Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Supersonic Flow Separation with Application to Rocket Engine Nozzles

Profile image of Jan ÖstlundJan Östlund

2005, Applied Mechanics Reviews

https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1894402
visibility

…

description

31 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

The past decade has seen a qualitative advancement of our understanding of physical phenomena involved in flow separation in supersonic nozzles; in particular, the problem of side loads due to asymmetrical pressure loads, which constitutes a major restraint in the design of nozzles for satellite launchers. The development in this field is to a large extent motivated by the demand for high-performance nozzles in rocket engineering. The present paper begins with an introduction to the physical background of shock-boundary-layer interactions in basic 2D configurations, and then proceeds to internal axisymmetric nozzle flow. Special attention is given to past and recent efforts in modeling and prediction, turning physical insight into applied engineering tools. Finally, an overview is given on different technical solutions to the problem if separation and side loads, discussed in the context of rocket technology.

Related papers

Flow Processes in Rocket Engine Nozzles with Focus on Flow Separation and Side-Loads
Jan Östlund

2002

The increasing demand for higher performance in rocket launchers promotes the development of nozzles with higher performance, which is basically achieved by increasing the expansion ratio. However, this may lead to flow separation and ensuing unstationary, asymmetric forces, so-called side-loads, which may present life-limiting constraints on both the nozzle itself and other engine components. Substantial gains can be made in the engine performance if this problem can be overcome, and hence different methods of separation control have been suggested, however none has so far been implemented in full scale, due to the uncertainties involved in modelling and predicting the flow phenomena involved. The present thesis presents a comprehensive, up-to-date review of supersonic flow separation and side-loads in internal nozzle flows with ensuing side-loads. In addition to results available in the literature, it also contains previously unpublished material based on this author's work, whose main contributions are (i) discovery the role of transition between different separation patterns for side-load generation, (ii) experimental verification of side-loads due to aeroelastic effects and (iii) contributions to the analysis and scaling of side-loads. A physical description of turbulent shock wave boundary layer interactions is given, based on theoretical concepts, computational results and experimental observation. This is followed by an in-depth discussion of different approaches for predicting the phenomena. This includes methods for predicting shock-induced separation, models for predicting side-load levels and aeroelastic coupling effects. Examples are presented to illustrate the status of various methods, and their advantages and shortcomings are discussed. The third part of the thesis focuses on how to design sub-scale models that are able to capture the relevant physics of the full-scale rocket engine nozzle. Scaling laws like those presented in here are indispensable for extracting side-load correlations from sub-scale tests and applying them to full-scale nozzles. The present work was performed at VAC's Space Propulsion Division within the framework of European space cooperation.

View PDFchevron_right
Numerical study of shock/boundary layer interaction in supersonic overexpanded nozzles
Abdellah Hadjadj

A numerical study, using a mixed finite element/finite volume method on unstructured meshes adapted for compressible flows, is conducted to investigate turbulent boundary-layer separation in overexpanded subscale supersonic nozzles including shock/shock and shock/boundary layer interactions. Two test-cases are investigated, namely a TIC (Truncated Ideal Contour) nozzle and a TOP (Thrust Optimized Parabolic contour) nozzle with a secondary jet injection. Particular attention is paid to the appearance of a recirculation region downstream of the Mach disc as well as in the vicinity of the secondary nozzle exit. The results so obtained are analyzed and compared with the experimental data. The results suggest that very different shock structures and flow separation may appear depending on the nozzle contour as well as on the operating pressure and temperature ratios. In the case of TOP nozzle, the simulations reveal the existence of a small recirculation bubble at the vicinity of the secondary injection, due to a shock/boundary layer interaction. In addition, it has been shown that, at high temperature ratios, compressibility effects on the growth rate of the mixing layer, which develops between the main stream and the secondary jet injection, become significant and cannot be neglected in the computation.

