Arsuaga, J.-M. Carretero, A. Götherström & M. Jakobsson 2015. 'Ancient genomes link early farmers from Atapuerca in Spain to modern-day Basques' , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 11917-11922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509851112
  32. Guyomarc'h, P., M. Campagna-Vaillancourt, C. Kremer & A. Sauvageau 2010. 'Discrimination of falls and blows in blunt head trauma. A multi-criteria ap- proach' , Journal of Forensic Sciences 55:2, 423-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01310.x
  33. Hansen, A., E. Willerslev, C. Wiuf, T. Mourier, P. Arctander 2001. 'Statistical evidence for miscoding lesions in ancient DNA templates' , Molecular Biology and Evo- lution 18:2, 262-265. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003800
  34. Hillson, S. 1996. Dental anthropology, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139170697
  35. Hofreiter, M., V. Jaenicke, D. Serre, A. von Haeseler, S. Pääbo 2001. 'DNA sequences from multiple amplifications reveal artifacts induced by cytosine deamination in ancient DNA' , Nucleic Acids Research 29, 4793-4799. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.23.4793
  36. Keramopoulos, A. 1923. Αποτυμπανισμός. Συμβολή αρχαιολογική εις την ιστορίαν του Ποινικού Δικαίου και την Λαογραφία, Athens.
  37. Kimmerle, E.H. & J.P. Baraybar, eds. 2008. Skeletal trauma. Identification of injuries resulting from human rights abuse and armed conflict, Boca Raton, Florida. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420009118
  38. Kircher, M. 2012. ' Analysis of high-throughput ancient DNA sequencing data' , in Methods in molecular biology, eds. B. Shapiro & M. Hofreiter, New York, 197-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-516-9_23
  39. Knüsel, C.J. 2014. 'Crouching in fear. Terms of engagement for funerary remains' , Journal of Social Archaeology 14, 26-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605313518869
  40. Knüsel, C.J. & J. Robb 2016. 'Funerary taphonomy. An over- view of goals and methods' , JAS Reports 10, 655-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.031
  41. Kourouniotis, K. 1911. 'Εξ Αττικής. Α΄ Ανασκαφαί Παλαιού Φαλήρου' , AEphem 50, 246-251.
  42. Kranioti, E.F. 2015. 'Forensic investigation of cranial injuries due to blunt force trauma. Current best practice' , Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science 2015:5, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.2147/rrfms.s70423
  43. Kremer, C., S. Racette, C.-A. Dionne & A. Sauvageau 2008. 'Discrimination of falls and blows in blunt force head trauma. Systematic study of the hat brim line rule in relation to skull fractures' , Journal of Forensic Sciences 53:3, 716-719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00725.x
  44. Krogman, W.M. 1978. The human skeleton in forensic medi- cine, Springfield, Illinois.
  45. Krovitz, G.E. & P. Shipman 2007. 'Taphonomy of immature hominid skulls and the Taung, Mojokerto, and Herto specimens' , in Breathing life into fossils. Taphonomic studies in honor of C.K. (Bob) Brain (Stone Age Insti- tute Publication Series, 2), eds. T.R. Pickering, K. Schick & N. Toth, Gosport, Indiana, 207-232.
  46. Larsen, C.P. 1997 1 . Bioarchaeology. Interpreting behavior from the human skeleton (Cambridge Studies in Biological Anthropology, 21), Cambridge.
  47. Larsen, C.P. 2015 2 . Bioarchaeology. Interpreting behavior from the human skeleton (Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology, 69), Cambridge.
  48. Li, H. & R. Durbin 2010. 'Fast and accurate long-read align- ment with Burrows-Wheeler transform' , Bioinfor- matics 26, 589-595. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698
  49. Lieverse, A.R. 1999. 'Diet and the aetiology of dental calculus' , International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 9:4, 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099- 1212(199907/08)9:4<219::aid-oa475>3.0.co;2-v
  50. Lillie, M.C. 1996. 'Mesolithic and Neolithic populations of Ukraine. Indications of diet from dental pathology' , CurrAnthr 37:1, 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1086/204479
  51. Liston, M.A. & L.P. Day 2009. 'It does take a brain surgeon. A successful trepanation from Kavousi, Crete' , in New directions in the skeletal biology of Greece (Occasional Wiener Laboratory Series, 1), eds. L.A. Schepartz, S.C. Fox & C. Bourbou, Princeton, New Jersey, 57-73.
  52. Lovell, N.C. 1997. 'Trauma analysis in paleopathology' , Year- book of Physical Anthropology 40, 139-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096- 8644(1997)25+<139::aid-ajpa6>3.0.co;2-#
  53. Lukacs, J.R. 2007. 'Dental trauma and antemortem tooth loss in prehistoric Canary Islanders. Prevalence and contributing factors' , International Journal of Osteoar- chaeology 17:2, 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.864
  54. Lyman, L. 2010. 'What taphonomy is, what it isn't, and why taphonomists should care about the difference' , Jour- nal of Taphonomy 8:1, 1-16.
