Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Flow Processes in Rocket Engine Nozzles with Focus on Flow Separation and Side-Loads

Profile image of Jan ÖstlundJan Östlund

2002

visibility

…

description

130 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

The increasing demand for higher performance in rocket launchers promotes the development of nozzles with higher performance, which is basically achieved by increasing the expansion ratio. However, this may lead to flow separation and ensuing unstationary, asymmetric forces, so-called side-loads, which may present life-limiting constraints on both the nozzle itself and other engine components. Substantial gains can be made in the engine performance if this problem can be overcome, and hence different methods of separation control have been suggested, however none has so far been implemented in full scale, due to the uncertainties involved in modelling and predicting the flow phenomena involved. The present thesis presents a comprehensive, up-to-date review of supersonic flow separation and side-loads in internal nozzle flows with ensuing side-loads. In addition to results available in the literature, it also contains previously unpublished material based on this author's work, whose main contributions are (i) discovery the role of transition between different separation patterns for side-load generation, (ii) experimental verification of side-loads due to aeroelastic effects and (iii) contributions to the analysis and scaling of side-loads. A physical description of turbulent shock wave boundary layer interactions is given, based on theoretical concepts, computational results and experimental observation. This is followed by an in-depth discussion of different approaches for predicting the phenomena. This includes methods for predicting shock-induced separation, models for predicting side-load levels and aeroelastic coupling effects. Examples are presented to illustrate the status of various methods, and their advantages and shortcomings are discussed. The third part of the thesis focuses on how to design sub-scale models that are able to capture the relevant physics of the full-scale rocket engine nozzle. Scaling laws like those presented in here are indispensable for extracting side-load correlations from sub-scale tests and applying them to full-scale nozzles. The present work was performed at VAC's Space Propulsion Division within the framework of European space cooperation.

Related papers

Side loads and thermal loads in rocket nozzles. Overview of the CNES-ONERA ATAC programme
philippe reijasse

International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation, 2011

The ATAC group was created in the late 1990s on CNES and ONERA's initiative, and in cooperation with French laboratories and industrials, to investigate aerodynamics issues for space launchers nozzles and blunt bodies. This paper presents a synthesis of the research work done in the frame of the ATAC programme to better understand the flow separation phenomenon in over expanded nozzles.

View PDFchevron_right
Relation between shock unsteadiness and the origin of side-loads inside a thrust optimized parabolic rocket nozzle
Oskar Haidn

Aerospace Science and Technology, 2006

An experimental test campaign has been carried out on a sub-scale thrust optimized parabolic (TOP) nozzle to study the relation between unsteady characteristics of separation and reattachment shocks and the origin of side-loads in rocket nozzles. The study was conducted using wall pressure measurements both in streamwise and circumferential directions, surface oil visualization technique and signals from strain gauges installed on the nozzle bending tube. It is observed that the nozzle pressure ratio at which peaks in maximum rms values occur, for separation and reattachment shocks, coincide with the nozzle pressure ratio at which peaks in strain gauge signal are observed. This clearly demonstrates the unsteady nature of separation and reattachment shocks to be directly related to origin of side-loads in rocket nozzles.

View PDFchevron_right
Assessment of turbulence modeling for gas flow in two-dimensional convergent–divergent rocket nozzle
abdelkarim hegab

Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011

In the present study, the turbulent gas flow dynamics in a two-dimensional convergentdivergent rocket nozzle is numerically predicted and the associated physical phenomena are investigated for various operating conditions. The nozzle is assumed to have impermeable and adiabatic walls with a flow straightener in the upstream side and is connected to a plenum surrounding the nozzle geometry and extended in the downstream direction. In this integrated component model, the inlet flow is assumed a two-dimensional, steady, compressible, turbulent and subsonic. The physics based mathematical model of the considered flow consists of conservation of mass, momentum and energy equations subject to appropriate boundary conditions as defined by the physical problem stated above. The system of the governing equations with turbulent effects is solved numerically using different turbulence models to demonstrate their numerical accuracy in predicting the characteristics of turbulent gas flow in such complex geometry. The performance of the different turbulence models adopted has been assessed by comparing the obtained results of the static wall pressure and the shock position with the available experimental and numerical data. The dimensionless shear stress at the nozzle wall and the separation point are also computed and the flow field is illustrated. The various implemented turbulence models have shown different behavior of the turbulent characteristics. However, the shear-stress transport (SST) k-x model exhibits the best overall agreement with the experimental measurements. In general, the proposed numerical procedure applied in the present paper shows good capability in predicting the physical phenomena and the flow characteristics encountered in such kinds of complex turbulent flow.

View PDFchevron_right
Verification and validation of numerical solutions of two-dimensional reactive flow in rocket engine nozzles
Carlos Henrique Marchi

Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2017

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Highlights  Benchmark results for reactive and non-reactive compressible flows.  Comparison of different physical models (one-species and multi-species) for compressible reactive flows.  Numerical error evaluation for compressible reactive flows.  Effects of physical models on global (thrust, specific impulse) and local (temperature, pressure) variables of interest.  Validation and verification procedures for compressible reactive flows.

View PDFchevron_right
Unsteadiness of Flow Separation and End-Effects Regime in a Thrust-Optimized Contour Rocket Nozzle
Anh Thi Nguyen

Flow Turbulence and Combustion, 2003

Turbulent flow separation in over-expanded rocket nozzles is investigated experimentally in a sub-scale model nozzle fed with cold air and having a thrust-optimized contour. Depending upon the pressure ratio either a free shock separation (FSS) or a restricted shock separation (RSS) is observed with a significant hysteresis between these two flow regimes. It is shown that the RSS configuration may involve several separated regions. Analysis of wall pressure fluctuations give quantitative information on the fluctuating pressure field directly connected with the occurrence of significant side loads. Direct measurements of the evolution of the side loads with respect to the pressure ratio show the occurrence of three distinct peaks which are explained by the wall pressure fluctuations measurements.

