Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2017
https://doi.org/10.3386/W23480…
63 pages
1 file
A consensus has recently emerged that variables beyond the level, slope, and curvature of the yield curve can help predict bond returns. This paper shows that the statistical tests underlying this evidence are subject to serious small-sample distortions. We propose more robust tests, including a novel bootstrap procedure specifically designed to test the spanning hypothesis. We revisit the analysis in six published studies and find that the evidence against the spanning hypothesis is much weaker than it originally appeared. Our results pose a serious challenge to the prevailing consensus.
The Journal of Investment Strategies, 2015
The present study assesses the relative performance of yield curve strategies involving bullet and barbell portfolios due to changes in the shape of the yield curve via shocks to the Dow Jones index. We employ three different yield curve models and bootstrap the bond portfolio performance using a block bootstrap approach to compute the 66 percent confidence intervals. We allow for co-movement among the yield curve factors. The study finds that a new parametrization we propose yields tighter confidence intervals than the usual approaches. In addition, we show that the shape of the confidence curves with respect to changes in terms to maturity, coupon rates, and market changes depends on the choice of the yield curve parametrization. This finding yields several important implications for bond portfolio strategies.
The average return on long-term bonds exceeds the return on short-term bills by a large amount over short investment horizons. A riding-the-yield-curve investment strategy takes advantage of the higher returns on longer term bonds. This strategy involves the purchase of bonds with maturities longer than the investment horizon and the sale of these bonds, before they mature, at the end of the investment horizon. Most of the literature that evaluates this strategy compares only ex post average returns or Sharpe ratios. In this paper, we use spanning tests to provide formal statistical evidence on the benefits of investing in long bonds when the investment horizon is short. The results for both the United States and Canada indicate that an investor with a short horizon is better off investing in short-term debt instruments than long-term bonds.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2008
We use a no-arbitrage essentially affine three-factor model to estimate term premia in US and German ten-year government bond yields. In line with the existing literature, we find that estimated premia have followed a downward trend since the 1980s: from 4.9 per cent in 1981 to 0.7 per cent in 2006 for the US bond and from 3.3 to 0.5 per cent for the German one. Subsequently, using an Error Correction Model (ECM) we prove that the decline is explained by a decrease in global output variability and an increase in the power of ten-year government bonds to diversify the investors' portfolios. In addition, the ECM also forecasts both the US and the German term premia converging to around one percentage point over a five year horizon. Long-term return expectations for ten-year government bonds will have to incorporate bond risk premia that-while in line with average excess returns during the twentieth century-are significantly lower than average excess returns over the last two decades.
2019
I study the sources of risk premia associated with the level bond portfolio by utilizing an international panel of zero-coupon bond data. I replicate a portion of ‘Yield Curve Premia’ by Brooks et al. who utilize principal component analysis to represent the moments of the yield curve and assess the efficacy of asset pricing factors commonly used in equities in explaining variation in bond returns.. I extend the work done in Yield Curve Premia by employing the partial least squares regression procedure in place of principal component analysis. I find that the level, slope, and curvature result is incredibly robust, not only across countries but also across dimensionality reduction methods. To assess the out-of-sample forecasting power of the partial least squares factors, I construct a trading rule using a predictive regression model and find varying return premia across countries in the panel. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
The predictability of security returns has received considerable attention in the finance literature. Notwithstanding, the predictability of bond returns, in particular outside the US, has been far less explored. In this paper we analyse the ability of several predetermined information variables in predicting bond returns in the European market.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012
I demonstrate that much of the time series variation in the credit spread on high yield bonds is attributable to changes in the "credit risk premium" rather than changes in expected default losses. The credit risk premium is the expected excess return investors earn from bearing default risk on high yield bonds. I find that the credit risk premium on high yield bonds averages about 2.4 percent per year, accounts for 43 percent of high yield credit spreads, on average, and predicts excess returns on high yield bonds. I also find that the excess returns on lower rated credits (B and CCC, relative to BB) are more sensitive to variation in the credit risk premium. The credit risk premium increases with the conditional volatility of default losses and decreases with aggregate consumption growth. The evidence suggests that conventional measures of economic risk are able to explain the sizeable increase in credit spreads in the fall of 2008.
We examine whether the predictability and business-cycle dependence of excess returns in US Treasuries can be more naturally explained in terms of state-dependent risk premia or a specific cognitive bias (repre-sentativeness). We show that the extremely parsimonious cognitive-bias model in Shleifer and Gennaioli (2018) accounts very well for a large number of stylized facts about the predictability of excess returns, and their business-cycle dependence. We also test the risk-premium explanation by looking at the correlation between the payoff of the carry strategy and (several proxies for) consumption. When we do so we find that this correlation either has no explanatory power for returns, or has the wrong sign. We conclude that undue extrapolation in the future of recent information provides a parsimonious, simple and arguably more compelling account of excess returns than a risk-premium explanation.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
Note: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the European Central Bank (ECB). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB.
1991
This note presents empirical evidence indicating that the time-varying risk premia in municipal bond yields can in part be explained by the ARCH-M procedure. The ARCH-M model was recently developed by Engle, Lilien, and Robins to analyze the risk premia in the term structure of interest rates. We have found that for 10and 20-year municipal bonds of three different risk classes, the risk premia have been significantly affected by recent past squared "surprises" in the excess holding yield. The pattern appears in data over the sample period 1952:i-1985:vi.
