Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Improving soil aquifer treatment efficiency using air injection into the subsurface

2022

https://doi.org/10.5194/HESS-2022-376

Abstract

Soil aquifer treatment (SAT) is an effective and sustainable technology for wastewater or stormwater treatment, storage and reuse. During SAT, the vadose zone acts as a pseudo reactor in which physical and biochemical processes are utilized to improve the infiltrated water quality. Dissolved oxygen (DO) is necessary for aerobic microbial oxidation of carbon and nitrogen species in the effluent. Therefore, to enhance aeration, SAT is generally operated in flooding and drying cycles. While long drying periods (DPs) lead to better oxidizing conditions and improve water quality, they reduce recharge volumes. As the population grows, the quantity of effluent directed to SAT sites increases and increasing recharge volumes become a concern and often a limiting factor for SAT usage. In this study, direct subsurface air injection SAT (Air-SAT) was tested as an alternative to long DPs operation. Six long column experiments were conducted, aiming to examine the effect of air injection on the soil's water content, oxidationreduction potential (ORP), DO concentrations, infiltrated amounts and ultimate outflow quality. In addition to basic parameters such as dissolved organic-C (DOC) and N species, the effluent quality analysis also included an examination of three emerging water contaminants -Ibuprofen, Carbamazepine and 1H-benzotriazole. Pulsed air injection experiments were conducted during continuous flooding at different operation modes (i.e., air pulse durations, frequencies and airflow rates). Our results show that the Air-SAT operation doubled the infiltration time (i.e., the infiltration was continuous with no offtime) and allowed up to 46% higher infiltration rate in some cases. As a result, the infiltrated volumes in the Air-SAT modes were 47-203% higher than the conventional flooding-drying operation (FDO). Longer air pulse duration (60 vs. 8 min) and higher airflow rate (~2 vs. ~1 SLPM) led to a higher infiltration rate, while a high pulse frequency (4.5 -1 h -1 ) led to a lower infiltration rate compared to low-frequency operation (24 -1 h -1 ). The air injection also allowed good recovery of the ORP and DO levels in the soil, especially in the high-frequency Air-SAT experiments, where steady aerobic conditions were maintained during most of the flooding. Consequently, the mean DOC,

References (53)