View PDFchevron_right
Three-dimensional simulation of rocket nozzles with multi-jet interaction using shock-unsteadiness model
Pratikkumar Raje

2019

The interaction of supersonic underexpanded exhaust jets for a four-nozzle clustered rocket configuration is studied using three-dimensional RANS simulations. Such interactions can lead to reversed flow of the nozzle exhaust gases towards the base, and result in high pressure and heat loads on the vehicle. Multi-jet interaction flow fields are characterised by a number of shocks and expansion waves, along with turbulent shear layers enclosing subsonic recirculating zones. The complexity of the flowfield is broken down by identifying various viscous/inviscid interactions, with particular focus on the interaction of turbulence with shockwaves. The shock-unsteadiness k-ω turbulence model is used to capture the physics of shock-turbulence interaction, and its effect on the multi-jet flow field.

View PDFchevron_right
Slip-model performance for underexpanded micro-scale rocket nozzle flows
Pepe Hermida

Journal of Thermal Science, 2007

Gasdynamics in micro-rocket engines for satellites involves complex aspects regarding how to perform efficient simulations. It is well known that gas flow in the continuum regime -very low Knudsen (Kn) numbers-is accurately computed with Navier-Stokes solvers. Nevertheless, rarefaction due to the small geometrical scale may lead the continuum description to be inaccurate or even fail. This is the situation found in aerospace Micro-ElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS), where the characteristic length scale of the flow approaches the molecular mean free path, thus invalidating the continuum description and enforcing the use of particle methods, like the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC), to deal with the non-equilibrium regions. Within the slip-regime (0.01<Kn<∼0.1) both approaches, continuum and particle-based, seem to behave well in terms of accuracy. The present study summarizes the implementation and results obtained with a 2 nd -order slip boundary condition in a Navier-Stokes solver to address the rarefaction near the nozzle walls. Its assessment and application to a cold-gas micro-scale conical nozzle of 300μm throat diameter, discharging into the low-pressure freestream, constitutes the major aim of the work. The slip-model incorporates the velocity slip with thermal creep and temperature jump, thus permitting to deal with non-isothermal flows as well. Results show that the gas experiences an intense rarefaction in the lip vicinity, pointing to the limits of model validity. Furthermore, a strong Mach deceleration is observed, attributed to the rather thick subsonic boundary layer and supersonic bulk heating caused by the viscous dissipation, in contrast with the expansion to occur in large rocket nozzles during underexpanded operation.

View PDFchevron_right
Modeling & Simulation of Rocket Nozzle
Nirmith K Mishra

This project develops a computer code which uses the Method of Characteristics and the Stream Function to define high efficiency nozzle contours for isentropic, inviscid, irrotational supersonic flows of any working fluid for any user-defined exit Mach number. The contours are compared to theoretical isentropic area ratios for the selected fluid and desired exit Mach number. The accuracy of the nozzle to produce the desired exit Mach number is also checked. The flow field of the nozzles created by the code are independently checked with the commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code ANSYS-FLUENT. ANSYSFLUENT predictions are used to verify the isentropic flow assumption and that the working fluid reached the user-defined desired exit Mach number.

View PDFchevron_right
Fluid structure interaction phenomena in highly over-expanded rocket nozzle
MohAmed SELLAM

The aim of the present study is to analyze the aeroelastic stability of a supersonic nozzle in over-expanded conditions, by using an aeroelastic stability model. To reach this objective, a research software written in Fortran, has been developed for 2D and 3D nozzle configurations. The obtained results are compared and validated for the 2D and 3D cases with those of previously studies.

View PDFchevron_right
Two Dimensional CFD Analysis on Different Rocket Nozzles
Yogesh Bhawarker

Graduate Research in Engineering and Technology

The reduction of Earth-to-orbit launch costs in conjunction with an increase in launcher reliability and operational Efficiency is the key demands on future space transportation systems, like single-stage-to-orbit vehicles (SSTO). The realization of these vehicles strongly depends on the performance of the engines, which should deliver high performance with low system complexity. Performance data for rocket engines are practically always lower than the theoretically attainable values because of imperfections in the mixing, combustion, and expansion of the propellants. The main part of the project addresses different nozzle concepts with improvements in performance as compared to conventional nozzles achieved by Different Mach numbers, thus, by minimizing losses caused by over- or under expansion. The design of different nozzle shapes and flow simulation is done in gambit and fluent software’s respectively for various parameters

View PDFchevron_right

References (161)

