Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1995, Histoire Sociale-social History
The colony' s population expanded in wartime after 1775 to no more than approximately 17,000, including the military, before the influx of about 29,000 Loyalist refugees in 1783. By 1800, when the gender balance in the colony was more balanced than earlier, there were between 60,000 and 66,000 souls, most of them very poor. Marble adds much detail to this. He demonstrates that arrivals in wartime in the 1750s, 1770s, and 1790s of large numbers of troops and seamen created epidemics in Halifax and its environs. With them came hundreds of soldiers' wives and children, along with camp followers, many of whom were abandoned at Halifax when the regiments departed. As the medical men treated mainly soldiers and seamen for smallpox, Marble' s account provides a great deal more information about the poor in Halifax than hitherto has been attempted. In addition, from his laboriously researched study of those whose death we have a record of in this era, we know that of the 2,800 whose age is known half were minors; 42 per cent had not reached their eleventh birthday. His death list of almost II,500 individualsa rare historical data base -if reconstituted, could be subject to far more analysis than Marble attempts. Dr. Marble's scholarly enterprise straddles several fields. Not orny is he a widely published professor in the Technical University of Nova Scotia and director of research in Dalhousie's Departrnent of Surgery, but also a noted Nova Scotia genealogist, weIl known for bis capacity to comb almost every manuscript likely to reveal something useful to the several historical topics he simultaneously pursues. Always very generous in sharing his research with others, he places Nova Scotia historians doubly in his debt for reminding them of how little of the province's early history they have yet written.
Archivaria, 1988
As Shirley Spragge makes clear in her review article in a recent Archivaria, the bicentenary of the Loyalists inspired a renewal of scholarly interest in their history.' Among the special aspects of Loyalist history to which little attention had been paid for many years was the provincial loyalist corps, the more than fifty regiments raised in the Thirteen Colonies and elsewhere to fight on the side of the British in the American Revolutionary War. It is now almost ninety years since the Reverend William Odber Raymond published in the Collections of the New Brunswick Historical Society his comprehensive and still authoritative essay, "Loyalists in Arms ... A.D. 1775-1783."* Apart from special studies of particular regiments, however, little work was done after Archdeacon Raymond's time until the bicentenary year 1983,3 which saw a travelling exhibition, "The Loyal Americans," sponsored by the Canadian War Museum in collaboration with the New Brunswick Museum." Though the British American regiments varied widely among themselves in size, and in intensity and variety of military activity, the greater part of them had been raised and manned by loyal Americans in New York and New Jersey for service in their colony of origin. Successive British commanders-in-chief, however, tended to view them either as jumped-up militia or as cannon-fodder, and to treat them at best as adjuncts to regular troops wherever they might be required. In order to establish a broad working definition for the study of military Loyalists, Archdeacon Raymond noted "The Provincial forces in Nova Scotia as well as those of the colonies in rebellion were considered as Loyalist ~o r p s. "~ The generic term "loyalist provincial corps" therefore includes three regiments which were not raised in America, were senior to most of those which were, and were mainly fencible (that is, liable only for home service) in purpose. These three units were, in order of precedence, the Second Battalion of the Royal Highland Emigrants, the Royal Fencible Americans, and the Loyal (or "Royal") Nova Scotia Volunteers. Of the three regiments raised in Nova Scotia during the American Revolutionthey all came into existence in 1775-the Loyal Nova Scotia Volunteer Regiment was the least conventional. It was originally a civilian enterprise in which the British high command in America was not directly involved. That fact alone makes its history and more particularly, its records, interesting and significant to the military archivist. Administratively, the regiment was not typical of its contemporaries, and the paucity and
The Canadian Historical Review, 2011
Canadian Historical Review, 1993
IN 1929 HISTORIAN LAWRENCE J. BURPEE proclaimed his return 'from a visit into the past of Nova Scotia.' Writing at the end of a difficult decade for the three Maritime provinces-a decade marked by radical economic changes, widespread discontent, vigorous claims for regional 'rights,' and a massive hemorrhage of population from the region-he had no doubts about what he had seen. Carried back into the previous century by a handful of recently published books, he had glimpsed the good years, 'when the wooden sailing ship dominated ... life ... [in] the colony.' In those days, he argued, a large fleet of schooners, barques, brigs, and brigantines, built and sailed by skilful Maritimers, had scudded across the world's oceans, 'making the name of Bluenose familiar to thousands of alien communities,' and returning profits to their home ports. More than this, they had brought to mid nineteenth-century Nova Scotia 'a degree of prosperity which she had never enjoyed before, and which, from some points of view, at least, she has never enjoyed since.' This, wrote Burpee, was the province's 'Golden era? A Queen's Fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHR½) and Maggee and Hugh John Flemming scholarships from the University of New Brunswick supported Bittermann's work on Middle River. The Hardwood Hill case study is drawn from Wynn's larger investigations of pre-Confederation Pictou County and the historical geography of the Maritime provinces, supported by SSHR½, to which MacKinnon contributed as a research assistant while developing his own study of Nova Scotian agriculture. Written by Wynn, in time provided by a Canada Council Killam Fellowship, this paper draws much from the meticulous work of Bittermann and MacKinnon; it has also been shaped by continuing discussion, among us, about the patterns of rural life in nineteenth-and early twentieth-century Maritime Canada.
