Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1967, Psychosomatic Medicine
Responses to questionnaire interviews of 73 men who had undergone vasectomies are discussed, and summary tables presented. The questions cover personal characteristics, the operation itself, motivational factors, and outcome of the operation. Analysis of the outcome includes pre-and postoperative physical health; sexual behavior; psychosocial adjustment factors-including marital, job, and community relationships and concern over children; satisfaction with the operation; and social behavior with regard to the operation. On most of these questions the respondent was also asked to evaluate his wife's condition, behavior, or attitude. Medical aspects of the vasectomy and postoperative sperm tests are also discussed. V-ZVER THE PAST few years, the performance of vasectomy has increased in importance as a means of fertility control in the United States and elsewhere. Information obtained in a nationwide survey 1 indicates that about 45,000 such operations are performed annually in the United States. The basic assumption of the present study is that, aside from eliminating the ability to deliver sperm, vasectomy can yield consequences that constitute the psychosocial sequelae of having decided to sterilize oneself. We sought to focus on several questions: 1. How many men and their wives
North American Journal of Medical Sciences, 2012
Background: Irregular growth of population is considered as a serious threat to the international community. It is a major obstacle for socioeconomic development. One of the methods to control the population is by providing effective methods of contraception. Vasectomy, as a simple and effective contraceptive method, has been approved by the World Health Organization (WHO). It is very important to involve men in the control of population and the promotion of reproductive health. Aims: This study was conducted with the aim of describing the experiences of the men who underwent vasectomy. Materials and Methods: This qualitative study was performed by using a phenomenological research design. The sample consisted of 14 vasectomized men selected through purposive sampling method. In-depth and open interviews with participants were conducted to collect the data. Results: The results were transcribed and recorded in comprehensive field notes. Colaizzi's method was used to analyze the data. Four themes emerged from the obtained results of the present study, which described the structure of the experiences of men as follows: Opinions about vasectomy, own perceptions about vasectomy, experiences with the procedure, and recommendation of vasectomy to others. Conclusion: Vasectomy can influence achievement of family planning goals and participation of men in this regard. The results of this study can help the planners and health-care providers for appropriate interventions, and training and counseling programmers to increase the acceptability and uptake of vasectomy in the society.
2000
This paper contains data from a qualitative study from 218 in-depth interviews with men and women and their partners who decided to have a vasectomy in six countries: Bangladesh, Kenya, Mexico, Rwanda, Sri Lanka and the USA. It examined the key factors that led men to choose vasectomy and what role their partners played in this decision. The reasons for
Fertility and Sterility, 2013
Objective: To describe the longitudinal demographics and family planning attitudes of vasectomized men with the use of the National Survey for Family Growth (NSFG). Design: Retrospective cohort analysis of the NSFG with the use of national projections and multivariable regressions. Setting: In-home survey. Patient(s): The NSFG sampled 10,403 men aged 15-45 years from 2006 to 2010 regarding family planning attitudes. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Vasectomy and desire for children. Result(s): There were 3,646,339 (6.6%) vasectomized men aged 18-45 years in the U.S. On multivariable regression the following factors increased the odds of having a vasectomy: currently married (odds ratio [OR] 7.814), previously married (OR 5.865), and increased age (OR 1.122) and income (OR 1.003). The odds of having a vasectomy increased with number of children. The following factors decreased the odds of having a vasectomy: immigrant status (OR 0.186), African American (OR 0.226), Hispanic (OR 0.543), Catholic (OR 0.549), and other non-Protestant religion (OR 0.109). Surprisingly, an estimated 714,682 (19.6%) vasectomized men in the U.S. desire future children. Men practicing a religion (OR 8.575-15.843) were more likely than atheists to desire children after vasectomy. 71,886 (2.0%) vasectomized men reported having a vasectomy reversal. Conclusion(s): This study highlights the importance of preoperative counseling for permanency of vasectomy and reveals an opportunity to counsel couples about vasectomy versus tubal ligation. (Fertil Steril Ò 2013;99:1880-5. Ó2013 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2004
RESULTS: Low-income, minority and less educated men were underrepresented among vasectomy recipients. The majority of men were married or cohabiting (91%), non-Hispanic and white (87%), and educated beyond high school (81%). Only 7% of men had annual household incomes of less than $25,000, and fewer than 1% paid for the procedure using public funding; 81% of respondents paid through private insurance or a health maintenance organization. Half of men reported choosing vasectomy over a reversible method because it is the most secure means of preventing pregnancy, and 62% chose vasectomy over tubal ligation because the procedure is simpler and safer. Doctors and nurses were the most important sources of information about vasectomy (cited by 31% of respondents), followed by wives or partners (25%) and friends (23%).