  1. R Moelder, A., Gluamhussein, A., Timofeev, E., and Voinovich, P.,'' Focusing of Conical Shocks at the Centreline of Symmetry'', Paper 5601, Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Shock Waves, Great Keppel Island, Australia, July 1997
  2. R Frey, M. and Hagemann, G., ''Status of Flow Separation Prediction in Rocket Nozzles'', AIAA 98- 3619, 1998
  3. R Frey, M. and Hagemann, G., ''Flow Separation and Side-Loads in Rocket Nozzles'', AIAA 99- 2815, 1999
  4. R Terhardt, M., Hagemann, G., and Frey, M., ''Flow Separation and Side-Load Behaviour of the Vulcain Engine'', AIAA 99-2762, 1999
  5. R Mattsson, J. (changed name to Östlund 1999), Högman, U., and Torngren, L., ''A Sub-Scale Test Programme on Investigation of Flow Separation and Side-Loads in Rocket Nozzles'', Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics of Space Vehicles, ESA-ESTEC, Netherlands, November 24-26, 1998
  6. R Östlund J., Bigert M., ''A Subscale Investigation on Side-Loads in Sea Level Rocket Nozzles", AIAA 99-2759, June 1999
  7. R Reijasse, P.,Servel, P., and Hallard, R., ''Synthesis of the 1998-1999 ONERA Works in the FSCD Working Group'', ONERA RTS 49/4361 DAFE/Y, December 1999
  8. R Frey, M., Stark, R., and Ciezki, H., ''Subscale Nozzle Testing at the P6.2 Test Stand'', AIAA paper, to be published at the 36th Joint Propulsion Conference, July 2000
  9. R Hagemann, G., Immich. H., Dumnov, G., and Nguyen, Th., ''Advanced Rocket Nozzles'', Journal of Power and Propulsion, Vol. 14, No. 5, September -October 1998
  10. R Oates, G. C., " Aerothermodynamics of Gas Turbine and Rocket Propulsion", New York, AIAA, 1984
  11. R Shapiro A. H., " The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow, Vol I, The Ronald Press Co., New York, 1953.
  12. R Frey, H. M. , Nickerson G. R. "TDK -Two Dimensional Kinetic Reference Program", SEA Inc. NAS8-36863,1989.
  13. R Malina, F. J., "Characteristics of the Rocket Motor Based on the Theory of Perfect Gases", J. Frankling Inst., Vol. 230, 1940, pp. 433-454.
  14. R Guderley G., Hantsch E., "Beste Formen für Achsensymmetrische Überschallschubdüsen", Zeitschrift für Flugwissenschaften 3 ,pp. 305-313, 1955
  15. R Guderley G., " On Rao's Method for the Computation of Exhaust Nozzles", Zeitschrift für Flugwissenschaften 12 ,pp. 345-350, 1959
  16. R Rao G. V. R. , " Exhaust Nozzle Contour for Optimum Thrust" , Jet Propulsion , Vol. 28, No. 6, 1958
  17. R Shmyglevsky Yu. D., "Some variational problems in the gas dynamics of axially symmetric supersonic flows", (In Russian), Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 21, No. 2,1957
  18. R Shmyglevsky Yu. D., "A variational problem in the gas dynamics of axially symmetric supersonic flow", (In Russian), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSR 113, No. 3,1957
  19. R 19 Shmyglevsky Yu. D., "Supersonic profiles with minimum drag", (In Russian), Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 22, No. 2, pp. 269-273 ,1958
  20. R Shmyglevsky Yu. D., "Some gas dynamic variation problems", (In Russian), M.: VTs AN USSR, 1963
  21. R Huzel D. K., Huang D. H., "Modern Engineering for Design of Liquid Proppelant Rocket Engines", Revised Edition. AIAA Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 147. Washington, DC: AIAA 1992.
  22. Rao G. V. R. , " Approximation of Optimum Thrust Nozzle Contour" , ARS Journal , Vol. 30, No. 6 , p. 561, 1960.
  23. R Rao G. V. R., A. L. Dang, " Thrust Optimization of Nozzle Contour Including Finite Rate Chemical Kinetics", AIAA 92-3729, July 1992.
  24. R Ahlberg J. H., Hamilton S., Migdal D., Nilson E. N., "Truncated Perfect Nozzles in Optimum Nozzle Design" ARS Journal, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp.614-620, May 1961.
  25. R Ponomarev N. V., "Direct optimisation of rocket engine nozzle contours", (In Russia), Raketno- Kosmicheskaya Tekhnika: Raketney Dvigateli I Energeticheskie Ustanovki, Issue 2 (135), NIITP 1992.
  26. R Dumnov G. E., Nikulin G. Z., Ponomarev N. B., "A study of Promising Rocket Nozzles", (In Russian), NITTP, YDK 533.697.4
  27. R Dritov G. V., Tishin A. P. "On the contouring of nozzles operating with condensate particles", (In Russian), Izv.AN.USSR.MZhg No.1, 1971.
  28. R Davis D. K., "Investigation of optimisation techniques for solid rocket motor nozzle contour", AIAA 82-1188, 1982
  29. R Hussaini M. M., Korte J. J., "Investigation of Low-Reynolds-Number Rocket Nozzle design Using PNS-based Optimizartion Procedure", NASA Technical Memorandum 110295, 1996.
  30. R Prandtl, L., ''Ueber Fluessigkeitsbewegung bei sehr kleiner Reibung'' (On Fluid Movement at Low Friction, in German), International Mathematical Congress, Heidelberg, 1904
  31. R Prandtl, L., ''Fuehrer durch die Stroemungslehre'' (Text Book on Fluid Dynamics, in German), Friedrich Vieweg & Son, Braunschweig, 1960
  32. R Schlichting, H., and Gersten, K., ''Boundary Layer Theory'', Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1997
  33. R Donaldson C., Lange R., "Study of the Pressure Rise Across Shock Waves required to Separate Laminar and Turbulent Boundary Layer". NACA Technical Note 2770, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field, March 1952.
  34. R Elfstrom G., "Turbulent hypersonic flow at a wedge-compression corner", Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 53, part 1, 1972, pp. 113-127.
  35. R Chapman D., Huehn D., Larson H., "Investigation of Separated Flows in Supersonic and Subsonic Streams with Emphasis on the Effect of Transition", NACA Report 1536, Ames Aeronautical Laboratory, Moffet Field, 1958.
  36. R Hamed A., Kumar A., "Hypersonic Flow Separation in Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interactions", American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 92-Gt-205, 1992.
