mark ritson
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
The Three Capitals of Pricing–Human, Systems and Social Capital
2002
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
In this paper we explore the possibility, heretofor unexplored in the marketing literature, that firms "invest funds" in their pricing processes. This builds on some of the recent economic work on the costs of price adjustment. To do this we undertook a two-year, cross-disciplinary, ethnographic study on the nature of investments made by senior managers to enhance the effectiveness of the pricing processes within their firms. We discovered at least three distinct types of investments that managers at these firms made to price more effectively, which we term as the three capitals of pricing -human capital, systems capital and social capital. Our evidence suggests that pricing is really about managing both prices and investments in the pricing capital used to set and adjust those prices. The existence of these three forms of pricing capital provides a new perspective on pricing strategy, suggesting that firms compete on prices simultaneously in three different ways within their organizations. First, they compete on whether to invest in pricing capital versus or other areas of capital investment, such as plant, equipment, etc. Second, they decide what form of pricing capital to invest in -human, systems or social. Third, they set and adjust prices constrained by the existing pricing capital they have in place at the time of their pricing actions. We discuss the implications of these three forms of pricing capital and these new perspectives on pricing for the marketing, economics and strategy literature.
Related papers
Pricing as a strategic capability
MIT Sloan …, 2002
For too long, most people who run companies have made a variety of unwarranted but detrimental assumptions about pricing. Changing prices, for example, has been looked upon as an easy, quick and reversible process, and new technologies have only reinforced this way ...
Pricing process as a capability: a resource-based perspective
Strategic Management Journal, 2003
Strategists following the resource-based view argue that firms can generate rents through value creation. To create value, firms develop and use resources and capabilities that other firms cannot imitate, trade for, or substitute other assets for. Even a firm that has created value, however, may not capture the potential rents associated with that value. To capture rents, a firm must set the right prices for what it sells. Most views of pricing assume that a firm can readily set appropriate prices. In contrast, we argue that pricing is a capability. To develop the ability to set the right prices, a firm must invest in resources and routines. We base our argument on a study of the pricing process of a large Midwestern manufacturing firm. We show that pricing resources, routines, and skills may help or inhibit a firm in setting the right price-and hence in appropriating value created. Our view of pricing as a capability contributes to the resourcebased view because it suggests that strategists should consider the portfolio of value creation and value appropriation capabilities a firm uses to create competitive advantage. Our view also contributes to economics because it suggests that strategic decisions about pricing capabilities have important implications for a fundamental economic action, determining prices. Managers in firms without effective pricing processes may be unable to set prices that reflect the wishes of its customers, so the customers may misuse their resources. As a result, resources may be used ineffectively. Our view of pricing as a capability therefore takes the resource-based-view straight to the heart of what is perhaps the central economic question: the best use of resources.
A resource-advantage perspective on pricing: shifting the focus from ends to means-end in pricing research?
Journal of Strategic Marketing, 2013
This paper contributes to a long-lasting debate between practitioners who argue that academia is unable to understand what pricing is all about and academics who criticize practitioner pricing approaches for lacking rigor or rationality. The paper conceptualizes a resource-advantage (R-A) perspective on pricing by drawing on the R-A theory of competition. After a review of R-A theory, the paper integrates the price discretion concept and pricing as a spanning competence by introducing a separation between resources that create and resources that extract value, thereby expanding R-A theory to pricing. The perspective aims to shed light on how the process of competition helps organizations to learn/benefit from pricing capabilities. The research shifts the focus of pricing research from an equilibrium-based static view to a dynamic, disequilibrium-provoking pricing competence. In this way, it draws attention to what is perhaps most relevant to pricing in practice: the actual means necessary to determine price.
Beyond the Cost of Price Adjustment: Investments in Pricing Capital
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
The literature on costs of price adjustment has long argued that changing prices is a complex and costly process. In fact, some authors have suggested that we should think of firms' price-setting activities as "producing" prices, similar to the way firms use production processes to produce goods and services. In this paper we explore one natural extension of this view, that besides observing costs of price adjustment, we should also expect to see firm-level investments in capital expenditures into these "pricing" production processes. We coin the term "pricing capital" for these investments, and suggest that they can improve the efficiency of the "pricing production" activities by both reducing the costs of adjusting prices, and improving the effectiveness of price adjustments in future periods. Using two types of data sources, we find compelling evidence of the existence as well as the importance of pricing capital in firms. The existence of firm-level "pricing capital" has the potential of fundamentally altering the way we think about pricing and price adjustment in many areas of economics. It suggests looking toward the "pricing capital" to decipher the likely degree and causes of price rigidity and its variation across price setters, markets, and industries. Moreover, "pricing capital" introduces a new, higher-level, pricing decision made by individual firms. Decisions to invest in pricing capital compete with traditional capital investment decisions that have long been studied in economics, such as capital investments in plant, equipment, and R&D. Furthermore, since pricing capital is a choice variable, it implies that costs of price adjustment often used in models of price rigidity are endogenous. As such, pricing capital offers new insights into the micro-foundations of the costs of price adjustment. The most provocative implication of the new theory of pricing, however, is that the allocative efficiency of the price system itself may be determined endogenously by individual price setters who choose whether and how much to invest in pricing capital.