University of Toronto Press eBooks, 2002
IN 1929 HISTORIAN LAWRENCE J. BURPEE proclaimed his return 'from a visit into the past of Nova Scotia.' Writing at the end of a difficult decade for the three Maritime provinces-a decade marked by radical economic changes, widespread discontent, vigorous claims for regional 'rights,' and a massive hemorrhage of population from the region-he had no doubts about what he had seen. Carried back into the previous century by a handful of recently published books, he had glimpsed the good years, 'when the wooden sailing ship dominated ... life ... [in] the colony.' In those days, he argued, a large fleet of schooners, barques, brigs, and brigantines, built and sailed by skilful Maritimers, had scudded across the world's oceans, 'making the name of Bluenose familiar to thousands of alien communities,' and returning profits to their home ports. More than this, they had brought to mid nineteenth-century Nova Scotia 'a degree of prosperity which she had never enjoyed before, and which, from some points of view, at least, she has never enjoyed since.' This, wrote Burpee, was the province's 'Golden era? A Queen's Fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHR½) and Maggee and Hugh John Flemming scholarships from the University of New Brunswick supported Bittermann's work on Middle River. The Hardwood Hill case study is drawn from Wynn's larger investigations of pre-Confederation Pictou County and the historical geography of the Maritime provinces, supported by SSHR½, to which MacKinnon contributed as a research assistant while developing his own study of Nova Scotian agriculture. Written by Wynn, in time provided by a Canada Council Killam Fellowship, this paper draws much from the meticulous work of Bittermann and MacKinnon; it has also been shaped by continuing discussion, among us, about the patterns of rural life in nineteenth-and early twentieth-century Maritime Canada.
Formative Years, 1891-1924 (CHR 74, 1 (March 1993): 153-5) is laced with misleading statements, I would request that you print this letter as a correction. 1 Contrary to Luciuk's description of the book as 'a synthesis of many secondary studies dealing with the Ukrainian-Canadian experience,' it is a synthesis of secondary works on Canadian, Ukrainian, and Ukrainian-Canadian history. More importantly, it is also based on (i) archival research (at the National Archives of Canada and several provincial, church, and Ukrainian community archives); (ii) a thorough and systematic reading of the Ukrainian immigrant press (1893-1923), relevant English-and Frenchlanguage newspapers and periodicals, and hundreds of Ukrainian-Canadian almanacs and commemorative books; (iii) government publications (Sessional Papers, Census Reports, Labour Gazette); and (iv) city and mercantile directories. Even the most cursory perusal of the endnotes and the bibliographical note makes this abundantly clear. 2 Contrary to Luciuk's intimation that the book is 'a product of several years of team research, organized by the director of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies and finally written up by Orest Martynowych,' my M^ thesis provided the interpretive framework for the book (as noted in the preface) and most of the research was carried out by me. Of the four research assistants mentioned in the acknowledgments, two worked on the project for less than one month, one worked part-time for six months, and only one (whose contribution is fully recorded) was associated with the project for any length of time and performed more than the most routine tasks. 3 Contrary to Luciuk's suggestion that I seem 'to have been unaware of several major new studies dealing with Canada's Ukrainians' and his implication that my failure to mention these studies may have been 'intentional,' all relevant studies are mentioned in the endnotes. Only two volumes published in the late 1980s/early 1990s, both co-edited by Luciuk, are not mentioned: the first because it dealt with the period after 1924, the second because it was published in November 1991, more than two months after the publication of my book. 4 Contrary to Luciuk's assertion that I have 'indulged in a taste for polemics' in the endnotes, I have drawn attention, in several endnotes, only to factual errors, questionable interpretations, and methodological deficiencies in some of the secondary sources cited (including at least one pamphlet published by Luciuk). NOTES AND COMMENTS 75 5 Instead of providing substantive criticism of the book's major themes and interpretations, Luciuk disparages my work by associating it with that of historians who recount 'in fdliopiestic [sic] terms the hardships and triumphs of ... prairie sodbusters.' He also dismisses as irrelevant the 'religious, political and socioeconomic affiliations' of the first immigrants, and maintains that I fail to provide satisfactory answers for historians interested in the modern Ukrainian-Canadian community with its urban, Ontario-based, leadership composed of 'post-Second World War [immigrants] and their descendents.' Quite apart from the fact that the last point is a rather curious criterion for evaluating a work about the period 1891-1924, many of the issues examined in my book -anxieties about the 'latinization' of the Ukrainian Catholic Church, concerns about bilingual/second-language education, hostilities between nationalists and communists, and tensions between Ukrainians and