Vasectomy is one of the Long-term Contraceptive Method. The low participation of men in family planning is influenced by many factors, such as a stigma in society regarding masculinity, scrotal pain after vasectomy, and impaired sexual function after vasectomy. Currently, research has not identified the quality of life of vasectomy acceptors. This study aimed to compare the physical health, mental health and sexual function between vasectomy acceptors with non vasectomy. We used cross-sectional study to compare the differences in physical health, mental health and sexual function among vasectomy acceptors compared to non vasectomy. We collected the information from 59 subjects who met the inclusion criteria for each group. Sampling is done by simple random sampling technique. The research was conducted in the Kiarapedes District, Purwakarta in October 2012 using SF-36 and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ). The data were further analyzed using Mann-Whitney test and Spearman test. The data showed that for physical health dimension for vasectomy acceptor the median score was 77 (16-90), and median score of 80 (37-86) among non vasectomy. There was no significant difference (p=0.324) about physical health among vasectomy acceptor and non vasectomy. We found for mental health dimension for vasectomy acceptor the median score was 77 (36-93) and median score of 73 (18-93) among non vasectomy. We found no significant difference (p=0.206) about mental health among vasectomy acceptor and non vasectomy. Meanwhile, the result of sexual function showed median score of 88(47-99) among vasectomy acceptor and median score of 78 (20-100) for non vasectomy. We revealed that there is a significant difference (p=0.013) on sexual function among vasectomy acceptor compared to non vasectomy. We concluded that there is significant difference on sexual function. However, there are no significant differences on physical health and mental health status.
National Journal of Community Medicine, 2017
Background: Out of all the family planning methods available vasectomy is the least preferred method. Objectives: The objective of the study was to study various factors affecting vasectomy. Methods: Record based study with a qualitative component Records of 50% beneficiaries (136) out of total 260 vasectomy operation done in 2014-15 in Ahmedabad city were studied and 10% were interviewed . Data was analyzed using Epi info software. Result: Mean age of the vasectomy beneficiaries was 37.9 years ( SD 6.0) .Mean number of children with the couple were 2.44.Mean age of the last living child was 7.7 years (SD 5.5) .About more than half of the beneficiaries had two children. The last living child was male in 56% and 91% (124) couple had at least one male child in the family. Education of the husband was statistically significantly related to the age of deciding vasectomy and total number of children. Personal interview with beneficiaries revealed that in 12 out of 13 beneficiaries it was a joint decision of the couple .Wife and health worker were the main motivators. They were not told about precautions to be followed till sterilization is achieved. Conclusion: Vasectomy is a less preferred method because of various myths associated with it.
2018
Background: Vasectomy is a simple effective and safe surgical procedure for permanent male fertility control. However, high acceptance rates of vasectomy have been reported in developed countries, while low acceptance rates have been reported in developing countries like Nigeria. Objective: This study was designed to investigate the knowledge and perception of vasectomy among male staffs of Novena University Ogume, Delta State Nigeria. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 151 purposively selected male staffs of Novena University, Ogume. A semi-structured questionnaire was self-administered to obtain information on respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics, level of knowledge of vasectomy, perception and attitude towards vasectomy. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square test were used to analyse the data with level of significance set at 0.05. Results: The results show that the mean age of the respondents was 36.99±11.08 years. The overall level of knowledge show tha...