Industrial Pricing Orientation: The Organizational Transformation to Value-Based Pricing
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
Of three main orientations to pricing in industrial markets − cost-based, competition-based and customer valuebased − most marketing and pricing scholars consider the latter superior -but few firms use it. The literature is silent about how organizational and behavioral characteristics of industrial firms may affect pricing orientation and, more specifically, value-based pricing. Semi-structured interviews with 44 managers of small to medium size U.S. industrial firms yielded insights into firm pricing orientations, processes and decision making patterns. We identified five organizational characteristics common to firms implementing value-based pricing: ability to effect deep transformational change, presence of a champion, skill in diffusing organizational capabilities, organizational confidence, and center-led pricing process specialization. Our data demonstrates that value-based pricing is not simply adopted but internalized through a long, tenuous and deep transformation process supported by an experiential and transformative learning environment.
How to Organize Pricing? Vertical Delegation and Horizontal Dispersion of Pricing Authority
Journal of Marketing, 2012
Although pricing is one of the strongest drivers of profitability, little empirical research has examined how a firm should organize pricing internally. This research draws on the information-processing view of organizational design to conceptualize a framework of how firms organize their pricing authority both within the sales function and across the sales, marketing, and finance functions. The authors find a nonlinear, inverted U-shaped relationship between the vertical delegation of pricing authority and profitability as well as a positive relationship between the horizontal dispersion of pricing authority across sales, marketing, and finance and profitability. Another key finding is a positive interaction between vertical delegation and horizontal dispersion, indicating that firms need to jointly design vertical delegation and horizontal dispersion. In addition, the results identify price-related market dynamism as a moderator of the horizontal dispersion of the pricing authorit...
The Anatomy of a Price Cut: Discovering Organizational Sources of the Costs of Price Adjustment
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
for their continuous encouragement and intellectual support on this line of research. The authors would especially like to thank Shantanu Dutta and Mark Ritson for all their efforts on this line of research. All errors are ours.
Organizational and institutional barriers to value-based pricing in industrial relationships
In their effort to differentiate themselves from cost-driven rivals, many industrial companies are beginning to serve their customers through value-based offerings. Such companies often engage actively in collaborative value creation with their customers. To capture a fair share of the value created, they need to adopt a value based pricing approach. Therefore, value-driven competition necessitates value-based pricing (VBP). The present study explores the barriers to exercising value-based pricing and suggests ways to overcome those obstacles in putting value-based pricing into action in B2B sales. The study is implemented as an exploratory multi-case study applying an abductive research methodology. Our cases show that industrial sellers try to understand and influence their customers' desired value perception, influence customer-perceived value (CPV), and improve their bargaining position as means to overcome these barriers to improved value capture. Hence, our findings deepen the current understanding of value-based pricing in industrial buyer–seller relationships. In doing so, it contributes to the literature on customer value, organizational capabilities, business models, and sales management in previously unexplored areas. Moreover, the study provides guidance to business practitioners willing to develop value-based pricing as part of their business model.
Pricing strategies and levels and their impact on corporate profitability
Revista de Administração, 2016
Pricing strategies and levels and their impact on corporate profitability Estratégias e níveis de preços e seus impactos sobre a lucratividade das empresas Estrategias y niveles de precios y su impacto en la rentabilidad de las empresas
The price of competitiveness in competitive pricing
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1997
This study examines how pricing decisions might be improved. We test the hypothesis that managers have a tendency to overcompete by comparing the performance of managers with the performance of computerized strategies in a Prisoner's Dilemma pricing experiment. We find that the subjects in our study obtain lower profits than matched computer strategies. The subjects appear to value relative performance against competitors, even when they are explicitly instructed to maximize profits and are compensated based on profits. The implication for managers is that pricing to maximize profits may require tolerating the strong performance of competitors, even to the point of accepting a lower profit than some or all the competitors. If competitiveness means an adversarial, "zero-sum game" view of one's competitors, then the price of competitiveness in competitive markets such as those in our experiment may be lower profits. Being less competitive may be more profitable.
Related papers
The conceptualization of value-based pricing in industrial firms
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2011
The current literature is largely silent on how executives interpret the concept of value-based pricing. Although only a minority of companies adopts value-based pricing approaches, little is known about antecedents of alternative pricing approaches. We suggest this may be because of the fact that few professionals possess an understanding of value-based pricing, which is both academically rigorous as well as practically relevant. Our interviews with 44 executives in 15 US industrial firms show that those practicing value-based pricing interpret customer value in ways fully consistent with the current academic literature. Those practicing cost-or competition-based pricing, however, show a poor understanding of value-based pricing, which may explain why their companies practice cost-or competition-based approaches.