>>><<< ENGLISH GENOCIDE IN NOVA SCOTIA ABSTRACT Many countries committed appalling inhumanities during colonization, but I am concerned with the English crown’s genocide committed against the French Acadians and First Nations’ Mi’kmaq in Nova Scotia, and which it adamantly refuses to concede. By the 20th Century, English monarchs had colonized twenty-three per cent of the world’s people, twenty-four per cent of its real estate,[1] and was credited with the murder of at least 37,000,000 of those whom it controlled during its tenure as the largest and longest colonizers in history.[2] But, if one state presumes to occupy another state and annihilate its peoples, it must in the same breath justify its position by creating the long-term dissemination of the communication of fiction: propaganda. The English enlisted its most acclaimed and thought-provoking scribes in the country to hone this disinformation, and operated under its aegis for centuries. I went to school in Nova Scotia but learned nothing of the scalping bounty, or the scorched earth strategy, or the residential school in Shubenacadie, or the white, Anglo settlers who arbitrarily supplanted the Mi’kmaq and the Acadians. Instead, it was England’s relentless, remorseless rhetoric of its superiority. Several works on genocide have been published but none take the carnage committed by the English in Nova Scotia into account and this essay should expose the realities of the crown’s atrocities there. [1] British Empire. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Empire [2] See list end of manuscript. Not included are persons in situ of all English occupied nations.
2010
This research is focussed on the collection and analysis of oral histories and diaries of Fort St. John Métis Elder May Barrette. By delving into May's life through oral histories, personal diaries, and other archival research, I am constructing a microhistorical biography of one exceptional-typical woman's life to contribute to a more comprehensive history of Métis women in northeastern British Columbia and the Peace River country. This research looks at diaries and oral histories as historical sources, and explores the details of May's life and her stories about women in the community. May's own accounts of her childhood, coming to the Peace River as a pioneer, leaving to pursue an education, returning to start a family and taking on a self described role as a "diary keeper," exemplifies the significance of a microhistorical subject. The life of an exceptionaltypical individual, like May, offers historians a window into the experiences of women in one of the last pioneer areas in Canada. Her voice, telling individual as well as community stories, is doubly-relational; May's life story touches not just on the broader issues affecting her and her family, but also those of women in the Peace and her community as a whole. Through sharing her diaries and stories May made sure that these stories would not just continue to be told and after she was gone, but that the stories of the women in Fort St. John were treated as a valuable part of the area's history. First and foremost I would like to give my deepest thanks to, and for, May and Bob Barrette. Your generosity in contributing your stories to this research and your dedication to educating has been a gift to me, to your family, and by extension your entire community. It's a pleasure to know you, and I cannot thank you enough.
2008
This diversity of subjects in terms of individuals, institutions, and infrastructure is matched by the diversity of methodologies-from traditional medical biography to social history revisionism to class and gender analysis. Three are set in the 20th century, with Island Doctor examining a 19th-century story. The slate of authors likewise reflects the multi-disciplinarity of health history. W.G. Godfrey and Peter Twohig are professional historians while Ronald Rompkey is a writer and professor of literature and David Shephard is a physician for whom history is an avocation. Making comparisons among these authors' markedly different styles and approaches presents significant challenges. Nevertheless, this review will link them together by focusing on how each contributes to our growing understanding of the interplay of region and health and, in particular, the political, social, and cultural importance of region. Ronald Rompkey's work editing The Labrador Memoir of Dr. Harry Paddon, 1912-1938 adds another title to the several already produced by this author about individuals involved in missionary work in Labrador. 1 This most recent contribution is a significant addition to the history of health in the region because Paddon was principal physician to the world-famous Grenfell Mission for over 20 years and his memoir offers a "behind the scenes" look at those mission activities. Over the course of his career, which spanned the first three decades of the 20th century, Paddon covered over 25,000 miles to build and maintain an infrastructure of health care services in an area that had hitherto 1 Ronald Rompkey's first contribution was the well-known title, Grenfell of Labrador: A Biography
Loyalist Trails, , March 11, 2018
Over 230 years ago approximately 20,000 United Empire Loyalists came to Nova Scotia as refugees after the American Revolution. How can they be remembered ? Their presence is noticeable in Annapolis and Digby Counties in the names of communities, in the Loyalist era churches and cemeteries with their gravestones, in buildings and monuments, interpretative signs and plaques, and in street signs.