View PDFchevron_right
Scale analysis and experimental observations of shock-induced turbulent boundary layer separation in nozzles
Russell Keanini

European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, 2007

Time average shock-induced boundary layer separation is investigated using scale analyses, analytical modeling, and experiments. While the study focuses on turbulent boundary layer separation in overexpanded rocket nozzles, many of the analyses presented apply to the broad family of free interaction, shock-separated flows in which the structure of the boundary layer-shock interaction zone is self-similar and independent of the shock generator. The scale analyses lead to two approximate expressions for the wall pressure ratio at separation; over a range of separation Mach numbers, both models provide reasonable predictions of observed separation pressure ratios. The second model, representing a refinement of the first, appears to provide a fairly general description of free interaction separation: the model approximately captures separation pressure ratios observed in supersonic flow over backward facing steps and in the case of overexpanded nozzle flow, provides predictions that are consistent with the free interaction model. Experiments are carried out in a sub-scale nozzle under overexpanded, cold-flow conditions. The principal observations are as follows: (i) For the range of separation Mach numbers investigated (5.0 M i 5.4), nominal separation line locations can be predicted with reasonable accuracy using the classical generalized quasi-one-dimensional compressible flow model and an appropriate separation criterion. (ii) Over the same range of overexpanded flow conditions, the time-average pressure rise over the shock interaction zone can be accurately fit by the free interaction model.

View PDFchevron_right
Impact of the convergent geometric profile on boundary layer separation in the supersonic over-expanded nozzle
abdelkrim Liazid

Open Physics

This article aims to conduct a numerical investigation of phenomena induced by gas expansion in chemical propulsion nozzles. A numerical simulation of full-scale flat convergent-divergent nozzle geometry using the finite volume method on structured meshes is performed to predict the change in the convergent geometry on the boundary layer separation resulting from a shock/shock and shock/boundary layer. Two turbulence models are tested, namely, the k−ε and k−ω shear-stress transport (SST) models. Three steps are considered to achieve this work. First, 10 numerical schemes are tested to select the accurate one. The findings of the first step are used to predict the boundary layer separation in a supersonic overexpanded nozzle. The available experimental data from the NASA Langley Research Center are used to validate the results. The third step concerns investigating the impact of the convergent geometric profile on the downstream flow of the nozzle. The obtained results are analyzed a...

View PDFchevron_right
Shock structure in separated nozzle flows
Marcello Onofri

Shock Waves, 2009

In the case of high overexpansion, the exhaust jet of the supersonic nozzle of rocket engines separates from nozzle wall because of the large adverse pressure gradient. Correspondingly, to match the pressure of the separated flow region, an oblique shock is generated which evolves through the supersonic jet starting approximately at the separation point. This shock reflects on the nozzle axis with a Mach reflection. Thus, a peculiar Mach reflection takes place whose features depend on the upstream flow conditions, which are usually not uniform. The expected features of Mach reflection may become much difficult to predict, depending on the nozzle shape and the position of the separation point along the divergent section of the nozzle.

View PDFchevron_right
Experimental and Computational Analysis of Shock Structure in a Supersonic Contoured Nozzle
Jijo Unnikrishnan

International Journal of Engineering Research and, 2020

Flow separation in a supersonic contoured nozzle whilst operating under over expanded regime is an inevitable fluid dynamic phenomenon. The flow field comprise formation of complex shock structures and its interaction with the viscous boundary layer. Profound number of researches on various types of contoured nozzle profiles have been undertaken to better understand the said phenomenon. The present study is focused on further understanding the fundamentals associated with formation of shocks and its structural transformation under varying NPR for a defined area ratio. Flow visualization utilizing Schlieren photography has enabled to capture the details of shock and its structure along with other phenomenon viz boundary layer separation, shock boundary layer interaction, aftershocks etc. The locations of shock captured experimentally have also been ascertained with computational generated data for various NPR and the results have been found quite comparable. Keywords—Nozzle, superson...