  37. R Hayashi M., Aso S., Tan A., " Fluctuation of Heat Transfer in Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer interaction", AIAA Journal, Vol. 27, No. 4, April 1989, pp. 399-404.
  38. R Holden M., "Shock Wave-Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction in Hypersonic Flow", AIAA 72-74, San Diego, January 1972.
  39. R Horstman C., Settles G., Vas I., Bogdonoff S., Hung C., " Reynolds Number Effects on Shock-Wave Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Interactions", AIAA Journal, Vol. 15, No. 8, August 1977, pp. 1152- 1158.
  40. R Settles G., "An experimental study of compressible turbulent boundary-layer separation at high Reynolds number", Ph. D. Dissertation, Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences Dep., Princeton University, September 1975.
  41. R Settles G., "Details of a Shock-Separated Turbulent Boundary Layer at a Compression Corner", AIAA Journal, Vol. 14, No. 12, December 1976, pp. 1709-1715.
  42. R Settles G., Fitzpatrick T., Bogdonoff S., "Detailed Study of Attached and Separated Compression Corner Flowfields at high Reynolds Number Supersonic Flow", AIAA Journal, Vol. 17, No. 6, June 1979, pp. 579-585.
  43. R Tyler D., Shapiro A., "Pressure Rise Required for Separation in Interaction Between Turbulent Boundary Layer and Shock Wave", Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 12, December 1953, pp 858-860.
  44. R Panov, Yu A., and Shvets, A.I., ''Separation of Turbulent Boundary Layer in Supersonic Flow'', Prikladnaya meklanika 1, 1966
  45. R Zukoski, E.E., ''Turbulent Boundary Layer Separation in Front of a Forward Facing Step'', AIAA Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, January 1967
  46. R Horstman C., "Prediction of Hypersonic Shock-Wave/Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Interaction Flow", AIAA 87-1367, Honolulu, June 1987.
  47. R Kuntz D., Amatucci V., Addy A., "Turbulent Boundary-Layer Properties Downstream of the Shock- Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction", AIAA Journal, Vol. 25, No. 5, May 1987, pp. 668-675.
  48. R Lange R., "Present Status of Information Relative to Prediction of Shock-Induced Boundary-Layer Separation", NACA Technical Note 3065, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field, February 1954.
  49. R Mikulla V., Horstman C., "Turbulent Measurments in Hypersonic Shock-Wave Boundary-Layer Interaction Flows", AIAA Journal, Vol. 14, No. 5, May 1976, pp. 568-575.
  50. R Modarress D., Johnson D., "Investigation of Shock Induced Separation of a Turbulent Boundary Layer Using Laser Velocimetry", AIAA 76-374, San Diego, July 1976.
  51. R Selig M., Andrepoulos J., Muck K., Dussauge J., Smits A., "Turbulence Structure in a Shock Wave/turbulent Boundary-Layer Interaction", AIAA Journal, vol. 27, No. 7, July 1989, pp. 862-869.
  52. R Back R., Cuffel R.," Changes in Heat Transfer from Turbulent Boundary Layers Interacting with Shock Waves and Expansion Waves", Technical Note, AIAA Journal, Vol.8, No. 10, October 1970, pp. 1871-1873.
  53. R Back L., Cuffel R., " Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interactions with and without Surface Cooling", AIAA Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, April 1976, pp.526-532.
  54. R Spaid F., Frishett J., "Incipient Separation of a Supersonic, turbulent Boundary Layer, Including Effects of Heat Transfer", AIAA Journal, Vol. 10, No. 7, July 1972, pp. 915-922.
  55. R Muck K., Andrepoulos J., Dussauge J., "Unsteady Nature of Shock-Wave/Turbulent Boundary- Layer Interaction", AIAA Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, February 1988, pp. 179-187.
  56. R Plotkin K., "Shock wave oscillation driven by turbulent boundary layer fluctuations", AIAA Journal, Vol. 13., No. 8, August 1975, pp. 1036-1040.
  57. R Andreopoulos J., Muck K., "Some new aspects of the shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction in compression ramp-flows". Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 180, 1987, pp.405-428.
  58. R Coe C., Chyu W., Dods J., " Pressure Fluctuations Underlying Attached and Separated Supersonic turbulent Boundary Layers and Shock Waves", AIAA 73-996, Seattle, October 1973.
  59. R Dolling D., Murphy M., "Unsteadiness of the Separation Shock Wave Structure in a Supersonic Compression Ramp Flowfield", AIAA Journal, Vol. 21, No. 12, December 1983, pp. 1628-1634.
  60. R Dolling D., Or C., "Unsteadiness of the shock wave structure in attached and separated compression ramp flows" Experiments in Fluids 3, Springer Verlag, 1985, pp. 24-32.
  61. R Erengil M., Dolling D., "Unsteady Wave Structure Near Separation in a Mach 5 Compression Ramp Interaction", AIAA Journal, Vol. 29, No. 5, May 1991, pp. 728-735.
  62. R Erengil M., Dolling D., "Correlation of separation shock motion with pressure fluctuations in the incoming boundary layer", AIAA Journal, Vol. 29, No. 11, November 1991, pp. 1868-1877.
  63. R Kistler, M., ''Fluctuating Wall Pressure under a Separated Supersonic Flow'', Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 36, No. 3, March 1964
  64. R Gonsalez, J., Dolling, D. S., "Effects of Interaction Sweepback on the Dynamics of Shock-Induced Turbulent Separation", AIAA 93-0776.
  65. R Smits A., Muck K., "Experimental study of three shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions", Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 182, 1987, pp. 291-314.
  66. R Spina E., Smits A., Robinson S., " The physics of turbulent boundary layers", Annular Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 26, 1994, pp. 287-319.
  67. R Thomas F., Putnam C., Chu H., " On the mechanism of unsteady shock oscillation in the shock wave/ turbulent boundary layer interactions", Experimental Fluids, Vol. 18, 1994, pp. 69-81.