Urban History Review, 1990
Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne.
Histoire Sociale-social History, 2016
Histoire sociale/Social history, 2019
This article discusses understandings of manhood in Liverpool, Nova Scotia, during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. By means of the voluminous diary kept by Simeon Perkins, a man of local prominence, it explores the social responses within this rural seafaring community to how men chose strategies for gaining social status, exercising public power, and juggling private interest and public service. Across northeastern North America, capitalist ideals of independent manhood were gradually replacing moral ideals of communal manhood, which ultimately strained networks of reciprocity both within and outside the family. Yet by placing Perkins alongside Benajah Collins, another prominent Liverpudlian, this article also reveals that those who drifted too far from morally grounded communal ideals of manhood continued to find themselves ostracized within their immediate communities. * Elizabeth Mancke is Professor of History and Canada Research Chair in Atlantic Canada Studies at the University of New Brunswick. Colin Grittner currently teaches history at Douglas College and has held Social Science and Humanites Research Council-funded postdoctoral fellowships at the University of British Columbia and the University of New Brunswick. The authors would like to thank Gerry Hallowell for hosting the Atlantic Canada Workshop in Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, where Elizabeth presented the first iteration of this essay many years ago, and a SSHRC Partnership Development Grant (#890-2014-0116), which funded Colin's postdoctoral fellowship at UNB in 2018 and made possible the collaboration. The authors are also grateful for the useful reviewer and editorial comments that contributed to the final version, and to Stéphanie O'Neill for her advice on historiography. 258 Histoire sociale / Social History sont trop éloignés de l'idéal communautaire de masculinité basé sur la morale ont continué à se retrouver ostracisés au sein même de leur milieu immédiat. ON HIS 62ND BIRTHDAY, May 4, 1798, Simeon Perkins reflected on his 36 years as a resident of Liverpool, Nova Scotia, a rural seafaring community on the province's South Shore. Over those years Perkins held many roles both public and private: father, trader, slaveholder, ship owner, member of the Nova Scotia assembly, colonel in the militia, county treasurer, proprietors' clerk, husband, brother, son-in-law, justice of the peace, judge of probates. 1 In those roles, and despite them, Perkins had not prospered. Now, at 62, he found himself in "Circumstances Very low," having "Spent my time to very little purpose for myself, much of it … taken up in publick Business, to very little profit, and a great deal of Anxiety and Trouble." Although he noted that "Many that were poor boys when I came, have grown Rich, and Some Grown Proud," he himself had not made the easy money. He had lost much to risky long-distance trade and, by his "lenity[,] lost many Large Sums due to me." 2 It was not just his own impression. When he died in 1812, his obituary, published in Halifax in The Weekly Chronicle, emphasized his willingness to act as an "indefatigable servant of the Public." It noted that his service had caused "no small injury to his private concerns" and lauded him for "His great wisdom, general knowledge, piety and benevolence, and uncommon usefulness." These qualities, the obituary concluded, had endeared him as "a Father" to all of Liverpool's residents. 3 By the time he died in 1812, Perkins had achieved a level of public esteem as high, if not greater, than any of his contemporaries in Liverpool. Perkins's almost overdrawn life of working in the community interest ended during an era when gender roles were undergoing significant transformations. Perhaps more than any other Liverpudlian at the time, Perkins exemplified what historian Anthony Rotundo has called "communal manhood": a gendered ideal prevalent in the seventeenth-and eighteenth-century English-speaking world where a man "fulfilled himself through public usefulness more than his economic success." By the late eighteenth century, however, this ideal had begun to shift. Perhaps most markedly in what would become the northeastern United States, but also throughout British North America, men increasingly strove to present themselves as independent and self-made, defining "themselves through personal success in
Histoire Sociale-social History, 2016
Acadiensis: Journal of the History of the Atlantic Region / Revue d’histoire de la region atlantique, 2019
Acadiensis, 2013