  55. Malmström, H., M.T. Gilbert, M.G. Thomas, M. Brand- ström, J. Storå, P. Molnar, P.K. Andersen, C. Ben- dixen, G. Holmlund, A. Götherström & E. Willerslev 2009. 'Ancient DNA reveals lack of continuity be- tween Neolithic hunter-gatherers and contemporary Scandinavians' , Current Biology 19, 1758-1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.017
  56. Mann, R.W. & D.R. Hunt 2005 2 . Photographic regional atlas of bone disease. A guide to pathologic and normal variation in the human skeleton, Springfield, Illinois.
  57. Maples, W.R. 1986. 'Trauma analysis by the forensic anthro- pologist' , in Forensic osteology. Advances in the identifi- cation of human remains, ed. K.J. Reichs, Springfield, Illinois, 218-228.
  58. Meyer, M. & M. Kircher 2010. 'Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing' , Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2010, article ID pdb.prot5448. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5448
  59. Moritz, A.R. 1954 2 . The pathology of trauma, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  60. Morris, I. 1989. 'Attitudes toward death in Archaic Greece' , ClAnt 8:2, 296-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/25010911
  61. Morris, I. 1992. Death-ritual and social structure in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611728
  62. Nawrocki, S.P., J.E. Pless, D.A. Hawley & S.A. Wagner 1997. 'Fluvial transport of human crania' , in Forensic tapho- nomy. The postmortem fate of human remains, eds.
  63. W.D. Haglund & M.H. Sorg, Boca Raton, Florida, 529-548. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439821923.sec5
  64. Orlando, L., A. Ginolhac, M. Raghavan, J. Vilstrup, M. Ras- mussen, K. Magnussen, K.E. Steinmann, P. Kapranov, J.F. Thompson, G. Zazula, D. Froese, I. Moltke, B. Shapiro, M. Hofreiter, K.A. Al-Rasheid, M.T. Gilbert & E. Willerslev 2011. 'True single-molecule DNA sequencing of a Pleistocene horse bone' , Ge- nome Research 21, 1705-1719. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.122747.111
  65. Ortner, D.J. 2003 2 . Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-528628-2.X5037-6
  66. Ortner, D.J. & G.J. Putschar 1985 1 . Identification of pathologi- cal conditions in human skeletal remains (Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, 28), Washington.
  67. Parker, R. 1983. Miasma. Pollution and purification in early Greek religion, Oxford.
  68. Pelekidis, S. 1916. 'Ανασκαφή Παλαιού Φαλήρου' , ADelt B2, 13-64.
  69. Philippson, A. & E. Kirsten 1952. Die griechischen Land- schaften 1:3. Attika und Megaris, Frankfurt.
  70. Pink, C.M. 2016. 'Forensic ancestry assessment using cranial nonmetric traits traditionally applied to biologi- cal distance studies' , in Biological distance analysis. Forensic and bioarchaeological perspectives, eds. M.A. Pilloud & J.T. Hefner, London, 213-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-801966-5.00011-1
  71. Rodríguez-Martin, C. 2006. 'Identification and differential diagnosis of traumatic lesions of the skeleton' , in Forensic anthropology and medicine. Complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death, eds. A. Schmitt, E. Cunha & J. Pinheiro, Totowa, New Jersey, 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-099-7_8
  72. Rogers, J. & T. Waldron 1995. A field guide to joint disease in archaeology, Chichester & New York.
  73. Rogers, J., L. Shepstone & P. Dieppe 1997. 'Bone formers. Osteophyte and enthesophyte formation are posi- tively associated' , Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 56:2, 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.56.2.85
  74. Sauer, N.J. 1998. 'The timing of injuries and manner of death. Distinguishing between antemortem, perimor- tem and postmortem trauma' , in Forensic osteology. Advances in the identification of human remains, ed. K.J. Reichs, Springfield, Illinois, 321-332.
  75. Sawyer, S., J. Krause, K. Guschanski, V. Savolainen & S. Pääbo 2012. 'Temporal patterns of nucleotide mis- incorporations and DNA fragmentation in ancient DNA' , PLoS ONE 7, article ID e34131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034131
  76. Scheuer, L. & S.M. Black 2000. Developmental juvenile osteol- ogy, San Diego, California. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-624000-9.x5000-x
  77. Schmitt, H., E. Dubljanin, S. Schneider & M. Schiltenwolf 2004. 'Radiographic changes in the lumbar spine in former élite athletes' , Spine 29:22, 2554-2559.
  78. Skoglund, P., B.H. Northoff, M.V. Shunkov, A.P. Dere- vianko, S. Pääbo, J. Krause & M. Jakobsson 2014. 'Separating endogenous ancient DNA from modern- day contamination in a Siberian Neandertal' , Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 2229-2234. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1318934111
  79. Skoglund, P., J. Storå, A. Götherström & M. Jakobsson 2013. ' Accurate sex identification of ancient human remains using DNA shotgun sequencing' , JAS 40, 4477-4482. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.07.004