Urology, 1998
Objectives. Currently, no surveillance system collects data on the numbers and characteristics of vasectomies performed annually in the United States. This study provides nationwide data on the numbers of vasectomies and the use of no-scalpel vasectomy, various occlusion methods, fascial interposition, and protocols for analyzing semen after vasectomy. Methods. A retrospective mail survey (with telephone follow-up) was conducted of 1800 urology, family practice, and general surgery practices drawn from the American Medical Association's Physician Master File and stratified by specialty and census region. Mail survey and telephone follow-up yielded an 88% response rate. Results. In 1995, approximately 494,000 vasectomies are estimated to have been performed by 15,800 physicians in the United States. Urologists performed 76% of all vasectomies, and nearly all (93%) urology practices performed vasectomies in 1995. Nearly one third (29%) of vasectomies in 1995 were no-scalpel vasectomies, and 37% of physicians performing no-scalpel vasectomies taught themselves the procedure. The most common occlusion method in 1995 (used for 38% of all vasectomies) was concurrent use of ligation and cautery. In 1995, slightly less than half (48%) of all physicians surveyed interposed the fascial sheath over one end of the vas when performing a vasectomy. Protocols for ensuring azoospermia varied: 56% of physicians required one postvasectomy semen specimen; 39% required two, and 5%, three or more.
Abstract Objective: To determine the main reasons for vasectomies in clients presenting to tertiary care government reproductive health centers. Study design: Descriptive. Place and duration of study: Jinnah Post Medical Graduate Reproductive Health Services Center (RHS), population Welfare Department, government of Sindh, Karachi from January 2007 to November 2008. Methodology: The study includes 208 clients undergoing vasectomy selected through consecutive sampling. The inclusion criteria were all clients of any age undergoing vasectomy, who were married and had three or more children. All clients who were unmarried, or had fewer than three children, or provided incomplete information were excluded. The main variables of the study were the educational level, occupation, duration of marriage, and reasons for vasectomy. Results: The mean age of the clients was 37.72 (±5.10) years. The mean duration of marriage was 14.99 (±4.60) years. About 90 (43.3%) clients were illiterate, 18 (8.7%) primary grade school pass, 60 (28.8%) middle grade school pass, 26 (12.5%) matric (high school) pass, 10 (4.8%) inter (college) pass and 4 (1.9%) were (university) graduates. About 124 (59.6%) clients were laborers. The main reason for the vasectomies was compensation in 124 (59.6%) clients followed by poverty 80 (38.5%) and failure of other means of contraception 4 (1.9%). Conclusion: Financial compensation provided by the government is the major factor for vasectomies in clients. This government strategy seems not to be cost effective in long term. Furthermore it rises the question of how ethical is it to influence patients to have vasectomies for compensation rather than focusing their mind towards vasectomy as means of contraception and family planning. Key words: Vasectomies, Compensation, poverty and education
Family planning has a controlling effect on the rate of population growth throughout the world in addition to preventing pregnancyrelated health risks in women, reducing infant mortality, helping to prevent children's congenital diseases, and improving quality of life of the family. Despite, men's participation in family planning programs tends to promote life standards and help national development, but men do not very willing accept vasectomy. This study aimed to investigate the nursing personnel perspectives toward vasectomy barriers.
Contraception, 2011
Male sterilization (vasectomy) is the most effective form and only long-acting form of contraception available to men in the United States. Compared to female sterilization, it is more efficacious, more cost-effective, and has lower rates of complications. Despite these advantages, in the United States, vasectomy is utilized at less than half the rate of female sterilization. In addition, vasectomy is least utilized among black and Latino populations, groups with the highest rates of female sterilization. This review provides an overview of vasectomy use and techniques, and explores reasons for the disparity in vasectomy utilization in the United States.