  1. Aharoni, A., Negev, I., Cohen, E., Bar, O., Shtrasler, L., Orgad, O., Gabay, R., and Shevach, Y.: Monitoring Shafdan effluents recharge and the third line project: 2019 Yearly Report, Mekorot -National water co., Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel, 2020. In Hebrew, a summary is written in English.
  2. Amy, G. and Drewes, J.: Soil aquifer treatment (SAT) as a natural and sustainable wastewater reclamation/reuse technology: Fate of wastewater effluent organic Matter (EfoM) and trace organic compounds, Environ. Monit. Assess., 129, 19-26, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9421-4, 2007.
  3. Barry, K. E., Vanderzalm, J. L., Miotlinski, K., and Dillon, P. J.: Assessing the impact of recycled water quality and clogging on infiltration rates at a pioneering Soil Aquifer Treatment (SAT) site in Alice Springs, Northern Territory (NT), Australia, Water (Switzerland), 9, 179, https://doi.org/10.3390/w9030179, 2017.
  4. Ben Moshe, S., Weisbrod, N., Barquero, F., Sallwey, J., Orgad, O., and Furman, A.: On the role of operational dynamics in biogeochemical efficiency of a soil aquifer treatment system, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 24, 417-426, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-417-2020, 2020.
  5. Ben Moshe, S., Weisbrod, N., and Furman, A.: Optimization of soil aquifer treatment (SAT) operation using a reactive transport model, Vadose Zone J., 20, e20095, https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20095, 2021.
  6. Ben-Noah, I., Nitsan, I., and Friedman, S. P.: Forced gas injection and water infiltration into sand -A two-phase flow barrel and column experiment, Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J., 85, 40-58, https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20138, 2021.
  7. Bouwer, H.: Ground Water Recharge with sewage effluent, Water Sci. Technol., 23, 2099-2108, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1991.0666, 1991.
  8. Bouwer, H.: Artificial recharge of groundwater: hydrogeology and engineering, Hydrogeol. J., 10, 121-142, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0182-4, 2002. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-376
  9. Preprint. Discussion started: 13 December 2022
  10. Brooks, J., Weisbrod, N., and Bar-Zeev, E.: Revisiting soil Aquifer treatment: Improving biodegradation and filtration efficiency using a highly porous material, Water (Switzerland)., 12, 3593, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123593, 2020.
  11. Dean, W. E.: Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition; comparison with other methods, J. Sediment. Res., 44, 242-248, https://doi.org/10.1306/74D729D2-2B21-11D7- 8648000102C1865D, 1974.
  12. Dror, I., Berkowitz, B., and Gorelick, S. M.: Effects of air injection on flow through porous media: Observations and analyses of laboratory-scale processes, Water. Resour. Res., 40, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002960, 2004.
  13. Filter, J., Jekel, M., and Ruhl, A. S.: Impacts of accumulated particulate organic matter on oxygen consumption and organic micro-pollutant elimination in bank filtration and soil aquifer treatment, Water (Switzerland), 9, https://doi.org/10.3390/w9050349, 2017.
  14. Gee, G. W. and Or, D.: 2.4 Particle-size analysis, in: Methods of soil analysis: Part 4 physical methods, vol. 5, Wiley Online Library, 255-293, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c12, 2002.
  15. van Genuchten, M. Th.: A Closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892-898, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x, 1980.
  16. Gharoon, N. and Pagilla, K. R.: Critical review of effluent dissolved organic nitrogen removal by soil/aquifer-based treatment systems, Chemosphere, 269, 129406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129406, 2021.
  17. Glorian, H., Börnick, H., Sandhu, C., and Grischek, T.: Water quality monitoring in northern India for an evaluation of the efficiency of bank filtration sites, Water (Switzerland), 10, 1804, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121804, 2018.
  18. Goren, O., Burg, A., Gavrieli, I., Negev, I., Guttman, J., Kraitzer, T., Kloppmann, W., and Lazar, B.: Biogeochemical processes in infiltration basins and their impact on the recharging effluent, the soil aquifer treatment (SAT) system of the Shafdan plant, Israel, Appl. Geochem., 48, 58-69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.06.017, 2014.
  19. Grinshpan, M., Furman, A., Dahlke, H. E., Raveh, E., and Weisbrod, N.: From managed aquifer recharge to soil aquifer treatment on agricultural soils: Concepts and challenges, Agr. Water Manage., 255, 106991, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106991, 2021.
  20. Grinshpan, M., Turkeltaub, T., Furman, A., Raveh, E., and Weisbrod, N.: On the use of orchards to support soil aquifer treatment systems, Agr. Water Manage., 260, 107315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107315, 2022.
  21. He, K., Asada, Y., Echigo, S., and Itoh, S.: Biodegradation of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the sequential combination of activated sludge treatment and soil aquifer treatment, Environ. Technol., 41, 378-388, https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1499810, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-376
  22. Preprint. Discussion started: 13 December 2022
  23. Icekson-Tal, N., Avraham, O., Sack, J., and Cikurel, H.: Water reuse in Israel -The Dan Region Project: evaluation of water quality and reliability of plant's operation, Water Sci. Tech.-W. Sup., 3, 231-237, https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2003.0067, 2003.
  24. Idelovitch, E. and Michail, M.: Soil-aquifer treatment: a new approach to an old method of wastewater reuse, J. Water Pollut. Con. F., 56, 936-943, https://www.jstor.org/stable/25042398, 1984.
  25. Idelovitch, E., Icekson-Tal, N., Avraham, O., and Michail, M.: The long-term performance of Soil Aquifer Treatment (SAT) for effluent reuse, Water Sci. Tech.-W. Sup., https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2003.0068, 2003.
  26. Jetten, M. S. M.: The microbial nitrogen cycle, Environ. Microbiol., 10, 2903-2909, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462- 2920.2008.01786.x, 2008.
  27. Lappin-Scott, H. M. and Bass, C.: Biofilm formation: attachment, growth, and detachment of microbes from surfaces, Am. J. Infect. Control, 29, 250-251, https://doi.org/10.1067/mic.2001.115674, 2001.
  28. Martínez-Hernández, V., Meffe, R., Herrera López, S., and de Bustamante, I.: The role of sorption and biodegradation in the removal of acetaminophen, carbamazepine, caffeine, naproxen and sulfamethoxazole during soil contact: A kinetics study, Sci. Total Environ., 559, 232-241, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.131, 2016.