2008
Abstract The cross-section of returns of stock portfolios sorted along the book-to-market dimension can be understood with a one-factor model. The factor is the nominal bond risk premium, best measured as the Cochrane-Piazzesi (2005, CP) factor. This paper ties the pricing of stocks in the cross-section to the pricing of bonds of various maturities, two literatures that have been developed largely in isolation. A parsimonious stochastic discount factor model can price both the cross-section of stock and bond returns.
2005
We use information contained in yield spreads to recover investors' ex ante required rates of return on corporate securities, and then use these ex ante returns to study the pricing of risky assets. Differently from the standard approach, our asset pricing tests do not rely on the use of ex post average equity returns as proxies for expected equity returns. We Þnd that: (i) the market beta plays a signiÞcant role in the cross-section of expected equity returns, and its role persists even after size and book-to-market factors are accounted for; (ii) the risk premia associated with size and book-to-market are positive, signiÞcant, and countercyclical; and (iii) there is little evidence on positive momentum proÞts. We also Þnd that systematic risk, as captured by common equity factors, is the main driver of the cross-sectional variation in bond yield spreads.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017
This paper provides new evidence on bond risk premia by conditioning the classic Campbell-Shiller regressions on the business cycle. In expansions, we …nd mostly positive intercepts and negative regression slopes, but the results are completely reversed in recessions with negative intercepts and positive regression slopes. We reproduce these coe¢ cients in a term structure model with business cycle dependent loadings in the market price of risk. This model also predicts excess returns in the right direction during expansions and recessions, whereas the Gaussian a¢ ne term structure model predicts excess returns for medium-and long-term bonds with the wrong sign during recessions.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017
We predict bond betas conditioning on various macro-…nance variables. We explore di¤erences across long-term government bonds, investment grade corporate bonds, and high yield corporate bonds. We conduct out-of-sample forecasting using the new approach of combining explanatory variables through complete subset regressions (CSR). We consider the robustness of CSR forecasts across the 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month forecasting horizon. The CSR method performs well in predicting bond betas.
Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 2019
The return forecasting factor is a linear combination of forward rates that seems to predict 1-year excess bond returns of bond of all maturities better than traditional measures obtained from the yield curve. If this single factor actually captures all the relevant fluctuations in bond risk premia, then it should also summarize all the economically relevant variations in excess returns considering different holding periods. We find that it does not. We conclude that including the return forecasting factor as the main driver of risk premia in a term structure model, as has been suggested, is not supported by the data.
Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft
We study yield spreads between government bonds in the European Monetary Union. This segment of the global fixed income market is of particular importance for insurance companies in Europe. Our empirical research strategy is inspired by Gunay (2020) who has analyzed the relationship between credit and liquidity risk in the United States using Granger causality tests. More specifically, we employ the procedure developed by Toda and Yamamoto (1995) to test for Granger causality among yield spreads in five different member countries of the European Monetary Union (namely Austria, Belgium, France, Italy and Ireland) relative to Germany. We examine interest rate data from bonds with three different maturities (5, 10 and 30 years). Given the importance of long-term bonds as asset class for European life insurers and pension funds, the empirical results from the often ignored market for government bonds with a maturity of 30 years should be of interest. With regard to long-term sovereign d...
2009
This paper uses the factor augmented regression framework to analyze the relation between bond excess returns and the macro economy. Using a panel of 131 monthly macroeconomic time series for the sample 1964:1-2007:12, we estimate 8 static factors by the method of asymptotic principal components. We also use Gibb sampling to estimate dynamic factors from the 131 series reorganized into 8 blocks. Regardless of how the factors are estimated, macroeconomic factors are found to have statistically significant predictive power for excess bond returns. We show how a bias correction to the parameter estimates of factor augmented regressions can be obtained. This bias is numerically trivial in our application. The predictive power of real activity for excess bond returns is robust even after accounting for finite sample inference problems. Forecasts of excess bond returns (or bond risk premia) are countercyclical. This implies that investors are compensated for risks associated with recessions.
The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2014
This study examines the relationship between the high-yield bonds market and the stock market and indicates that stock returns lead high-yield bond returns. Specifically, this study further shows that this lead-lag relationship is more solid during bear market periods since a downward trend in the stock market implies a high likelihood of the exercise of the equity put in short position embedded in a high-yield bond at maturity. We also conducted out-of-sample forecast using a VAR model, an AR model and naïve estimation during bear market and non-bear market periods. Our results demonstrate that high-yield bond returns are better predicted by a VAR model that includes past stock returns than by an AR model or naive estimation during bear market periods, but such is not the case during non-bear market periods.
Lecturas de Economía, 2016
In this paper, I formally test for the unspanning properties of liquidity premium risk in the context of a joint Gaussian affine term structure model for zero-coupon U.S. Treasury and TIPS bonds. In the model, the liquidity factor is regarded as an additional factor that does not span the yield curve, but improves the forecast of bond risk premia. I present empirical evidence suggesting that liquidity premium indeed helps to forecast U.S. bond risk premia in spite of not being linearly spanned by the information in the joint yield curve. In addition, I show that the liquidity factor does not affect the dynamics of bonds under the pricing measure, but does affect them under the historical measure. Further, variation in the TIPS liquidity premium predicts the future evolution of the traditional yield curve factors.
The Journal of Finance, 2010
and the NBER. Luca Benzoni is at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Research Department, 230 S. LaSalle St., Chicago, IL 60604, 312-322-8499, lbenzoni@frbchi.org, and the Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota. We are grateful to
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, 2004
In 2004 all publications will carry a motif taken from the €100 banknote.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.