Journal of Biosocial Science, 1978
SummaryThe results are presented of a survey of male subjects attending the Kingston Contraceptive Clinic for vasectomy. The men living in the Kingston Area (KA) were compared with those living in the Out of Kingston Area (OKA) for economic and other differences.For both groups, the average age of the subjects at the time of interview was 36 years and the average age of their partners was 33 years. The couples in both groups had an average of 2·4 living children. The OKA sample had been married on average 3 years longer than the KA sample.Economic differences were minimal, both groups having an average weekly income £22 in excess of the estimated average national wage. Educationally the groups were broadly similar, the OKA sample having a higher proportion of graduate subjects. The social class distribution of both samples was significantly different from that of the South-East of England, and showed that usage of vasectomy was predominantly by Social Classes II, IIIN and IIIM. This...
Although the need for family planning remains widespread and its health and economic rationales remain valid, family planning has been neglected in the face of competing health and development priorities. Given the need for "repositioning family planning" (i.e., for raising the priority of and resources for family planning), vasectomy services in particular need more attention and support. Vasectomy, the only highly effective male method of contraception, is safe, simple to perform, and economical-yet in most countries it is the family planning method that is the least known, understood, or used. 11 We have learned many lessons about how to program effectively for vasectomy, but a great many barriers to vasectomy's widespread use remain, at multiple levels-client, community, provider, facility, program and policy. A better understanding of what causes these barriers and how they can be removed, and of how to program effectively for vasectomy services, coupled with sustained commitment of attention and resources, can result in greater use of vasectomy. Increased use of vasectomy can help individuals and couples meet their reproductive health intentions and can help countries better serve their citizens while meeting development goals. In every region of the world and in nearly all social and cultural settings, men will use vasectomy services, provided these are appropriately offered. Increases in vasectomy use will likely be quite modest initially; in time, however, vasectomy in developing countries can reach levels seen in many developed countries. Sustained attention to and investments in vasectomy are warranted on both programmatic and equity grounds. * Throughout this paper, "vasectomy" refers to no-scalpel vasectomy (NSV), an innovative vasectomy technique developed in China in the 1970s and introduced and diffused in the 1980s in developing countries by EngenderHealth and other cooperating agencies. NSV has been proven to have significantly fewer side effects such as bleeding, pain, and infection.
American Journal of Public Health, 1984
A telephone survey of 1,172 Hamilton County, Ohio residents indicated that for ever-married people, 25.1 per cent of those aged 18-45 and 33.8 per cent of those 30-45 had been sterilized. Blacks and Whites had comparable levels of sterilization but, among Blacks, female sterilization was over eight times as common as vasectomy, while for Whites, the ratio was 1.2. Catholics had only one-half the sterilization rate of Protestants. Race, sex, income, and education were all related to knowledge and attitudes toward vasectomy. The need for more information was a major reason cited for not having a vasectomy. (Am J Public Health 1984; 74:79-82.) *Questions for this study were asked in a cost-shared survey conducted by the Behavioral Sciences Laboratory of the University of Cincinnati. They were purchased by Vasectomy Services Inc.. a non-profit vasectomy facility in Cincinnati that provides education, counseling, and medical services.
The Journal of Urology, 2006
We estimated the number of vasectomies performed in the United States in 2002 and gathered information on the vasectomy procedures and protocols used. It follows similar studies done in 1991 and 1995. Materials and Methods: A retrospective mail survey with telephone followup was performed in 2,300 urologists, family physicians and general surgeons randomly sampled from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Results: The response rate was 73.8%. An estimated 526,501 vasectomies were performed in 2002 for a rate of 10.2/1,000 men 25 to 49 years old. Overall 37.8% of physicians reported currently using no scalpel vasectomy and almost half of the vasectomies performed in 2002 were no scalpel vasectomies. Methods of vas occlusion varied in and among specialties with a combination of ligation and cautery being most common (41.0% of cases). Of the physicians 45.6% reported routinely performing fascial interposition, 94.4% reported removing a vas segment, 23.3% reported routinely folding back 1 or 2 ends of the vas and 7.5% reported using open-ended vasectomy. Followup protocols varied widely. Of respondents 53.5% reported charging $401 to $600 for vasectomy in 2002. Conclusions: Although the estimated number of vasectomies performed in the United States during 2002 represents an increase from 1991 and 1995, incidence rates remained unchanged at approximately 10/1,000 men 25 to 49 years old. The percent of vasectomies performed using no scalpel vasectomy as well as the number of physicians who reported that they use no scalpel vasectomy increased substantially since 1995. Wide variation in surgical techniques and followup protocols were found.