  80. Smith, C. 1884. 'Pyxis. Herakles and Geryon' , JHS 5, 176-184. https://doi.org/10.2307/623702
  81. Spitz, W.U. & D.J. Spitz, eds. 1993 3 . Spitz and Fisher's medico- legal investigation of death. Guidelines for the application of pathology to crime investigation, Springfield, Illinois.
  82. Spradley, M.K. & R.L. Jantz 2011. 'Sex estimations in foren- sic anthropology. Skull versus postcranial elements' , Journal of Forensic Sciences 56:2, 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.x
  83. Stewart, T.D. 1979. Essentials of forensic anthropology espe- cially as developed in the United States, Springfield, Illinois.
  84. Stuart-Macadam, P. 1992. 'Anemia in past human popula- tions' , in Diet, demography and disease. Changing perspectives on anemia, eds. P. Stuart-Macadam & S. Kent, New York, 151-170.
  85. Svensson, E.M., C. Anderung, J. Baubliene, P. Persson, H. Malmström, C. Smith, M. Vretemark, L. Daugno- ra & A. Götherström 2007. 'Tracing genetic change over time using nuclear SNPs in ancient and modern cattle' , Animal Genetics 38:4, 378-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01620.x
  86. Symes, S.A., E.N. L' Abbé, K.E. Stull, M. Lacroix & J.T. Pokines 2014. 'Taphonomy and the timing of bone fractures in trauma analysis' , in Manual of foren- sic taphonomy, eds. J.T. Pokines & S.A. Symes, Boca Raton, Florida, 341-366. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15424-14
  87. Ta' Ala, S.C., G.E. Berg. & K. Haden 2006. 'Blunt force trauma in the Cambodian Killing Fields' , Journal of Forensic Sciences 51:5, 996-1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00219.x Thapliyal, G.K., R. Sinha, P.S. Menon & A. Chakranarayan 2008. 'Management of mandibular fractures' , Medical Journal Armed Forces India 64:3, 218-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-1237(08)80096-2
  88. Trotter, M. 1970. 'Estimation in stature from intact long limb bones' , in Personal identification in mass disasters. Report of a seminar held in Washington, D.C., 9-11 December 1968, by arrangement between the Sup- port Services of the Department of the Army and the Smithsonian Institution, ed. T.D. Stewart, Washing- ton, 71-84.
  89. Ubelaker, D.H. 1989 2 . Human skeletal remains. Excavation, analysis, interpretation (Manuals on Archaeology, 2), Washington, D.C.
  90. Ubelaker, D.H. & K.M. Montaperto 2014. 'Trauma inter- pretation in the context of biological anthropology' , in The Routledge handbook of the bioarchaeology of human conflict, eds. C. Knüsel & M.J. Smith, Oxford & New York, 25-38. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315883366.ch2
  91. Unnewher, M., C. Homann, P.F. Schmidt, P. Sotony, G. Fischer, B. Brinkmann, T. Bajanowski & A. DuChesne 2003. 'Fracture properties of the human mandible' , International Journal of Legal Medicine 117:6, 326-330.
  92. Valavanis, P. 2010. 'Αθήνα' , in Αρχαία Αθήνα και Αττική. Ιστορική Τοπογραφία του Άστεως και της Χώρας, ed. A.I. Vlachopoulos, Athens, 40-61.
  93. Vianello, D., F. Sevini, G. Castellani, L. Lomartire, M. Capri & C. Franceschi 2013. 'HAPLOFIND. A new method for high-throughput mtDNA haplogroup assignment' , Human Mutation 34, 1189-1194. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22356
  94. Walker, P.L. 1995. 'Problems of preservation and sexism in sexing. Some lessons from historical collections for palaeodemographers' , in Grave reflections. Portraying the past through cemetery studies, eds. S.R. Saunders & A. Herring, Toronto, 31-47.
  95. Walker, P.L., R.R. Bathurst, R. Richman, T. Gjerdrum & V.A. Andrushko 2009. 'The causes of porotic hyperostosis and cribra orbitalia. A reappraisal of the iron-deficiency-anemia hypothesis' , American Journal of Physical Anthropology 139:2, 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21031
  96. Weiss, E. 2006. 'Osteoarthritis and body mass' , JAS 33:5, 690-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.003
  97. Weiss, E. & R. Jurmain 2007. 'Osteoarthritis revisited. A contemporary review of aetiology' , International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 17:5, 437-450. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.889
  98. Weston, D.A. 2012. 'Nonspecific infections in palaeopathol- ogy. Interpreting periosteal reactions' , in A companion to paleopathology (Blackwell Companions to Anthro- pology, 14), ed. A.L. Grauer, Chichester, West Sussex & Malden, Massachussetts, 492-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444345940.ch27
  99. White, T.D. 1991. Human osteology, San Diego.
  100. White, T.D., M.T. Black & P.A. Folkens 2012 3 . Human osteology, Amsterdam & London. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-03221-8
  101. Yang, D.Y., B. Eng, J.S. Waye, J.C. Dudar & S.R. Saunders 1998. 'Technical note. Improved DNA extraction from ancient bones using silica-based spin columns' , American Journal of Physical Anthropology 105:4, 539-543. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096- 8644(199804)105:4<539::aid-ajpa10>3.3.co;2-2