  68. R Dolling, D.S., Bogdonoff, S. M., "An experimental investigation of the unsteady behaviour of blunt fin-induced shock wave turbulent boundary layer separation", AIAA 81-1287, June 1981.
  69. R Robertson, J. E., "Prediction of In-Flight Fluctuating Pressure Environments Including Protuberance Induced Flows", Wyle Laboratories Research Staff Rept. WR71-10, March 1971.
  70. R Schmisseur, J. D., Dolling D. S., "Fluctuating Wall Pressures near Separation in Highly Swept Turbulent Interactions", AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No.6, June 1994, pp. 1151-1157,
  71. R Dolling, D., Clemens, N., "Investigation of Physics of Large-Scale Unsteadiness of Shock Induced Turbulent Separation Using Planar Laser Imaging Methods", Final progress report to U.S Army Research Office, Report No. ARO-32560.1-EG, May 2000.
  72. R Beresh, S. "The Effect of the Incoming Turbulent Boundary Layer on a Shock-Induced Separated Flow using Particle Image Velocimetry", Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 1999.
  73. R Beresh, S, Clemens N., Dolling D., "The Relationship Between Upstream Turbulent Boundary layer Velocity Fluctuations and Separation Shock Unsteadiness", AIAA 99-0295, 37 th Aerospace Meeting, Reno, NV, 1999.
  74. R Hunt, D., Nixon, D, "A Very Large-Eddy Simulation of an Unsteady Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer interaction", AIAA 95-2212, 1995.
  75. R Adams, N., "DNS of Shock Boundary-Layer Interaction-Preliminary Results for Compression Ramp Flow", Annual Research Briefs 1997, pp. 329-338, Center for turbulent Research, Stanford University.
  76. R Adams, N., Stolz, S., Honein A., Mahesk, K., "Analysis and Subgrid Modeling of Shock- Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction", Proceedings of the Summer Program 1998, pp.337-349, November 1998, Center for turbulent Research, Stanford University.
  77. R 77 Delery, J., and Marvin. J.G., ''Shock-Wave Boundary Layer Interactions'', AGARD No. 280, February 1986, ISBN 92-835-1519-6
  78. R Erdos J., Pallone A., "Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction and Flow Separation", Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute Procs., Stanford University Press, 1962.
  79. R Salikuddin, M., "Unsteady Pressures on Exhaust Nozzle Interior Surfaces -Empirical Correlations for Prediction", DGLR/AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, 14th, Aachen, Germany, May 1992, Proceedings. Vol. 2 (A93-19126 05-71), Bonn, Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Luft-und Raumfahrt, pp. 873-881, 1992.
  80. R Darren, R., Hidalgo, H., "Fluctuating Pressure Analysis of a 2-D SSME Nozzle Air Flow Test", In its Thirteenth Workshop for Computational Fluid Dynamic Applications in Rocket Propulsion and Launch Vehicle Technology, Huntsville, Alabama, p 723-743 (SEE N96-29750 11-34), April 1995
  81. R Foster, C., and Cowles, F., ''Experimental Study of Gas Flow Separation in Overexpanded Exhaust Nozzles for Rocket Motors'', JPL Progress Report 4-103, May 1949
  82. R Green, L. ''Flow Separation in Rocket Nozzles, ARS Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, January -February 1953
  83. R Summerfield, M., Foster, C., and Swan, W., ''Flow Separation in Overexpanded Supersonic Exhaust Nozzles'', Jet Propulsion, Vol. 24, September-October 1954
  84. R Campbell, C. and Farley, J., ''Performance of Several Conical Convergent-Divergent Rocket Type Exhaust Nozzles'', NASA TN D-467, September 1960
  85. R Schilling T. W., ''Flow Separation in Rocket Nozzle'', M. S. Thesis, University of Buffalo, June 1962
  86. R Kalt S., and Badal D., ''Conical Rocket Nozzle Performance Under Flow Separated Condition'', Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 2, No. 3, May 1965
  87. R Arens, M., and Spiegler, E, Shock-Induced Boundary Layer Separation in Overexpanded Conical Exhaust Nozzles'', AIAA Journal, Vol. 1, No. 3, March 1963
  88. R Sunley, H., and Ferriman, D., ''Jet Separation in Conical Nozzles'', Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 68, December 1964
  89. R Lawrence, R.A., ''Symmetrical and Unsymmetrical Separation in Supersonic Nozzles'', Research report 67-1, Southern Methodist University, April 1967
  90. R Chen, C., Chakravarchy, S., and Hung, C., ''Numerical Investigation of Separated Nozzle Flows'', AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 9, September 1994
  91. R Nasuti, F., and Onofri, M., ''Viscous and Inviscid Vortex Generation During Nozzle Flow Transients'', AIAA 96-0076, June 1996
  92. R Nasuti, F., and Onofri, M., ''Viscous and Inviscid Vortex Generation During Start-Up of Rocket Nozzles'', AIAA Journal, Vol. 36, No. 5, May 1998
  93. R Onofri, F., and Nasuti, M., ''The Physical Origin of Side-Loads in Rocket Nozzles'', AIAA 99- 2587, July 1999
  94. R Schmucker, R., ''Flow Processes in Overexpanding Nozzles of Chemical Rocket Engines'' (published in German), Report TB-7,-10,-14, Technical University Munich, 1973
  95. R Nave, L. H., and Coffey, G. A., ''Sea-Level Side-Loads in High Area Ratio Rocket Engines'', AIAA 73-1284, 1973
  96. R Gribben, B., Cantariti, F., Badcock, K., and Richards, B., ''Numerical Study of an Underexpanded Jet'', Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics of Space Vehicles, ESA-ESTEC, Netherlands, November 24-26, 1998
  97. R Welsh, F., ''Electron Beam Fluorescence Measurements of Shock Reflection Hysteresis in an Underexpanded Supersonic Jet'', Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Shock Waves, Great Keppel Island, Australia, July 1997
  98. R NASA Space Vehicle Design Criteria (Chemical Propulsion), ''Liquid Rocket Engine Nozzles'', SP- 8120, July 1976
  99. R Crocco, L., and Probstein, R., ''The Peak Pressure Rise Across an Oblique Shock Emerging from a Turbulent Boundary Layer Over a Plane Surface'', Princeton University (Princeton. NJ), March 1964