Organizational design and pricing capabilities for superior firm performance
Management Decision, 2014
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to test the relationship between organizational antecedents, pricing capabilities, and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach -Quantitative survey of 748 managers from mostly large companies globally. Findings -It was found that the following five key organizational resources (the 5 Cs) -center-led price management, organizational confidence, championing behaviors, organizational change capacity, and pricing capabilities -positively influence firm performance. Furthermore, it was found that center-led price management, organizational change capacity, and championing behaviors act as important antecedents to pricing capabilities and, except for the former, to organizational confidence. The authors also examine interaction and mediation effects. Originality/value -The results thus suggest that generic organizational factors -namely center-led price management -as well as highly idiosyncratic firm, specific capabilities -namely organizational confidence, championing behaviors by top management, organizational change capacity, and pricing capabilities -are key requirements to increase firm performance via pricing.
Impact of product differentiation, marketing investments and brand equity on pricing strategies
European Journal of Marketing, 2015
Value-informed pricing in its organizational context: literature review, conceptual framework, and directions for future research
Journal of Product & Brand Management, 2007
Purpose -In the face of increased pricing pressure, managerial attention for value-informed pricing (in which a price is based on the customer's value perception) is on the rise. Although value-informed pricing in its organizational context received a great deal of attention, the body of literature is fragmented and insights are often not cumulative. It is the aim of this article to review and integrate the empirical literature on pricing practices in order to pave the road for future research. Design/methodology/approach -Empirical studies on pricing practices are collected and reviewed. Building on the resource-based view of the firm, the findings from these studies are summarized in an integrative framework that includes testable research propositions. Findings -Value-informed pricing is the result of the deployment of informational resources such as market research, relationships and internal knowledge on customers. Firms should not only develop these information sources, but also secure the process by which they are deployed. The latter is among others influenced by the competitive context and organizational information processing that may evolve into a routine. Originality/value -The article integrates the insights from a stream of research that thus far has been highly fragmented. It generates insights that may help firms to establish a value-informed pricing process and it may help to develop a more mature body of research on value-informed pricing.
Configurational theory and practices of firms employing multiple pricing policies: assessing effective and ineffective pricing recipes in multiple firm contexts
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2021
This study examines the presence and impact of complex alternative organizational configurations of pricing on firm performance. The dataset is from a survey of company owners and company CEOs, of which a subsample was used previously and analyzed with multiple regression analysis. Analyzing an enlarged dataset that includes new data using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) supports the perspective that multiple price policy paths are identifiable for indicating high performance for different firm operational contexts. By applying the perspective of complex interdependences of specific pricing activities and specific organizational configurations related to pricing, this study offers a nuanced contribution to marketing theory. To practicing managers, this study offers guidance for adopting specific configurations of pricing policies in specific contexts for achieving high firm performance as well as guidance on which configurations indicate negative firm performance outcomes.
Barriers to implementing value-based pricing in industrial markets: A micro-foundations perspective
Journal of Business Research, 2017
Value-based pricing has the potential to improve differentiation, profitability, and value creation for industrial firms and their customers. However, while most of the pricing research considers the ways organizations set or get value-based prices, only few studies consider how individual managers influence the pricing process and what prevents them from setting and getting value-based prices. This is of critical concern, since it is not just organizations, but individuals within organizations who make pricing decisions-and their decision-making is influenced by institutional pressures such as socially prescribed norms, rationalized meanings, and beliefs about profitable approaches to pricing. This study addresses this gap in the current knowledge by adopting a micro-foundations perspective to pricing, and focusing on the barriers that individual managers encounter when implementing value-based pricing. Drawing on a single case study in a global industrial firm, and from interviews with 24 managers, this study identifies 11 individually, organizationally, and externally induced barriers to value-based pricing. The study also sheds light on the potential sensegiving strategies for overcoming these barriers.
Psychological Pricing Principles for Organizations with Market Power
THE JOURNAL OF APPLIED BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2014
Variations in the pricing approaches firms employ may partially explain why observed industry prices appear inconsistent with economic theory. Some firms may use principles developed from psychology that do not fit traditional economic models to enhance their profits beyond the basic solutions from economic theory. This paper describes more than fifty of these principles, dividing them into four categories: framing, congruency, context, and signaling. By studying these principles from psychology, researchers and policy makers can better understand the prices they observe in the marketplace. By following more of these principles, firms may be able to enhance their performance.
Pricing strategies and pricing capabilities
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2011
Magnus Johansson holds a PhD from the School of Economics and Management, Lund University and has worked with strategic analysis and planning within the IT, telecom, automotive and general industry.
Intraorganizational influences on business-to-business pricing strategies: A political economy perspective
Industrial Marketing Management, 2005
ABSTRACT Historically, researchers have addressed pricing issues from many different perspectives, including the firm's business model (cost structure, experience curve), stakeholders (customers and channel partners), competition (market structure and intensity), and macroeconomic issues (interest rates, economic growth). An important dimension of organizational price setting that has been neglected is the impact that the firm's internal political system, reflected in interdepartmental coordination and rivalry, has upon price setting. A study of managers who are influential in shaping the firm's pricing strategy was conducted to identify intraorganizational issues and their relative impact on the firm's pricing strategy. The results of the study provide important implications for the development and execution of a firm's pricing strategy.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.