Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2003
The Augustan elegy formally continued the tradition of the Alexandrian elegy, with its predilection for erotic themes and mythological plots. However, it diametrically changed the proportions: for the Alexandrian poet, a "subjective" frame for the elegy was only a starting point for the extensive narrative describing the love adventures of the heroes of the myths, whereas Roman elegists formed the main theme of their works from the individual love experience in its full scale of emotional and sensual dimensions. The concentration on the subject of poems' inner experiences and the entire domination of poetry by a personal tone makes a basic characteristic of the Roman elegy as represented by Propertius, Tibullus and Ovid. The antinomy between the objective and subjective attitude defines the essence of the artistic breakthrough which occurred at the decline of the Roman Republic, which was caused by the influence of the neoteric poets' aestethics, with Catullus in the forefront. In terms of fairly clear, although not free from some simplifications classification suggested by K. Quinn, 1 we can speak of the appearance of a literary concept referred to as the "Poet as Himself', which stood beside the already known concepts such as: the "Poet as Storyteller" (in historical epic and in drama) and the "Poet as a Teacher" (in didactic epic).
2017
In this paper I analyse and compare the representations (or self-representations) of poets in the underworld in elegiac and lyric Roman poetry. I focus especially on five poems: Tibullus I.3; Propertius II. 34; Ovid, Amores II.6 (birds as poets) and III.9; Horace, Odes II.13. It is not my intention to give a detailed interpretation of the whole poems; my principal aim is to analyse how dead poets are pictured in two different genres, the elegiac and the lyric, which share certain features (for instance, we can have in some lyric poems the poetic persona of a lover, the amator, which characterizes erotic elegy discourse, and some similar topics, as the metaphor of love as illness, etc.). At the end of this paper, I will point to the images of dead poets that are (I think) the most representative of the difference between elegiac and lyric genres. In the footnotes I provide some bibliographical references on studies and commentaries about each of the poems I treat here.
Barbara K. Gold (ed.), A Companion to Roman Love Elegy (Malden MA, 2012)
Klio, 2014
The years of the early Principate, especially the rule of Augustus, are witness to the radical change, on the contrary to Republic, in the number of references of aeternitas especially in Roman poetry. Famous Augustan poets close to the idea of aeternitas are Virgil, Tibullus, Propertius, Horace and Ovid. Numerous references to the concept of aeternitas constituted the outcome of the contemporary mentality and specific world views towards the issue of the permanence and stability of the state; they resulted from social expectations as well as from ideological creations of the new power. The notion of aeternitas, which Augustan authors referred to, was deliberately set in the religious and political tradition of Rome. By means of this notion, poets extremely frequently conveyed the idea of the permanence and stability of the state as well as of the prevailing political system. Most often the concept was evoked in the context of the tradition of the foundation myths of Rome, especiall...
Arethusa 43.3: 439-60, 2010
Zissos/A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome, 2016
Brill's Encyclopaedia of the Neo-Latin World. Vol. 1: Macropaedia, ed. by J. Bloemendal, C. Fantazzi and P. Ford (Leiden and Boston), 387-398, 2014
This essay is concerned with all Neo-Latin poetry in the elegiac couplet. It is thus not confined to the modern sense of the (English) word ‘elegy’, which is usually employed only for poetry of mourning. Though this type of elegy is strongly related to the origins of the classical genre and constitutes an important category within Latin elegiac poetry, it is certainly not the only type. Epigrammatic poetry, however, will be excluded from this essay, though much of it is composed in the elegiac couplet. On the basis of a number of characteristics, conciseness and shortness being the most important, it is generally perceived as a genre of its own. This is not to suggest, though, that the distinction between elegiac and epigrammatic poetry would be an easy one, and it is important to note here that there are many influences from epigram in elegy and vice versa, and that many similar subjects were treated by both. This is true for antiquity, but even more so for the early modern period. Neo-Latin elegiac poetry is for a considerable part, based on classical, mostly Latin models. These models include the Latin love elegies by Tibullus, Propertius, and Ovid (including his Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto), and the elegiac poems of late antique poets such as Ausonius and Claudian. Because of the great variety of themes treated in elegiac poetry in antiquity and later ages, the variety in Neo-Latin elegiacs is likewise enormous. Moreover, the range of Neo-Latin elegiac poetry is much broader than earlier models might suggest. This range results substantially from the basic openness that the genre displayed in antiquity, which inspired many Neo-Latin poets to broaden the scope of the elegiac genre and also to incorporate themes not treated in classical elegiac poetry. In order to arrive at an understanding of this wide-ranging Neo-Latin elegiac practice, this essay will distinguish between various subgenres or ‘types’. It will first discuss a number of categories that display a close and recognizable relationship with specific classical elegiac model(s). Subsequently, it will discuss the ways in which the genre was further broadened to include several new themes and functions. This overview and discussion of examples will obviously be neither exhaustive nor representative of all Neo-Latin elegies that have been written. Nonetheless, it aims to give an impression of the most common Neo-Latin elegiac (sub)genres, explain the ways in which they developed from certain classical models, and present the new forms that were invented while accounting for their foundations.
in H. Marlow, K. Pollmann and H. Van Noorden (eds.) Eschatology in Antiquity, London: Routledge, 307-19., 2021
Apocalyptic scenarios feature at the start of Augustan poetry, signalling a break between the potential catastrophe of civil war and Augustus’ renewed Golden Age. This chapter surveys such openings, focussing on Horace’s Odes, Vergil's Georgics and Aeneid and especially Ovid's Metamorphoses, and argues that their incoherent eschatologies mirror the anxieties surrounding the future of this post-traumatic age.