View PDFchevron_right
SIMULATION OF SUPERSONIC FLOW CHARACTERISTICS IN A GROOVED DIVERGENT ROCKET NOZZLE USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
IJRAME Journal, Douglas Boah

IJRAME PUBLICATIONS, 2025

The convergent-divergent design of the nozzle of a rocket engine is the most defining part of it. The nature of the nozzle design enables it to convert the high pressure, temperature and relatively low velocity adiabatic expanding gaseous fluids into very high velocity and thrust gases. The rapidly exiting gas as a consequence of the rapid expansion process results in low pressure and temperature. It is critical in research to find out the influence of modification (grooves) would have in the application and design of a reaction device such as a rocket engine. The Computational Fluid Dynamics software, Analysis System (ANSYS) was employed together with necessary boundary conditions to design and simulate such a modified rocket engine nozzle. The interaction and relationship existing among the pressure, velocity, Mach number and temperature in the grooved divergent rocket nozzle was found and observed. From the plots and nozzle simulation contours, both velocity and Mach number increased rapidly along the nozzle area but decreased steadily. Pressure varied directly withtemperature and inversely with density. It is observed that divergent nozzle grooving influences the velocity, Mach number, pressure and temperature within the divergent nozzle area of a rocket nozzle.

View PDFchevron_right
Turbulence Models of Separated Flow in Shock Wave Thrust Vector Nozzle
K.W. Chau

Turbulence Models of Separated Flow in Shock Wave Thrust Vector Nozzle, 2013

In the present paper, based on typical jet flows in shock wave thrust vector nozzles, turbulence modeling in gas flow dynamics has been numerically explored in 2-D laval nozzle which has a secondary injection on one side of its divergent portion in order to simulate the complex strong pressure gradient and accurately capture flow separation point. Nine turbulence models have been adopted and assessed by comparing the obtained results which involve flow separation point and static wall pressure with the available experimental data. Another 3-D nozzle model is simulated using five different turbulence models and results are also compared with experimental data. The numerical results reveal that Goldberg's realizable k-epsilon model gives the best results compared with other models in predicting the shock wave position and separation point, while the SA model shows its advantage in predicting the static wall pressure under certain conditions compared to the Goldberg's realizable k-epsilon model. The computational results were analyzed and the change of the shock structure in different NPRs was discussed in laval nozzle with a secondary flow. Keywords: turbulence model, thrust vector nozzle, static wall pressure, shock wave

View PDFchevron_right
Experimental analysis of unsteady separated flows in a supersonic planar nozzle
P. Reijasse

Shock Waves, 2005

The unsteady aspects of shock-inducedseparation patterns have been investigated inside a Mach 2 planar nozzle. The mean location of the shock can vary by changing, relatively to the nozzle throat, the height of the second throat which is positioned downstream of the square test section. This study focuses on the wall pressure fluctuations spectra and the unsteady behaviour of the shock. Symmetric shock configurations appear both for the largest openings of the second throat, and for the smallest openings. For an intermediate opening the shock system exhibits asymmetrical configurations. A coating with roughnesses sticked on the throat part of the nozzle in order to modify the state of the incoming boundary layers (from smooth to rought turbulent statement) is a driver for the asymmetry. The fluctuating displacements of the shock patterns were analysed by using an ultra fast shadowgraph visualization technique. A spectral analysis of the unsteady wall pressure measurements has revealed low frequency phenomena governed by large structure dynamics in the separated flows.

View PDFchevron_right
Unsteadiness of Flow Separation and End-Effects Regime in a Thrust-Optimized Contour Rocket Nozzle
Anh Thi Nguyen

Flow Turbulence and Combustion, 2003

Turbulent flow separation in over-expanded rocket nozzles is investigated experimentally in a sub-scale model nozzle fed with cold air and having a thrust-optimized contour. Depending upon the pressure ratio either a free shock separation (FSS) or a restricted shock separation (RSS) is observed with a significant hysteresis between these two flow regimes. It is shown that the RSS configuration may involve several separated regions. Analysis of wall pressure fluctuations give quantitative information on the fluctuating pressure field directly connected with the occurrence of significant side loads. Direct measurements of the evolution of the side loads with respect to the pressure ratio show the occurrence of three distinct peaks which are explained by the wall pressure fluctuations measurements.