  100. R Carriere, P., '' Remarques sur les Méthodes de Calcul des Effets de la Viscosité dans les Tuyères Propulsives'' (Comments on computational methods of viscous effects in propulsion nozzles, in French), DGRR/WGLR Symposium, Bad Godesberg, also published as ONERA TP 408, October 1966
  101. R Dumnov, G.E., ''Unsteady Side-Loads acting on the Nozzle with Developed Separation Zone'', AIAA 96-3220, 1996
  102. R Pekkari, L.-O., ''Aeroelastic Stability of Supersonic Nozzles with Separated Flow'', AIAA 93-2588, June 1993
  103. R Pekkari, L.-O., ''Aeroelastic Analysis of Side-Loads in Supersonic Nozzles with Separated Flow", AIAA 94-3377, June 1994
  104. R Östlund J., Jaran M., "Assessment of Turbulence Models in Overexpanded Rocket Nozzle Flow Simulations", AIAA 99-2583, June 1999
  105. R Hagemman G., Terhardt M.,.
  106. Frey M., Reijasse P, Onofri M, Nasuti F., Östlund J., "Flow Separation and Side-Loads in Rocket Nozzles",4th International Symposium on Liquid Space Propulsion, March 12-15, 2000, DLR Lampoldshausen R Koppenwallner G., "Development of Scaling Laws for Nozzle Aerodynaic Design", HTG Report 92- 8, June 1992
  107. R Stanke H., "Test Report on The Results on HM60-SubScale Test Series 3", Vulcain Ne Project Report HM RT 110 0000 501, September 1986.
  108. R Östlund, J., Damgaard T., Frey M., "Side-Load Phenomena in Highly Overexpanded Rocket Nozzles", AIAA-2001-3684, July 2001.
  109. R Östlund (former Mattsson), J. "Test Synthesis -Reference and Polygon Modular nozzle", VOLVO Internal Report, Dock. No. SV RE 114 0000 E 2005 VOLV, Reg. No. 6600-98-3015, 1999-02-24.
  110. R Frey, M., "Behandlung von Strömungsproblemen in Raketendüsen bei Überexpansion", (in German), Ph.D. dissertation, Insitut für Aerodynamik und Gasdynamik Univesität Stuttgart, ISBN 3- 8265-8806-1, 2001.
  111. R Carrière, P., Sirieix, M., Solignac, J.-L., "Propértiés de similitude des phénomènes de décollement laminaires ou turbulents en écoulemnt supersonique non uniforme", 12 th International Congress of Applied Mechanics, Stanford University, August 1968 and ONERA TP N°659F, 1968.
  112. R Dumnov, G. E., Nikulin, G. Z., Voinov, A. L., Zyuzin, V. I., "Nozzle Flow Separation and Unsteady Side Loads", Conference on Propulsive Flows in Space Transportation System, pp. 798-816, Bordeaux, September 1995
  113. R Lewis, J. E., Kubota, T., Lees, L., "Experimental investigation of supersonic laminar, two- dimensional boundary layer separation in a compression corner with and without wall cooling", AIAA J. 6, 7-14, 1968.
  114. R Kudryavtsev, V. M., "Fundamentals of theory and calculations of liquid rocket engines", (in Russian), Moscow, High School, 1975.
  115. R Malik, T. I. Tagirov, R. K., "A semiempirical method for calculating separated turbulent flow in a conical Laval nozzle in the reexpansion mode", (in Russian), Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Izvestiia, Mekhanika Zhidkosti i Gaza , pp. 60-66, Dec. 01, 1988
  116. R Abramovich, G. N., "The Theory of Turbulent Jets", The MIT Press, 1963
  117. R Girard, S., Alziary T., "Fluctuations Measurements in Axisymetric Sub-Scale Nozzle", European Seminar on Rocket Nozzles, Paris, October 1998.
  118. R Gonsalez, J., Dolling, D. S., "Effects of Interaction Sweepback on the Dynamics of Shock-Induced Turbulent Separation", AIAA 93-0776, AIAA 31 st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, January, 1993
  119. R Kwan W., "Aeroelastic effects on a bended conical nozzle", DLR-IB 645-2001-06, DLR Internal Report, 2001
  120. R Welch P. D., "The Use of Fast Fourier Transform for the Estimation of Power Spectra: A Method Based on Time Avaraging Over Short, Modified Periodograms", IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust., Vol. AU-15, June 1967, pp.70-73.
  121. R Dolling, D. S., Dussauge, J. P. "Fluctuating Wall Pressure Measurements", Ch. 8, Agardograph 315, 1990, A Survey of Measurements and Measuring Techniques in Rapidly Distorted Compressible Turbulent Boundary Layers.
  122. R Tomita, T., Takahashi, M., Ueda, S., Tamura, H., Aoki, K., "Visualization of the Formation of Separation Bubbles on a Bell-Shaped Nozzle Surface in Relation to Serious Side-Load", AIAA 2001-3559, 2001.
  123. R Stark, R., Kwan, W., Quessard, F., Hagemann, G., Terhardt, M., "Rocket Nozzle Cold-Gas Test Campaigns for Plume Investigations", 4 th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, Capua, Italy, October 15-18, 2001.
  124. R Hagemann, G., Alting, J., Preclik, D., "Scalability Discussion for Rocket Nozzle Flows Based on Subscale and Full-Scale Testing", 4 th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, Capua, Italy, October 15-18, 2001.
  125. R McLachlan, B. G., Bell, J. H., "Pressure Sensitive Paint in Aerodynamic Testing", Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science (0894-1777), vol. 10, No. 4, May 1995, p. 470-485.
  126. R Lepicovsky, J., Bencic, T., J., " Use of pressure sensitive paints for diagnostics in turbomachinery flows with shocks", ISABE-2001-1142, ISOABE, ISABE -15 th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, , Bangalore, India, Sept. 3-7, 2001
  127. R Taghavi, R., Raman, G., Bencic, T., "Pressure sensitive paint demonstrates relationship between ejector wall pressure and aerodynamic performance", Experiments in Fluids (0723-4864), vol. 26, no. 6, May 1999, p. 481-487
  128. R Lepicovsky, J., Bencic, T., J., Bruckner, R., J., " Application of Pressure Sensitive Paint to Confined Flow at Mach Number 2.5", NASA no. 19980197323,NASA/TM-1998-107527, E-10842, NAS 1.15:107527, AIAA Paper 97-3214
  129. R Sakaue, H., Gregory, J. W., Sullivan, J. P., Raghu, S., "Pressure Sensitive Paint for Unsteady Flow Fields", AIAA Paper 2001-0554, AIAA, 39 th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 8-11, 2001.