Related papers

Lagia, A., I. Moutafi, R. Orgeolet, D. Skorda and J. Zurbach. 2016. Revisiting the Tomb: Mortuary Practices in Habitation Areas in the Transition to the Late Bronze Age at Kirrha, Phocis”. In Staging Death: Funerary Performance, Architecture and Landscape in the Aegean. pp. 181-206.
Raphael Orgeolet, Julien Zurbach, Anna Lagia, Ioanna Moutafi
View PDFchevron_right
Moutafi, I. 2013. "Ch.22: The Cremation Burial and Other Human Remains". In Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas G., and Boyd, M.J. The settlement at Dhaskalio (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008. Volume I), pp. 451-462
Ioanna Moutafi

The settlement at Dhaskalio (The sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: the excavations of 2006–2008. Volume I), 2013

View PDFchevron_right
Review of "The Bronze Age Cemeteries at Karmi Palealona and Lapatsa in Cyprus: Excavations by J. R. B. Stewart," SIMA 136 by Jennifer M. Webb, David Frankel, et al. in Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 2011, 363: 99-101.
Louise Steel
View PDFchevron_right
THE PRE- AND PROTO-PALATIAL CEMETERY AT PETRAS-KEPHALA: A PERSISTENT LOCALE AS AN ARENA FOR COMPETING CULTURAL MEMORIES
David W. Rupp

MNHMH / MNEME PAST AND MEMORY IN THE AEGEAN BRONZE AGE  Proceedings of the 17th International Aegean Conference, University of Udine, Department of Humanities and Cultural Heritage, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Department of Humanities, 17-21 April 2018, 2019

View PDFchevron_right
S. Fritzilas, Grave Stelai and Burials in Megalopolis, in Η. Cavanagh, W. Cavanagh, J. Roy (ed.), Hοnouring the Dead in the Peloponnese. Proceedings of the conference held at Sparta 23-25 April 2009, CSPS Online Publication 2, The University of Nottingham. 99-128, Fig. 1-2
STAMATIS FRITZILAS
View PDFchevron_right
Given, M., Mavromatis, C., and Gabrieli, R.S., eds. 2024. City and Cemetery: Excavations at Kourion's Amathous Gate Cemetery, Cyprus: The Excavations of Danielle A. Parks. Volume 1: Context, Analysis, and Conclusions. Annual of ASOR 76. Boston.
Xenia-Paula Kyriakou, Chris Mavromatis, Michael Given

City and Cemetery: Excavations at Kourion's Amathous Gate Cemetery, Cyprus: The Excavations of Danielle A. Parks. Volume 1: Context, Analysis, and Conclusions, 2024