View PDFchevron_right

References (45)

  1. Humble R W, Henry G N and Larson W J (1995), Space propulsion analysis and design, McGraw-Hill, Inc., ISBN-0-07- 031329-6.
  2. Isakowitz S J (1991), International reference guide to space launch systems, AIAA Technical Publications, Washington DC.
  3. Östlund J and Bigert M (1999), A subscale investigation on side-loads in sea level rocket nozzles, 35 th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 99-2759.
  4. Nave L H and Coffey G A (1973), Sea-level side-loads in high area ratio rocket engines, 9 th Propulsion Conference, AIAA Paper 73-1284.
  5. Schmucker R (1973), Flow processes in overexpanding nozzles of chemical rocket engines (In German), Report TB-7,- 10,-14, Technical University Munich, Munich.
  6. Larson E, Ratekin G, O´Connor G (1981), Structural response of the SSME fuel feedline to unsteady shock oscillations, 52 nd Shock and Vibration Symposium, New Orleans.
  7. Dumnov G E (1996), Unsteady side-loads acting on the nozzle with developed separation zone, 32 nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 96-3220.
  8. Pekkari L-O (1993), Aeroelastic stability of supersonic nozzles with separated flow, 29 th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 93-2588.
  9. Pekkari L-O (1994), Aeroelastic analysis of side-loads in supersonic nozzles with separated flow, 30 th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 94-3377.
  10. Salikuddin M (1992), Unsteady pressures on exhaust nozzle interior surfaces -empirical correlations for prediction, 14 th DGLR/AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, Proceedings. Vol. 2 (A93-19126 05-71), Bonn, Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Luft- und Raumfahrt, pp. 873-881.
  11. Darren R and Hidalgo H (1995), Fluctuating pressure analysis of a 2-d SSME nozzle air flow test, In its Thirteenth Workshop for Computational Fluid Dynamic Applications in Rocket Propulsion and Launch Vehicle Technology, (SEE N96-29750 11-34) pp. 723-743.
  12. Foster C and Cowles F (1949), Experimental study of gas flow separation in overexpanded exhaust nozzles for rocket motors, JPL Progress Report 4-103, Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, CA.
  13. Green L (1953), Flow separation in rocket nozzles, ARS Journal, 23(1).
  14. Summerfield M, Foster C and Swan W (1954), Flow separation in overexpanded supersonic exhaust nozzles, Jet Propulsion, 24.
  15. Campbell C and Farley J (1960), Performance of several conical convergent-divergent rocket type exhaust nozzles, NASA TN D-467, NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland OH.
  16. Schilling T W (1962), Flow separation in rocket nozzle, M. S. Thesis, University of Buffalo, New York.
  17. Kalt S and Badal D (1965), Conical rocket nozzle performance under flow separated condition, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2(3).
  18. Arens, M and Spiegler E (1963), Shock-Induced boundary layer separation in overexpanded conical exhaust nozzles, AIAA Journal, 1(3).
  19. Sunley H and Ferriman D (1964), Jet separation in conical nozzles, Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 68.
  20. Lawrence R A (1967), Symmetrical and unsymmetrical separation in supersonic nozzles, Research report 67-1, Southern Methodist University, Dallas.
  21. Chen C, Chakravarchy S and Hung C (1994), Numerical investigation of separated nozzle flows, AIAA Journal, 32(9).
  22. Nasuti F and Onofri M (1996), Viscous and inviscid vortex generation during nozzle flow transients, 34 th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, AIAA Paper 96-0076.
  23. NASA (1976), NASA space vehicle design criteria (chemical propulsion), liquid rocket engine nozzles, NASA SP-8120, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland OH.
  24. Crocco L and Probstein R (1964), The peak pressure rise across an oblique shock emerging from a turbulent boundary layer over a plane surface, Princeton University, Princeton NJ.
  25. Carriere P (1966), Comments on computational methods of viscous effects in propulsion nozzles (In French), DGRR/WGLR Symposium, also published as ONERA TP 408.