2021
BackgroundVasectomy is an effective contraceptive method that has been approved worldwide and proven to be an effective method of contraception among males in the perspective of controlling a population. Although safer, simpler, less expensive and equally as effective as female sterilization, throughout the world, it is one of the least used and least known methods of contraception. It is perceived to be a form of castration, which can make men weak and incapable, thereby unable to satisfy their wives sexually, leading to marital conflicts. The study aimed at determining perceptions and experiences regarding vasectomy among vasectomized men at Larterbiokorshie. MethodsThis study adopted a qualitative method utilizing Phenomenological research design. The sample consisted of 18 vasectomized men selected through purposive sampling method. Face-face interviews were conducted with participants using a semi-structured interview guide. ResultsThe study discovered that the vasectomized men...
The journal of …, 2010
INTRODUCTION: It is not known whether sexual problems are currently more prevalent among men who have had a vasectomy compared with those who have not had a vasectomy.AIM: To investigate whether vasectomized men are more likely to report experiencing a range of sexual problems than nonvasectomized men and to assess their overall sexual and relationship satisfaction.METHODS: A population-based survey of 3,390 Australian men's sexual experiences was conducted using computer-assisted telephone interviewing.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of vasectomized and nonvasectomized men who: (i) reported a sexual problem for at least 1 month during the last 12 months; and (ii) rated their sexual and relationship satisfaction as either extremely satisfying or not extremely satisfying.RESULTS: Vasectomy was reported by 25.1% of men, almost 70% of whom were aged 40-59 years. Vasectomized men were more likely to be married, live in regional areas, and speak English at home. Having a vasectomy was not associated with any specific sexual problem, such as lacking interest in sex or taking too long to reach orgasm. Vasectomized men (10.8%) were slightly more likely than nonvasectomized men (8.2%) to report problems maintaining an erection, but this difference disappeared when age and other socio-demographic variations were taken into account. Although vasectomized men (33.7%) were just as likely as nonvasectomized men (33.0%) to be extremely satisfied sexually, they were significantly more likely to be extremely satisfied with their relationship overall (48.3% vs. 42.9%).CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that sexual problems are no more prevalent among vasectomized men than they are among nonvasectomized men.
Medicine and health, Rhode Island, 2010
Texila International Journal of Public Health ISSN: 2520-3134, 2022
Vasectomy is a safe and effective permanent male contraceptive, although its acceptance remains low in low-income countries. A cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria, between 1st July and 31st August 2020. Participants were 247 consenting male health care workers recruited using systematic sampling based on their profession. Data collection was through a self-administered questionnaire, and analysis was performed using IBM-SSPS Version 23.0; p-value<0.05 was significant. The modal age group was 31-39 years (61.1%), 96.8% had tertiary education, 63.2% were Doctors, 21.5% were Laboratory Scientists, 12.1% Pharmacists, 1.6% Nurses, and 1.6% Physiotherapists; 68.0% had two or more children. Awareness about vasectomy was 93.5%, the commonest source of information was the health facility (55.3%), 76.5% supports the role of men in family planning while 84.0% were willing to share family planning responsibility with their partners 16.6% intend to undergo vasectomy on completion of their family size. The identified hindrances to the uptake of vasectomy were fear that it may lead to sexual dysfunction (87.0%), fear of other side effects (70.3%), irreversibility of the procedure (37.0%), cultural factors (25.0%), and concerns about possible infidelity (20.9%). Knowledge about vasectomy was negatively associated with its uptake (p<0.001). This study reports aversion to vasectomy among male health workers despite adequate awareness and Knowledge due to concerns about possible side effects, including the irreversibility of the procedure. Therefore, while advocacy for vasectomy continues, researchers should expedite actions to make reversible male contraceptives readily available.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.