  130. R Girard, S., Alziary de Roquefort, T., "Measurements of side loads in an overexpanded parabolic nozzle", Laboratoire d'Etudes Aérodynamiques, CEAT, Poitiers, March 1999.
  131. R Reada, D., C., " Wilder M., C.," Shear-sensitive liquid crystal coating method applied through transparent test surfaces, AIAA Journal (0001-1452), vol. 39, no. 1, Jan. 2001, p. 195-197
  132. R Reijass, Ph, Morzenski, L., Naudin, P., Géneau, F., "Fluctuating Side-Load Measurements in Overexpanded Subscale Rocket-Nozzles", AIAA 2001-3557.
  133. R Harris, C., M., Crede, C., E., "Shock and Vibration Handbook", McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1976, ISBN 0- 07-026799-5
  134. R Bendat, J., S., Piersol, A., G., "Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures", 3 rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000, ISBN: 0-471-31733-0.
  135. R Gogish, L., V., "Investigation of Short Supersonic Nozzles", AN SSSR, Izvestiya, Mechanica Zidkosti i Gaza, 1966, No. 2, pp.175-180.
  136. R Hoffman, J., D., "Design of Compressed Truncated Perfect Nozzles", AIAA-85-1172, 1985.
  137. R Olsson, J. , personal communication, January 2002.
  138. R Mattsson (Östlund since 1999), J. ,"FSC Final Evaluation Report", Volvo Aero Corporation Internal Report, GSTP NT 114 00 E 2011 VOLV, Reg. No. 6600-98-1651, June 1998.
  139. R Mattsson (Östlund since 1999), J. , "Separation Analysis in Conventional Bell Nozzles", European Seminar on Rocket Nozzle Flows, CNES, Paris, 12-14 October 1998.
  140. R Knight, D., D., Degrez, G., "Shock Wave Boundary layer Interactions in High Mach Number Flows, A Critical Survey of Current Numerical Prediction Capabilities", AGARD Advisor Report 319, Vol II, pp. 1.1-1.35, December 1998.
  141. R Thivet, F., Knight, D., D., Zheltovodov, A., A., Maksimov, A., I., "Some Insights in Turbulence Modeling for Corssing.Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions" AIAA Paper 2000-0131, AIAA 38th Aerospace Science Meeting & Exhibit", Reno Nevada, 10-13 January 2000.
  142. R Schumann, U., "Realisability of Reynolds Stress Turbulence Models", Phys. Fluids, Vol. 20, 1977, pp. 721-725.
  143. R Lumley, J., L., "Computational Modeling of Turbulent Flows", Advances in Applied Mechanics, Vol. 18, Academic Press, 1978, pp. 123-176.
  144. R Moore, J., G., Moore, J., "Realizability in Two-Equation Turbulence Models", AIAA Paper 99- 3779, AIAA 30th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, Virginia, 28 June-1July 1999.
  145. R Durbine, P., A., "On the k-ε Stagnation point Anomaly", Int. J. Heat & Fluid Flow, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1996, pp. 89-90.
  146. R Behnia, M., Parneix, S., Durbin, P., A., "Simulation of Jet Impingment Heat Transfer with the k-ε - ν2 Model", Annual Research Briefs 1996, Center for Turbulence Research, California, December 1996, pp. 3-16, also at http://ctr.stanford.edu/ResBriefs96/behnia.ps.Z
  147. R Coakley, T., J., "Turbulence Modeling for Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations", AIAA Paper 83- 1693, Danvers, Massachussetts, June 1983.
  148. R Coakley, T., J., Huang, P., G., "Turbulence Modeling for High Speed Flows", AIAA Paper 92-0436, AIAA 30th Aerospace Science Meeting & Exhibit", Reno Nevada, 6-9 January 1992.
  149. R Menter, F., R., "Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications", AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, August 1994, pp. 1598-1605, also AIAA Paper 93-2906 and NASA- TM-103975, October 1992.
  150. R Eriksson, L.-E., "A Third-Order Accurate Upwind-Biased Finite-Volume Scheme for Unsteady Compressible Viscous Flow", VOLVO Internal Report, VAC 9370-154, 1990.
  151. R Eriksson, L.-E., "Development and Validation of Highly Modular Flow Solver Versions in G2DFLOW and G3DFLOW Series for Compressible Viscous Reacting Flow", VOLVO Internal Report, VAC 9970-1161, 1995.
  152. R VOLVO Internal Report, "Vulcan 2+ NE, TN, CFD Simulations", Prog. Nr. SV NT 114 0000 E2026, Reg. No. 6600-99-1701, Issue Date 2000-09-26.
  153. R Ghosal, S., "Mathematical and Physical Constraints on Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulence", AIAA Journal, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 425-433, April 1999.
  154. R Jameson, A., "the present Status, Challenges and Future Developments in Computational Fluid Dynamics", Proceedings of 12 th Australasian Conference on Fluid Dynamics, Sydney, December 1995.
  155. R Speziale, G., C., "Turbulence Modelling for time-Dependent RANS and VLES A Review", AIAA Journal, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 173-184, February 1998.
  156. R Fureby, C., Grinstein, F., F., "Monotonically Integrated Large Eddy Simulation of Free Shear Flows", AIAA Journal, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 544-556, May 1999.
  157. R Urbin, G., Knight, D., Zheltovodov, A., A., "Large Eddy Simulation of a Supersonic compression Corner", AIAA Paper 2000-0298.
  158. R Terhardt, M., Hagemann G., Frey, M., "Flow Separation and Side Load Behaviour of Truncated Ideal Rocket Nozzles", AIAA-2001-3686, Salt Lake City, July 2001.
  159. R Reijass Ph., Morzenski L., Blacodon D., Birkemeyer J., " Flow Separation Experimental Analysis in Overexpanded Subscale Rocket Nozzles"AIAA-2001-3556, Salt Lake City, July 2001.
  160. R Reijass Ph., Birkemeyer J., "Semi-Empirical Flow Separation Model for Subscale Nozzles", Presented at the 4 th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, Capua, Italy, October 15-18, 2001
  161. R Torngren, L., "Correlation Between Outer Flow and Internal Nozzle Pressure Fluctuations", Presented at the 4 th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, Capua, Italy, October 15-18, 2001