  29. Mienis, O. and Arye, G.: Long-term nitrogen behavior under treated wastewater infiltration basins in a soil-aquifer treatment (SAT) system, Water Res., 134, 192-199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.069, 2018.
  30. Mizrahi, G., Furman, A., and Weisbrod, N.: Infiltration under confined air conditions: Impact of Inclined Soil Surface, Vadose Zone J., 15, vzj2016.04.0034, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.04.0034, 2016.
  31. Montwedi, M., Munyaradzi, M., Pinoy, L., Dutta, A., Ikumi, D. S., Motoasca, E., and van der Bruggen, B.: Resource recovery from and management of wastewater in rural South Africa: Possibilities and practices, J. Water Process Eng., 40, 101978, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101978, 2021.
  32. Naz, I., Batool, S. A. U., Ali, N., Khatoon, N., Atiq, N., Hameed, A., and Ahmed, S.: Monitoring of growth and physiological activities of biofilm during succession on polystyrene from activated sludge under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, Environ. Monit. Assess., 185, 6881-6892, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3072-z, 2013.
  33. Negev, I., Shechter, T., Shtrasler, L., Rozenbach, H., and Livne, A.: The effect of soil tillage equipment on the recharge capacity of infiltration ponds, Water (Switzerland), 12, 541, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020541, 2020.
  34. Onesios, K. M. and Bouwer, E. J.: Biological removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products during laboratory soil aquifer treatment simulation with different primary substrate concentrations, Water Res., 46, 2365-2375, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.001, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-376
  35. Preprint. Discussion started: 13 December 2022
  36. Pavelic, P., Dillon, P. J., Mucha, M., Nakai, T., Barry, K. E., and Bestland, E.: Laboratory assessment of factors affecting soil clogging of soil aquifer treatment systems, Water Res., 45, 3153-3163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.03.027, 2011.
  37. Quanrud, D. M., Arnold, R. G., Wilson, L. G., Gordon, H. J., Graham, D. W., and Amy, G. L.: Fate of Organics during Column Studies of Soil Aquifer Treatment, J. Environ. Eng., 122, 314-321, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1996)122:4(314), 1996.
  38. Qureshi, A. S.: Challenges and prospects of using treated wastewater to manage water scarcity crises in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, Water (Switzerland), 12, 1971, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071971, 2020.
  39. Van Raaphorst, W. and Malschaert, J. F. P.: Ammonium adsorption in superficial North Sea sediments, Cont. Shelf. Res., 16, 1415-1435, https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(95)00081-X, 1996.
  40. Rauch, T. and Drewes, J. E.: Quantifying Biological Organic Carbon Removal in Groundwater Recharge Systems, J. of Environ. Eng., 131, 909-923, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2005)131:6(909), 2005.
  41. Rodríguez-Escales, P., Fernàndez-Garcia, D., Drechsel, J., Folch, A., and Sanchez-Vila, X.: Improving degradation of emerging organic compounds by applying chaotic advection in Managed Aquifer Recharge in randomly heterogeneous porous media, Water. Resour. Res., 53, 4376-4392, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020333, 2017.
  42. Ruan, A., He, R., Xu, S., and Lin, T.: Effect of dissolved oxygen on nitrogen purification of microbial ecosystem in sediments, J. Environ. Sci. Heal. A, 44, 397-405, https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520802659778, 2009.
  43. Sallwey, J., Jurado, A., Barquero, F., and Fahl, J.: Enhanced removal of contaminants of emerging concern through hydraulic adjustments in soil aquifer treatment, Water (Switzerland), 12, 2627, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092627, 2020.
  44. Sharma, S. K. and Kennedy, M. D.: Soil aquifer treatment for wastewater treatment and reuse, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 119, 671-677, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.013, 2017.
  45. Sopilniak, A., Elkayam, R., Rossin, A. V., and Lev, O.: Emerging organic pollutants in the vadose zone of a soil aquifer treatment system: Pore water extraction using positive displacement, Chemosphere, 190, 383-392, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.010, 2018.
  46. Steduto, P., Faures, J. M., Hoogeveen J, Winpenny J, and Burke J: Coping with water scarcity: an action framework for agriculture and food security, FAO water reports, 9789251073049, 2012.
  47. Stefanakis, A., Akratos C. S., and Tsihrintzis V. A.: Vertical flow constructed wetlands: eco-engineering systems for wastewater and sludge treatment, first edition, Elsevier Science, Newnes, 9780124046870, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-376 Preprint. Discussion started: 13 December 2022
  48. Thuy, V. K., He, K., Echigo, S., Asada, Y., and Itoh, S.: Impact of biological clogging and pretreatments on the operation of soil aquifer treatments for wastewater reclamation, Water Cycle, 3, 35-43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watcyc.2022.03.001, 2022. Turkeltaub, T., Furman, A., Mannheim, R., and Weisbrod, N.: Continuous monitoring of a soil aquifer treatment system's physico-chemical conditions to optimize operational performance, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 26, 1565-1578, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1565-2022, 2022.
  49. Usman, M., Waseem, M., Mani, N., and Andiego, G.: Optimization of Soil Aquifer Treatment by Chemical Oxidation with Hydrogen Peroxide Addition, Pollution, 4, 369-379, https://doi.org/10.15480/882.3610, 2018.
  50. Willis, R. B., Montgomery, M. E., and Allen, P. R.: Improved method for manual, colorimetric determination of total kjeldahl nitrogen using salicylate, J. Agr. Food Chem., 44, 1804-1807, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf950522b, 1996.
  51. Wilson, L. G., Amy, G. L., Gerba, C. P., Gordon, H., Johnson, B., and Miller, J.: Water quality changes during soil aquifer treatment of tertiary effluent, Water Environ. Res., 67, 371-376, https://doi.org/10.2175/106143095X131600, 1995.
  52. Wünsch, R., Plattner, J., Cayon, D., Eugster, F., Gebhardt, J., Wülser, R., von Gunten, U., and Wintgens, T.: Surface water treatment by UV/H2O2 with subsequent soil aquifer treatment: Impact on micropollutants, dissolved organic matter and biological activity, Environ Sci. Water Res. Technol., 5, 1709-1722, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ew00547a, 2019.
  53. Zang, Y. and Li, M.: Numerical assessment of compressed air injection for mitigating seawater intrusion in a coastal unconfined aquifer, J Hydrol., 595, 125964, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.125964, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-376 Preprint. Discussion started: 13 December 2022