Maritime Canada announced that it was "Planters Studies Series, No. 1." 1 The implication of more volumes to come was boldly confident, and realized over the next 25 years with the publication of four more volumes. 2 As Margaret Conrad explains in her introduction to the first volume, the New Englanders who settled in Nova Scotia in the 1760s had been relatively obscure figures in Canadian history. 3 John Bartlet Brebner, after spending a good portion of his scholarly career studying them, observed in the foreword to his 1937 The Neutral Yankees of Nova Scotia: A Marginal Colony During the Revolutionary Years that he had perhaps wasted his time in writing the study and, by extension, the reader's time by making the book longer than the topic probably warranted. In that book and his earlier one (the 1927 New England's Outpost) Brebner emphasized the influence of lower New England on northeastern North America, and especially Acadia and Nova Scotia, during the 17th and 18th centuries-an emphasis that influenced scholarship for most of the 20th century. In his 1986 The Shaping of America, for instance, Donald Meinig, following Brebner, calls the entire northeast, from Long Island to Labrador, "Greater New England." George Rawlyk, on the other hand, writing almost two generations after Brebner, struggled to step out of his long shadow-eventually escaping it by studying the region's religious history, beginning with Henry Alline (the New Light evangelist of New England Planter descent). 4
Acadiensis, 1999
ACCORDING TO THE COLONIAL PATRIOT, the "coincidence" of two events would mark December 1827 as an auspicious moment in the history of Pictou County, and indeed of Nova Scotia more generally. The first event was the inaugural issue of the newspaper, itself designed to "invigorate" local society and "prove to every individual a stimulation to exertion". 1 The weekly's editor, Jotham Blanchard promoted "liberal principles" and "correct morals" and, like his heroes, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and William Cobbett, maintained a laissez-faire position on economic issues and advocated regulation in the social sphere. 2 In an era when reform loomed large in England, the Patriot's editor saw his stance as forwardlooking and progressive; he thought his paper's advice and opinion were the path to "improvement", and all that was entailed by that most critical term of 19th-century social discourse. The other event the editor noted was the "arrival" of the "Royal Mining Association", or more correctly, the General Mining Association (GMA). Blanchard believed it would loom large in the county's future and represented a "harbinger of illimitable prosperity", but he overstated the "coincidence". The only "arrival" related to the GMA was that of their 20-horsepower steam engine; the resident manager, Richard Smith, had been on site since June with equipment and more than 100 miners and other tradesmen. Blanchard enthusiastically extolled the virtues of the Association, and especially Smith, whose "constant and persevering labour furnishes a useful illustration of the way wealth and respectability are acquired in Britain". The newspaperman, although correct that Smith was a first-rate mining engineer, was evidently unaware that the Englishman was in Nova Scotia because he had lost the family fortune. 3 It is ironic 1 Colonial Patriot (Pictou) 14 December 1827. The author thanks Alison Forrest, Ian McKay and three anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments. As usual, however, what is muddled is solely mine.
1984
ENGLISH-CANADIAN HISTORIANS have long had a love affair with the biographical approach to history. 1 In fact, prior to the First World War biography was the preferred form of writing history in Canada. Few of the publications produced during this period are of much value today. They were written according to a rigid formula, were based upon little or no research, were completely uncritical of their subjects, and were governed by a set of conventions which limited what could be revealed about the private lives of their subjects. In the 1920s a new breed of professional historians revamped the biographical form. 2 Their studies were based on meticulous research into primary sources, were much less hagiographie than their predecessors, and emphasized the times rather than the lives of their subjects. But frequently these became totally depersonalized accounts; the protagonists lost their personalities and became merely products of their times. The most damning critic of this tendency was Donald Creighton, who stressed that the basic function of a biographer must be to portray the course of an indvidual's life as it evolved over time. In the 1950s Creighton published his highly imaginative biography of John A. Macdonald, which quickly "became the standard against which succeeding lives were measured". 3 Since the 1950s there has been a veritable flood of biographies. Most of the major and many of the minor pre-Confederation politicians have been the subject of scholarly studies, and several of the Central Canadian politicians-including the leading fathers of Confederation-have even been honoured with two-volume treatments of their lives. The Maritimes, as usual, have been less well served. In an earlier period when the struggle for responsible government was seen as the central event in Canadian history at least token attention was paid to the Maritimes. But the Maritime politicians appeared neither as colourful nor as controversial as their Central Canadian counterparts and they never attracted the same scholarly interest as John Strachan or William Lyon Mackenzie. Following the Second World War, as Canadian historians shifted their focus to the Confederation era, Maritimers remained less attractive as subjects because they were seen as playing a less significant-often indeed a negative-role in the events which led to Confederation. The growth of interest in regional studies in the 1970s revived interest in the Maritimes but from a very 1 This has not been true of French-Canadian academics.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.