Gaius Valerius Catullus’ polymetric and elegiac poems make up two thirds of a body of work which expresses the poetic and psychological imagination of the finest poetae novi to emerge from that school. His stylistically refined and genre-defying verse, which Cicero famously found distasteful to his own restrained and traditional tastes, yet belies a psychological tension between the old and the new. Simultaneously both eschewing and honouring the conventions of Roman values and literary propriety, Catullus’ oeuvre is metrically diverse, linguistically adventurous, and rich in allusion. His polymetric poems and his elegiac verse both speak of the conflicts within himself, and his attempts to redefine and re-purpose the role of poet in the society in which he lived.
Exemplaria classica: journal of classical philology, 2017
2014
This is the first book to study the impact of invective poetics associated with early Greek iambic poetry on Roman imperial authors and audiences. It demonstrates how authors as varied as Ovid and Gregory Nazianzen wove recognizable elements of the iambic tradition (e.g., meter, motifs, or poetic biographies) into other literary forms (e.g., elegy, oratorical prose, anthologies of fables), and it shows that the humorous, scurrilous, efficacious aggression of Archilochus continued to facilitate negotiations of power and social relations long after Horace's Epodes. The eclectic approach encompasses Greek and Latin, prose and poetry, and exploratory interludes appended to each chapter help to open four centuries of later classical literature to wider debates about the function, propriety, and value of the lowest and most debated poetic form from archaic Greece. Each chapter presents a unique variation on how each of these imperial authors became Archilochushowever briefly and to whatever end. tom hawkins is Associate Professor of Classics at Ohio State University. His work and teaching focus on iambic poetics and invective as well as animal studies and personhood.
Antichthon, 2023
Within the rhetorical frameworks of exhortation and illustrative exemplum, Horace's second and sixth Roman Odes offer compressed, contrasting images of a young person's education and transformation, presenting these as stories about a puer and a virgo, respectively, in a lyric mode that does not narrate. In the first of these stories (Carm. 3.2.1-12), Horace slyly usurps characters from Vergil's unfinished Aeneid, alluding to some of its distinctive narrative techniques, but also draws on the similes and plot structure of its Iliadic model. The second of Horace's stories (Carm. 3.6.21-32) plays off his first, as he converts the adulta virgo who figures in Carm. 3.2 into her antitype. This story has as its intertext an obscene Hellenistic epigram by Automedon. Horace makes both intertextual and metatextual use of his models, while his indirect references, through Homer, to Vergil's intended design for his emerging Aeneid may be considered under the new heading of extratextual.
Signal::Failure (squared) - The Agon of Romance and Triumph, 2015
Catalogue essay for the exhibition 'Signal::Failure (squared) - The Agon of Romance and Triumph'. Maverick Projects, Safehouses 1 and 2, London, December 2015.
Antichthon
Within the rhetorical frameworks of exhortation and illustrative exemplum, Horace's second and sixth Roman Odes offer compressed, contrasting images of a young person's education and transformation, presenting these as stories about a puer and a virgo, respectively, in a lyric mode that does not narrate. In the first of these stories (Carm. 3.2.1–12), Horace slyly usurps characters from Vergil's unfinished Aeneid, alluding to some of its distinctive narrative techniques, but also draws on the similes and plot structure of its Iliadic model. The second of Horace's stories (Carm. 3.6.21–32) plays off his first, as he converts the adulta virgo who figures in Carm. 3.2 into her antitype. This story has as its intertext an obscene Hellenistic epigram by Automedon. Horace makes both intertextual and metatextual use of his models, while his indirect references, through Homer, to Vergil's intended design for his emerging Aeneid may be considered under the new heading of ...
New approaches to the Age of Augustus on the bimillennium of his death I, 2020
Por más que pueda parecer una doble contradictio in terminis hablar de poesía helenística en el Siglo de Augusto y de valores metapoéticos en una obra escrita en prosa, el autor de este capítulo propone un análisis de los Ἐρωτικὰ Παθήματα de Partenio de Nicea (uno de los ejemplos más granados de obra-puente entre la poesía del período helenístico y la gran poesía latina de época augústea) desde unos presupuestos metapoéticos y esclarecedores del quehacer poético los siglos alejandrinos y su recepción en el mundo romano. Although it may seem a double contradictio in terminis to speak about Hellenistic Poetry in the Age of Augustus and about metapoetic values in a work written in prose, the author of this chapter proposes an analysis of the Ἐρωτικὰ Παθήματα of Parthenius of Nicaea (one of the more illuminating examples of a work bridging the poetry of the Hellenistic period and the great Latin poetry of the Augustan Age) from a metapoetic perspective that sheds light on the Alexandrian poetic practice and its reception in the Roman world.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.