View PDFchevron_right
The 3rd Young Researchers’ Conference in Aegean Archaeology (2015) - Book of Abstracts
Katarzyna Żebrowska
View PDFchevron_right
The ancient cemeteries of Astypalaia, Greece
Anna Clement

Archaeology International, 2008

View PDFchevron_right
Contribution of physical Anthropology in the Study of Graves from Apamea-on-the-Euphrates (Turkey)
Arnaud Lefebvre

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2010

View PDFchevron_right
Review of Rethinking Athens before the Persian Wars (C. Graml, A. Doronzio, V. Capozzoli)
Nathan Arrington
View PDFchevron_right
The Late Classical Cemetery of the Ayios Dionysios Rail Station in Piraeus
Evangelos Kroustalis, Aris Tsaravopoulos

in V. Sîrbu - R. Stefănescu (eds.), Funerary Practices in Central and Eastern Europe (10th c. BC – 3rd c. AD), 131-152, 2008

View PDFchevron_right
Alexandridou, A. & Kaklamani, O., Θάνατος II Review of Publications on Mortuary Practices in Greece (10th – 4th c. BC), Antiquité Classique 87, 2018, 225-266
Alexandra Alexandridou
View PDFchevron_right
Respected and Reused Graves in Greek and Roman Corinth, in Pelargòs 3, 2022, 197-211
Alexia Giglio

Pelargòs 3, 2022

View PDFchevron_right
The South Necropolis of Samothrace: Topos Hieros or an Ordinary Cemetery?
Petya Ilieva

Ancient West and East, 2020

View PDFchevron_right
The Eastern necropolis of Nea Paphos: Overcoming challenges in a lost landscape
George Papasavvas

Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2018

View PDFchevron_right
Remembering and Forgetting: The Relationship Between Memory and the Abandonment of Graves in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Greek Cemeteries. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, Volume 14, Number 2 , pp. 285-301.
Lita Tzortzopoulou-Gregory

2010

View PDFchevron_right
Marking of Tombs and Customs Related to the Phenomenon of Transition (passage) in the Ancient Cemetery of “Phoenikia”, Lagonisi, eastern Attica, Greece
Aris Tsaravopoulos
View PDFchevron_right
Asterios Aidonis, Hellenistic Cremation Burial Practices. An Anthropological Study of Thesprotian Graves, in Bjorn Forsen and Esko Tikkala (ed.), Thesprotia Expedition II. Environment and Settlement Patterns, Papers and Monographs of the Finnish Institute at Athens XVI, Helsinki 2011
Asterios Aidonis

Thesprotia Expedition II. Environment and Settlement Patterns, 2011

View PDFchevron_right
Secondary cremation burials at Kavousi Vronda, Crete: Symbolic representation in mortuary practice
Maria Liston

Hesperia, 2007

View PDFchevron_right
LM III MORTUARY PRACTICES IN WEST CRETE: THE CEMETERIES OF MAROULAS AND ARMENOI NEAR RETHYMNON
ELENI PAPADOPOULOU

2017

View PDFchevron_right
Papadatos & Sofianou 2013 Mesorrachi Tholos Tomb (AEA 10)
Yiannis Papadatos
View PDFchevron_right
A tomb with a view: the rock cut cemetery at Alahan in Isauria, Turkey
Emma L Baysal

Adalya

View PDFchevron_right
Honouring the Dead off-Stage: A Case of Tomb Cult South of Grave Circle B, Mycenae, by Eleni Konstantinidi-Syvridi and Constantinos Paschalidis, with a Contribution by Argyro Nafplioti
Kostas Paschalidis

Honouring the Dead in the Peloponnese Proceedings of the conference held in Sparta 23-35 April 2009. Edited by Helen Cavanagh, William Cavanagh and James Roy. CSPS Online Publication 2 prepared by Sam Farnham., 2011

View PDFchevron_right
2001 Cremation Burial in LMIIIC - Sub Minoan Crete and the Cemetery at Pézoulos Atsipádhes
Jennifer Moody
View PDFchevron_right
Roads out of Attica, in M.M. Miles (ed.), Autopsy in Athens. Recent Archaeological Work on Athens and Attica. Oxbow Books, Oxford, 2015.
Daniele Pirisino, Sylvian Fachard

M.M. Miles (ed.), Autopsy in Athens. Recent Archaeological Work on Athens and Attica. Oxbow Books, Oxford, 2015. , 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

Human OsteologyMass Graves
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104