  26. Carrière P, Sirieix M and Solignac J-L (1968), Propértiés de similitude des phénomènes de décollement laminaires ou turbulents en écoulemnt supersonique non uniforme, 12 th International Congress of Applied Mechanics, Stanford University, Stanford, also ONERA TP N° 659F.
  27. Lewis J E, Kubota T and Lees L (1968), Experimental investigation of supersonic laminar, two-dimensional boundary layer separation in a compression corner with and without wall cooling, AIAA Journal, 6, 7-14.
  28. Dumnov G E, Nikulin G Z, Voinov A L and Zyuzin V I (1995), Nozzle flow separation and unsteady side-loads, Conference on Propulsive Flows in Space Transportation System, pp. 798-816.
  29. Kudryavtsev V M (1975), Fundamentals of theory and calculations of liquid rocket engines (In Russian), Moscow High School, Moscow.
  30. Malik T I and Tagirov R K (1988), A semiempirical method for calculating separated turbulent flow in a conical Laval nozzle in the reexpansion mode (In Russian), Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Izvestiia, Mekhanika Zhidkosti i Gaza , 60-66.
  31. Tuovila W J and Land N S (1968), Experimental study of aeroelastic instability of overexpanded rocket nozzle extensions, NASA TN D-4471, Langley Research Center, Langely Station, Hampton, Va.
  32. Mattsson J (changed name to Östlund 1999), Högman U and Torngren L (1998), A sub-scale test programme on investigation of flow separation and side-loads in rocket nozzles, Proceedings of the 3 rd European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics of Space Vehicles, ESA SP-426, 373-378.
  33. Mattsson J (changed name to Östlund 1999) (1998), Subscale testing of flexible nozzles, In Proceedings of European Seminar on rocket nozzle flows, CNES, Paris.
  34. Östlund J, Damgaard T, Frey M (2001), Side-load phenomena in highly overexpanded rocket nozzles, 37 th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2001-3684.
  35. Frey M and Hagemann G (1998), Status of flow separation prediction in rocket nozzles, 34 th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 98-3619.
  36. Terhardt M, Hagemann G and Frey M (1999), Flow separation and side-load behaviour of the Vulcain engine, 35 th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 99-2762.
  37. Östlund J (2002), Flow processes in rocket engine nozzles with focus on flow separation and side-loads, Licentiate Thesis TRITA-MEK 2002:09, Royal Institute of Thechnology, Stockholm, Sweden
  38. Hagemman G, Terhardt M, Frey M, Reijasse P, Onofri M, Nasuti F and Östlund J (2000), Flow separation and side-loads in rocket nozzles, 4 th International Symposium on Liquid Space Propulsion.
  39. Frey M, Ryden R, Aziary de Roquefort T, Hagemann G, James P, Kachler T, Reijasse P, Schwane R and Stark R (2002), European cooperation on flow separation control, 4 th International Conference on Launcher Technology "Space Liquid Propulsion".
  40. Stanke H (1986), Test report on the results on HM60-subscale test series 3, Vulcain Ne Project Report HM RT 110 0000 501, MBB, Ottobrun.
  41. Hagemann G, Alting J and Preclik D (2001), Scalability discussion for rocket nozzle flows based on subscale and full- scale testing, 4 th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles.
  42. Frey M and Hagemann G (1999), Flow separation and side-loads in rocket nozzles, 35 th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 99-2815.
  43. Frey M, Stark, R, Cieaki H K, Quessard F and Kwan W (2000), Subscale nozzle testing at the P6.2 test stand, 36 th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2000-3777.
  44. Reijasse P, Servel P and Hallard R (1999), Synthesis of the 1998-1999 ONERA works in the FSCD working group, ONERA RTS 49/4361 DAFE/Y, ONERA, Châtillon-sous-Bagneux.
  45. Tomita T, Takahashi M, Ueda S, Tamura H and Aoki K (2001), Visualization of the formation of separation bubbles on a bell-shaped nozzle surface in relation to serious side-load, 37 th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2001-3559.

