Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Dynamic Analysis of Fiscal Policy in the United Kingdom

2018, Journal of economics and public finance

https://doi.org/10.22158/JEPF.V5N1P1
descriptionSee full PDF

Abstract

This paper studies the effects of fiscal stimuli on the real GDP of the United Kingdom for the period of 1997 through the first quarter of 2017. Structural vector autoregressive and vector error correction models are estimated. Impulse responses from both models provide support for the Keynesian view that fiscal stimuli are associated with rises in the real GDP. Variance decomposition analysis shows that over time, depending which model is considered; tax cuts impart a positive effect on the real GDP in the range of 5 to 20 percent. Government expenditure shocks account for 8 to 15 percent of variations in the real GDP based on the two models. The multipliers of tax cuts and government expenditures initially rise reaching a peak in the ninth quarter and decline to 1.60 and 1.74 in three years, respectively.

References (30)

  1. Aiyagari, S. R., Christiano, L. J., & Eichenbaum, M. (1992). The output, employment, and interest rate effects of government consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics, 30(1), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(92)90045-4
  2. Aschauer, D. A. (1985). Fiscal policy and aggregate demand. The American Economic Review, 75(1), 117-127.
  3. Bailey, M. J. (1971). National Income and the Price Level: A Study in Macroeconomic Theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York.
  4. Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of political economy, 82(6), 1095-1117. https://doi.org/10.1086/260266
  5. Barro, R. J. (1978). Comment from an unreconstructed Ricardian. Journal of Monetary Economics, 4(3), 569-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(78)90051-X
  6. Barro, R. J. (1981). Output effects of government purchases. Journal of political Economy, 89(6), 1086-1121. https://doi.org/10.1086/261024
  7. Baxter, M., & King, R. G. (1993). Fiscal policy in general equilibrium. The American Economic Review, 315-334.
  8. Bernanke, B. S. (1986), Alternative Explanations of the Money-Income Correlation. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 25, 49-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(86)90037-0
  9. Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. The Quarterly Journal of economics, 117(4), 1329-1368. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935043
  10. Burnside, C., Eichenbaum, M., & Fisher, J. D. (2004). Fiscal shocks and their consequences. Journal of Economic theory, 115(1), 89-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0531(03)00252-7
  11. Christiano, L. J., & Eichenbaum, M. (1992). Current real-business-cycle theories and aggregate labor-market fluctuations. The American Economic Review, 430-450.
  12. Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., & Evans, C. L. (1997). Sticky price and limited participation models of money: A comparison. European Economic Review, 41(6), 1201-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00071-8
  13. Devereux, M. B., Head, A. C., & Lapham, B. J. (1996). Monopolistic competition, increasing returns, and the effects of government spending. Journal of Money, credit and Banking, 28(2), 233-254. https://doi.org/10.2307/2078025
  14. Fatá s, A., & Mihov, I. (2001a). The effects of fiscal policy on consumption and employment: Theory and evidence.
  15. Fatá s, A., & Mihov, I. (2001b). Government size and automatic stabilizers: International and www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/jepf Journal of Economics and Public Finance Vol. 5, No. 1, 2019
  16. Published by SCHOLINK INC. intranational evidence. Journal of International Economics, 55(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00093-9
  17. Favero, C. (2002). How do European monetary and fiscal authorities behave? Favero, C. A. (2001). Applied macroeconometrics. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  18. Feldstein, M. (1982). Government deficits and aggregate demand. Journal of monetary economics, 9(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(82)90047-2
  19. Galí , J., López-Salido, J. D., & Vallé s, J. (2005). Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption (No. w11578). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  20. Giordano, R., Momigliano, S., Neri, S., & Perotti, R. (2007). The effects of fiscal policy in Italy: Evidence from a VAR model. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(3), 707-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.10.005
  21. Hall, Robert. (1980). Labor Supply and Aggregate Fluctuations. Carnegie-Rochester Confer-ence Series on Public Policy, 12, 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(80)90019-6
  22. Hemming, R., Mahfouz, S., & Kell, M. (2002). The effectiveness of fiscal policy in stimulating economic activity-A review of the literature (Vol. 2). International Monetary Fund.
  23. Kilian, L., & Park, C. (2009). The impact of oil price shocks on the US stock market. International Economic Review, 50(4), 1267-1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2009.00568.x
  24. Kochin, L. A. (1974). Are Future Taxes Anticipated by Consumers?: Comment. Journal of money, credit and banking, 6(3), 385-394. https://doi.org/10.2307/1991176
  25. Kormendi, R. C. (1983). Government debt, government spending, and private sector behavior. The American Economic Review, 73(5), 994-1010.
  26. Leeper, E. M., Sims, C. A., Zha, T., Hall, R. E., & Bernanke, B. S. (1996). What does monetary policy do? Brookings papers on economic activity, 1996(2), 1-78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534619
  27. Phelan, C., & Trejos, A. (2000). The aggregate effects of sectoral reallocations. Journal of Monetary Economics, 45(2), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(99)00056-2
  28. Ramey, V. A., & Shapiro, M. D. (1998). Displaced capital (No. w6775). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  29. Rotemberg, J. J., & Woodford, M. (1992). Oligopolistic pricing and the effects of aggregate demand on economic activity. Journal of political Economy, 100(6), 1153-1207. https://doi.org/10.1086/261857
  30. Sims, C. A. (1992). Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts: The effects of monetary policy. European economic review, 36(5), 975-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(92)90041-T