Related papers

Structural Analysis of Rocket Nozzle
mohan banoth

2018

View PDFchevron_right
Scale analysis and experimental observations of shock-induced turbulent boundary layer separation in nozzles
Russell Keanini

European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, 2007

View PDFchevron_right
Development of an Aeroelastic Modeling Capability for Transient Nozzle Flow Analysis
Yen-sen Chen

Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2014

View PDFchevron_right
Paper: ASAT-13-PP-13 Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Gas Flow in a Solid Rocket Motor Nozzle
Abdelkarim Hegab
View PDFchevron_right
ADAPTIVE SIMULATION OF THE INTERNAL FLOW IN A ROCKET NOZZLE
M. Storti, L. Garelli, Gustavo Rios

Latin American applied research Pesquisa aplicada latino americana = Investigación aplicada latinoamericana

View PDFchevron_right
Design and analysis of a rocket C-D nozzle
DURLAB DAS

International journal of health sciences

View PDFchevron_right
Effects of chemical and physical models on a one-dimensional flow in a rocket nozzle
Carlos Henrique Marchi

Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Sciences and Applications, 2008

View PDFchevron_right
Numerical Analysis of Convergent-Divergent Angles and Operating Conditions Impact on Rocket Nozzle Performance Parameters
Nabila Alili
View PDFchevron_right
Modeling and Simulation of a Supersonic Convergent Divergent Nozzle Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
Asif Kabir

5th International Conference on Engineering, Research, Innovation and Education (ICERIE), 2019At: Shahjalal University of Science & Technology (SUST), Sylhet, bangladesh, 2019

View PDFchevron_right
An Introduction to Thrust-Vectored Aircraft Nozzles
Erich Wilson

2013

View PDFchevron_right
CFD analysis of rocket nozzle
Akash Kaparthy
View PDFchevron_right
Design and numerical analysis on supersonic rocket nozzle
Dr Chennabasappa Hampali

Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 2022

View PDFchevron_right
Transient Three-Dimensional Analysis of Nozzle Side Load in Regeneratively Cooled Engines
ten ng

41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &amp; Exhibit, 2005

View PDFchevron_right
SIMULATION OF SUPERSONIC FLOW CHARACTERISTICS IN A GROOVED DIVERGENT ROCKET NOZZLE USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
IJRAME Journal, Douglas Boah

IJRAME PUBLICATIONS, 2025

View PDFchevron_right
Simulation of Convergent Divergent Rocket Nozzle using CFD Analysis
IOSR Journals
View PDFchevron_right
Pressure Variations in Rocket Nozzles. Part 1: Direct Asymptotic Predictions
Brian Maicke

& Proceedings 저널· 프로시딩즈| 기술보고서| 해외연구초록| Reference DB| 공학설계| 부품규격| 항공우주특허| 원문신청| 논문스크랩| 연구자 DB 해외개발| 국내개발| 우주기술전략지도| AIAA 연차보고서| 저널번역| 일본항공우주| 국내연구성과| IP 제공정보| 부품개발현황 ARIC 용어사전| 교육도서| 인물사건| Web Link| 항공 우주 Spec 항공우주기사| 학술행사안내| 과제· 기관소식| 해외개발 소식| 뉴스레터 자유게시판| 오피니언| 실험실/업체 홍보| 갤러리

View PDFchevron_right
CFD Analysis Of Rocket Engine Nozzle
IJAERS Journal
View PDFchevron_right
Verification of Numerical Solution of Two-Dimensional Reactive Flow in Rocket Engine Nozzles
Carlos Henrique Marchi

2007

View PDFchevron_right
Numerical calculation of FSS/RSS transition in highly overexpanded rocket nozzle flows
Emanuele Martelli

Shock Waves, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

EngineeringFlow SeparationShock WaveRocket Nozzle
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104