Related papers

Flow separation modes and side phenomena in an overexpanded nozzle
bosko rasuo
View PDFchevron_right
Influence of Fluid–Thermal–Structural Interaction on Boundary Layer Flow in Rectangular Supersonic Nozzles
Kiran Siddappaji

Aerospace

View PDFchevron_right
Side loads and thermal loads in rocket nozzles. Overview of the CNES-ONERA ATAC programme
philippe reijasse

International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation, 2011

View PDFchevron_right
Numerical analysis of supersonic- subsonic flow in the convergent- divergent nozzle along with the shock and comparison with analytical results
ali kargar

2012

View PDFchevron_right
Supersonic Propulsion: Inlet Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interaction in a Diffuser
Jordan Ruffner

2020

View PDFchevron_right
Assessment of turbulence modeling for gas flow in two-dimensional convergent–divergent rocket nozzle
abdelkarim hegab

Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011

View PDFchevron_right
Modeling and Simulation of a Supersonic Convergent Divergent Nozzle Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
Asif Kabir

5th International Conference on Engineering, Research, Innovation and Education (ICERIE), 2019At: Shahjalal University of Science & Technology (SUST), Sylhet, bangladesh, 2019

View PDFchevron_right
COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF SUPERSONIC JETS FROM RECTANGULAR NOZZLES
IJESMR Journal
View PDFchevron_right
Three-dimensional simulation of rocket nozzles with multi-jet interaction using shock-unsteadiness model
Pratikkumar Raje

2019

View PDFchevron_right
Design and numerical analysis on supersonic rocket nozzle
Dr Chennabasappa Hampali

Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 2022

View PDFchevron_right
Relation between shock unsteadiness and the origin of side-loads inside a thrust optimized parabolic rocket nozzle
Oskar Haidn

Aerospace Science and Technology, 2006

View PDFchevron_right
Numerical simulation of shock waves and their interaction in a supersonic rocket engine operating at different conditions
Farhad Davoudzadeh

Journal of Visualization, 2004

View PDFchevron_right
Numerically analyzed supersonic flow structure behind the exit of a two-dimensional micro nozzle
Prof. Jeong Park

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2008

View PDFchevron_right
Thrust vectoring effects of a transverse gas injection into a supersonic cross flow of an axisymmetric convergent-divergent nozzle
viviana lago

Progress in Propulsion Physics, 2013

View PDFchevron_right
Thrust Vectoring of a Fixed Axisymmetric Supersonic Nozzle Using the Shock-Vector Control Method
roberto marsilio

Fluids, 2021

View PDFchevron_right
Altitude-compensating axisymmetric supersonic nozzle design and flow analysis
hakim Kbab

INCAS BULLETIN

View PDFchevron_right
Computational Study of Supersonic Flow Through a Converging Diverging Nozzle
Jamal Uddin Ahamed

2011

View PDFchevron_right
Shock waves formation from a converging-diverging nozzle
El Mehdi Laamarti

Gas Dynamics

View PDFchevron_right
Verification and validation of numerical solutions of two-dimensional reactive flow in rocket engine nozzles
Carlos Henrique Marchi

Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2017

View PDFchevron_right
Numerical prediction of compressible heat flow with complex wall temperature in supersonic rocket nozzles
KHALED BENSAYAH

Thermal Science, 2016

View PDFchevron_right
Compressible Flow Through a Supersonic Nozzle-A Computational Approach
Dr. Tapas Nandi

2016

View PDFchevron_right
Numerical Simulation of Reactive Flows in Overexpanded Supersonic Nozzle with Film Cooling
MohAmed SELLAM

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2015

View PDFchevron_right
Design Process and Flow Field Analysis of a Double Divergent Supersonic Nozzle: Enhancing Efficiency and Performance
Omar Abada

International Conference on Pioneer and Innovative Studies

View PDFchevron_right
Hypersonic Flow Separation in Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interactions
Awatef Hamed

1992

View PDFchevron_right
Numerical simulation of flow separation in rocket nozzle
Abdellah Hadjadj
View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

EngineeringMechanical EngineeringAerospace EngineeringFlow SeparationSupersonic flowShock WaveRocket NozzleSupersonic speed
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104